Do you think so? It isn't possible for instance that I was saying that if the government spends X- amount of money that X-amount of money should actually be funded by taxation not by the pipedream that tax breaks for companies cause them to "trickle it down" and not simply using it as extra profit, resulting in economic growth, and causing it to magically fund itself?Waaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more stupid. Your position actually implies that.
It isnt a strawman. You said people keeping more of THEIR OWN MONEY is the govt giving them money. Obviously, that is completely illogical.
I know it's a radical thought but think it through.
Last edited: