You do realize all the potential witnesses in the case against Trump are republicans and former Trump employees.Cool but what the judge is asking the Xiden Admin to do is show why they are using a out of district GJ
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You do realize all the potential witnesses in the case against Trump are republicans and former Trump employees.Cool but what the judge is asking the Xiden Admin to do is show why they are using a out of district GJ
Again, it really doesn't matter to you if Trump committed any of these crimes or not. In your eyes, Trump is above the Law.No the charges are very real. We are seeing a real life political prosecution in this country, much like we’ve seen in other leftist regimes, like national socialist Germany. Saddam s Iraq, castro’s cuba, statin and putin’s russia, China etc
What Trump did was no worse than what Gore did in 2000. Those college-age transgirls that make up the Dem base may not remember that, but I do.
No the charges are very real. We are seeing a real life political prosecution in this country, much like we’ve seen in other leftist regimes, like national socialist Germany. Saddam s Iraq, castro’s cuba, statin and putin’s russia, China etc
"Potential" is the right word. Another word would be "guessed," as in you guess that they might be witnesses. Let's see of they testify, and let's see what Trump's lawyers force them to admit to about what they were threatened with and what deals they cut to testify the way the prosecution wants. Then we can judge actual evidence.You do realize all the potential witnesses in the case against Trump are republicans and former Trump employees.
Ooooh. So, when a Democrat objects to the results of an election, that election was by definition stolen? But when a Republican objects to the results of an election, that is a crime?Funny, I didn't remember anyone dying because of Gore's objections to Jeb ACTUALLY stealing an election.
There was no "coup," there was only Trump giving a speech about a protest, and that protest getting out of hand. Until the FBI comes clean about how many people they had among the crowd and what their orders were, I withhold judgement on what happened.Starting a riot and launching a coup isn't a politically protected activity.
hahaha Trump didn't start a riot or launch a coup....he isn't even being alledged to have done that by the Brownshirts in the Xiden Admin.Funny, I didn't remember anyone dying because of Gore's objections to Jeb ACTUALLY stealing an election.
Starting a riot and launching a coup isn't a politically protected activity.
Ooooh. So, when a Democrat objects to the results of an election, that election was by definition stolen? But when a Republican objects to the results of an election, that is a crime?
There was no "coup," there was only Trump giving a speech about a protest, and that protest getting out of hand. Until the FBI comes clean about how many people they had among the crowd and what their orders were, I withhold judgement on what happened.
What is he being indicted for?hahaha Trump didn't start a riot or launch a coup....he isn't even being alledged to have done that by the Brownshirts in the Xiden Admin.
rewriting history, doesn't actually change the facts. It was the Dems that tried to block legally cast mail in ballots of military personal that Gore and Clinton sent overseas....it was the dems that tried to illegally count certain counties ballots in violation of the Constitutional rights of the people of FL.Well, no, you see, Jeb actually did steal the election. He purged minorities from voter rolls, he blocked recounts, etc.
And when you try to launch a coup because you didn't get the result you want, that's a crime.
Yes, loopy conspiracy theories... who you gonna believe, Trump or your lying eyes!
Maybe read the indictment…geez man, why do you comment on topics you are clueless about?What is he being indicted for?
I don't think you have read the indictment, that's is why you post bullshit trying to defend your orange master.Maybe read the indictment…geez man, why do you comment on topics you are clueless about?
I did, and that’s why I know he wasn’t indicted for any of the propaganda that was posted and why I said itI don't think you have read the indictment, that's is why you post bullshit trying to defend your orange master.
who's gonna remove her? and what is absurd about the ruling?
rewriting history, doesn't actually change the facts. It was the Dems that tried to block legally cast mail in ballots of military personal that Gore and Clinton sent overseas....it was the dems that tried to illegally count certain counties ballots in violation of the Constitutional rights of the people of FL.
Judge Aileen Cannon “Comes Out Swinging” and Delivers Blow to Jack Smith in Classified Documents Case – Liberals Scream for her Dismissal Afterwards
7 Aug 2023 ~~ By Cullen LinebargerJUST IN: Judge Aileen Cannon "Comes Out Swinging" and Delivers Blow to Jack Smith in Classified Documents Case - Liberals Scream for her Dismissal Afterwards | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger
Judge Aileen Cannon in the Southern District for Florida federal court delivered a blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump regarding the “classified documents” case.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Judge Aileen Cannon in the Southern District for Florida federal court delivered a blow to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inquisition against President Trump regarding the “classified documents” case. In their process, she also caused the liberals to go into unhinged meltdowns where they demanded her dismissal. Previous reports on her coverage can be found here and here.
As previously covered by Cristina Laila, Cannon was appointed to oversee the classified documents case to the chagrin of liberals everywhere. More examples of her coverage can be found here and here.
As Politico’s Kyle Cheney reported, Cannon struck down two of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sealed filings in her ruling today. Cheney said she came out swinging.
Judge Cannon comes out swinging at special counsel this morning, striking two of prosecutors’ sealed filings and demanding an explanation of “the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate” the docs case.
~Snip~
The Gateway Pundit’s Cristina Laila previously reported that this is not the first time Jack Smith has been smacked down by Cannon. She had previously denied motions to keep the government’s motion government’s motion to keep a list of 84 witnesses under wraps.
She also denied his request to speed up the sharing of classified documents.
Commentary:
Way to go Judge Cannon, this is a witch hunt and political interference.
The key is the DSA/Democrats want to run another `Star Chamber` operation where they can alter evidence and attest to it with no public oversight. Basic fairness allows a defendant to face his accusers and the right to impeach same witnesses.
Next thing you know, Smith will hire (never disbarred) DOJ Attorney Clinesmith to provide err "improved" evidence.
Or, Where can the DOJ find a corrupt Judge when they need one?
It only takes ONE legit judge to blow their cover.
It takes ONE legit Sherriff and District Attorney combo in the Swing States to bust up the Election Racketeering.
Note Biden won fewer districts than any president ever. He won them by incredible unfathomable margins. They knew the rules were self written in those counties and there would be no policing or conscience required.
Maoist/DSA Democrats whine when they can't get their fraudulent trials held in places like DC or NY where the judges are ideologically biased, corrupted and the Juries are biased and tainted against anyone and anything conservative.
Democrats are the criminals and traitors that Leaked Grand Jury Evidence to the Quisling Media! They also committed fraud on the Courts, used falsified evidence, and concealed evidence that would exonerate President Trump and American Citizens in prison in Washington DC for the Jan 6th setup by our treasonous government, DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, DNC, DNI, and RINO's covering up their criminal and treasonous bribery and money laundering deals with cartels, terrorists and foreign governments.
hahha nope...it was only the dems that tried to block legally cast votes...Jeb didn'tI'll admit, both parties tried to manipulate the Florida vote, but Jeb was the guy who actually did it...
None of which would be a problem if we had direct voting for the president like any other office.
A can of worms. At some point Republican voters will elect the totalitarian people you do. Trump is not a totalitarian. Many Republican voters have to walk a tightrope between your authoritarians and the authoritarians where they live.Doesn't everyone?
hahha nope...it was only the dems that tried to block legally cast votes...Jeb didn't
we have direct voting for the President, like any other election.
nope they were legally cast...Except those votes were legally cast... a lot of them were postmarked after the election.
Okay, keep telling yourself that..nope they were legally cast...