- Apr 11, 2023
- 47,404
- 22,574
- 2,488
A Dakota jury would have award EJC two or three times what she got in NY.Neat.
I believe if it was held in Rapid City, South Dakota the jury would have still found him liable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A Dakota jury would have award EJC two or three times what she got in NY.Neat.
I believe if it was held in Rapid City, South Dakota the jury would have still found him liable.
Sounds advice IMHO.
They could be in real danger if the MAGAts get ahold of their names.
![]()
Judge in Trump defamation trial advises jurors to 'never disclose that you were on this jury'
Judge Lewis Kaplan advised jurors to "never disclose" that they were on the Trump-Caroll defamation trial jury after the verdict had been read.www.businessinsider.com
Trump slandered the woman the very same day the vrrdict was announced, Anus.You mean he knows the corrupt jurors might get some shit from their fellow citizens?
Of course, the left never attacks people they do not like.
Anyone on that jury who claimed she suffered $83m in damages from a BS unprovable story is corrupt.
I should sue OP in Lakeland, Fl…how would that jury rule?
Trump will wise up when he's gang banged in Otisville by the same people he trash talks.Dem fantasy land post. Dems are going to get what they got coming to them. That's how the world works. When you are a lowlife Dem scumbag, eventually you pay the price.
What did I state that wasn't a "fact"? Was this trial not in an overwhelmingly liberal district? Was the jury pool not overwhelmingly liberal? Was the judge not a liberal? You can win cases in places like that with juries like that overseen by judges like that...but at some point justice will prevail. It's the reason we have an appeals process.No you are not. You’re whining.
Facts are facts.
So he should have shown "deference" to a left wing jury, a left wing judge and a woman who brings a law suit against him 20 years after the fact? Dream on....Did you miss the fact that Trump continually showed contempt for the jury, the court, and the plaintiff, and continued to defame her?
Juries tend not to like that.
Had he kept his mouth shut the award would probably have been 5 mil rather than 60 mil
Trump would have lost in North Dakota, Otis.What did I state that wasn't a "fact"? Was this trial not in an overwhelmingly liberal district? Was the jury pool not overwhelmingly liberal? Was the judge not a liberal? You can win cases in places like that with juries like that overseen by judges like that...but at some point justice will prevail. It's the reason we have an appeals process.
The judge is a man, Cats...unless he's decided to declare himself a woman...who knows these days!No. She is assuming their might be violence against the jurors.
She is not wrong and giving advice is not illegal.
This is just an attempt by the right to malign a judge involved in the decision to apply an 83 million dollar fine on a sexual assaulter.
That case wouldn't have gone to trial in North Dakota, John. New York's Justice System has become a joke. It's one more reason why sane people are fleeing the State!Trump would have lost in North Dakota, Otis.
Trump is the joke, as are his supporters.That case wouldn't have gone to trial in North Dakota, John. New York's Justice System has become a joke. It's one more reason why sane people are fleeing the State!
With all that you on the left have thrown at Trump, John...he's continued to increase his lead in the polls. Hmmm...wonder who the "joke" will be on come November?Trump is the joke, as are his supporters.
How do you know?What did I state that wasn't a "fact"? Was this trial not in an overwhelmingly liberal district? Was the jury pool not overwhelmingly liberal? Was the judge not a liberal? You can win cases in places like that with juries like that overseen by judges like that...but at some point justice will prevail. It's the reason we have an appeals process.
When all that is needed to point out the truth about MAGA and the MAgats is to remind them this November will be horrible your people.With all that you on the left have thrown at Trump, John...he's continued to increase his lead in the polls. Hmmm...wonder who the "joke" will be on come November?
Making America great again isn't something to be ashamed of John...a concept that you on the left don't seem to grasp. After three plus years of the most incompetent administration in history people will be ready for leaders that aren't morons. A secure border? There's nothing "horrible" about that! The only thing that would be horrible is if the country has to put up with another four years of Joe Biden getting it wrong on virtually EVERY issue!When all that is needed to point out the truth about MAGA and the MAgats is to remind them this November will be horrible your people.
My mistake. Thanks.The judge is a man, Cats...unless he's decided to declare himself a woman...who knows these days!
And yet your "woke" friends think that it does, Cats! That was sarcasm on my part...My mistake. Thanks.
Declaring themselves a woman does not make them a woman BTW.
Who are my woke friends?And yet your "woke" friends think that it does, Cats! That was sarcasm on my part...