If so, you must know the reason why the scientific community is split about
the effectiveness of Ivermectin.
The following assessment is written by pro-vax researchers, thus the initial statement about the vaccines “providing protection”
is only true because the likelihood of severity is reduced, not the risk of contracting the virus.
The only thing these current vaccines do is to reduce the odds of serious outcome.
More and more people will come to learn that obesity and diabetes account for at least 40% of all COVID-19 hospitalizations and other comorbitities are the primary factors that lead to most hospitalization for COVID-19.
“Although vaccines provide protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there remains a need for antivirals to treat COVID-19. Nucleotide analog drugs such as remdesivir, which target the viral RNA polymerase, have potential but are compromised by exoribonuclease (ExoN) activity that removes incorrect nucleotides from newly synthesized RNA.”
So from my understanding, the med is still effective, but doing more than what’s required which needs further evaluation. IOW, it is not an accurate statement to say that it does not work.
www.science.org
In order to survive and propagate, RNA viruses must achieve a balance between the capacity for adaptation to new environmental conditions or host cells with the need to maintain an intact and replication competent genome. Several virus families in the order Nidovirales, such as the coronaviruses...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
politicalhaven.forumotion.com
