Joe Biden Just Got Some Very Bad News

[surada]

Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.

maybe we need to send them another $150,000,000,000 in cash?

You mean let them have access to their own money? Because that is all that actually happened.

So whenever the government seizes assets from terrorists sponsors it MUST give it back?

Really?

The froze Iranian bank accouts all over the world.. The money didn't belong to the Ayatollah.

 

[Likkmee]

Biden is doing a great job repairing the damage done by his predecessor.

What? In bending over and doing the ChiComm's bidding?

You’re absolutely bat shit crazy about this Chinese communist crap. Biden isn’t doing anything for the Chinese and neither is anyone else in the US.

This is just more Rabid right wing propaganda bullshit and lies. Cut it out asshole. You have zero credibility now and you’re pretty soon going to be the first poster I put on my ignored list.

Every time you post this Chinese bullshit you look more and more like a complete idiot. Sometimes you can judge a book by its cover. Yours is blank.

I make no bones about who the real enemy of America is. And it isn't Trump nor Conservatives. it's the Communist Left and the sooner Bi-Dumb is gone, the better.

Enemies ? Americans. The assholes that put all these scumbags in power(both sides).

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.

As if they were ever abiding by anything other than what they 100% wished to do. You illustrate your naivetey.

EARTH TO ALL LIBERALS: Here is the good advice from an Israeli senator > "You don't negotiate with terrorists. You fight terrorists, and you defeat them."

Your blob signed an agreement with the Taliban.

Please criticize your blob.

Bet you can't

That was decades ago

The Taliban didn't exist in 1985.

Yes they did. The Taliban were fighting the Russians. Reagan was their friend

Hey shit for brains! That was a group called the Northern Alliance and they now make up the current Afghan government.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

and they have started producing uranium metal, which has absolutely no civilian use.

Actually, we use depleted uranium in order to make a special amour plating for our military.

Armour is a meat company. Armor is what you meant.

Depleted uranium is a byproduct of processing uranium for nuclear fuel.

 

[Concerned American]

What agreement? Who signed it? How many votes did it get in the Senate?

Are they ever going to stop talking about agreements. Again: with Iran, THERE ARE NO AGREEMENTS. What there might be, is nuclear bombs entering your ports, and I mean SOON.

and they have started producing uranium metal, which has absolutely no civilian use.

Actually, we use depleted uranium in order to make a special amour plating for our military.

Armour is a meat company. Armor is what you meant.

Depleted uranium is a byproduct of processing uranium for nuclear fuel.

Armour meat company is also owned by Smithfield Farms--the largest pork producer in the US and it is owned by the Chinese.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Since Joe Biden was inaugurated, the Iranians have been levying demands against the United States, and Joe Biden has been eager to appease. Negotiations for the re-entry of the United States and Iran into the nuclear deal are ongoing in Vienna.

Now a memo from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is throwing a wrench in Biden’s plans. The IAEA says that they have not had access to data or measuring devices used to monitor Iranian nuclear material and equipment since February 23 of this year.

Since they don’t have exact numbers, the IAEA estimates the Iranian nuclear stockpile has increased to 7,145 pounds of enriched uranium – far more than the 447 pound limit from the 2015 nuclear deal. If that wasn’t bad enough, inspectors earlier this year found uranium particles at two Iranian sites previously undisclosed by Iran, and they have started producing uranium metal, which has absolutely no civilian use.

The silence from the Biden administration is deafening.

The 2015 deal that Trump dumped?

Because the Iranians were violating it? The deal the Oreo passed? Iran was giving the Oreo the middle finger the entire time.

UN agency says Iran is violating all restrictions of nuclear deal

Meanwhile, Russia is defending Iran’s right to launch a satellite, dismissing U.S. claims that Tehran was defying the U.N. resolution endorsing the 2015 nuclear deal by sending it into space.

www.defensenews.com

 

[toobfreak]

and they have started producing uranium metal, which has absolutely no civilian use.

Actually, we use depleted uranium in order to make a special amour plating for our military.

Armour is a meat company. Armor is what you meant.

Yeah, thanks, I knew it didn't look right at the time but didn't have the desire or time while posting to spell check it. I actually originally thought maybe I had said the french word for love. I figured folks would know what it meant.

Depleted uranium is a byproduct of processing uranium for nuclear fuel.

That's right. That is how it gets depleted.

 

[surada]

Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.

As if they were ever abiding by anything other than what they 100% wished to do. You illustrate your naivetey.

EARTH TO ALL LIBERALS: Here is the good advice from an Israeli senator > "You don't negotiate with terrorists. You fight terrorists, and you defeat them."

Israelis failed to arrest the men who attacked the AlAqsa mosque. The Israelis are terrorists.

 

[toobfreak]

Armour meat company is also owned by Smithfield Farms--the largest pork producer in the US and it is owned by the Chinese.

I wonder if that is where ex-Chinese scientists at the Wuhan Lab turn up who disappear after going public about the lab developing Covid-19?

My last pork sausage had a lot of gristle in it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They wanted to expand their electrical grid to become a fully industrialized nation.

They can't expand their electrical grid with natural gas plants?

 

[surada]

They wanted to expand their electrical grid to become a fully industrialized nation.

They can't expand their electrical grid with natural gas plants?

Sixty Years of “Atoms for Peace” and Iran’s Nuclear Program | Brookings

Ariana Rowberry argues that, though the U.S. program "Atoms for Peace", started by President Eisenhower, provided Iran with a 5 megawatt test reactor in 1967, it is not at fault for Iran's civil or military nuclear aspirations. Tehran also received help from Pakistan, China and Russia, including...

www.brookings.edu

Hopeful that the peaceful atom could prevail, Eisenhower proposed that “governments principally involved, to the extent permitted by elementary prudence, should begin now and continue to make joint contributions from their stockpiles of normal uranium and fissionable material to an international atomic energy agency.” Eisenhower’s speech set into motion the creation of the Atoms for Peace program. This visionary program was based on a bargain between the United States and developing states. The United States provided research reactors, fuel and scientific training to developing countries wanting civilian nuclear programs. In exchange, recipient states committed to only use the technology and education for peaceful, civilian purposes.

Today, the implementation of Eisenhower’s vision is still contested. While well intentioned, the Atoms for Peace program has been criticized for facilitating nuclear proliferation by spreading dual use nuclear technology, i.e., technologies and materials, such as highly enriched uranium, used in early civilian nuclear programs that can also be used for the production of nuclear weapons. Some believe that Atoms for Peace set nuclear aspirants, like Iran, on the path to acquiring necessary technologies and materials for the development of a nuclear weapons program.

The Atoms for Peace program provided the foundations for Iran’s nuclear program by providing key nuclear technology and education. Iran’s nuclear program began under Mohamed Reza Shah’s rule in 1957, after the United States and Iran agreed to a civilian nuclear cooperation arrangement, known as the Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Atoms, through the Atoms for Peace program. Two years later, the Shah established the Tehran Nuclear Research Center (TNRC), located at the University of Tehran, and began to negotiate with the United States to provide Iran with nuclear technology and materials.

In 1967, the United States supplied Iran with a 5 megawatt nuclear research reactor along with highly enriched uranium to fuel the reactor, housed at the TRNC. The reactor, under safeguards, had the capability to produce up to 600 grams of plutonium per year in spent fuel. Akbar Etemad, deemed the father of Iran’s nuclear program, later revealed that the TNRC was the site of experiments with chemically extracting plutonium. Iran also admitted to using the reactor in the early 1990s for the production of small amounts of Polonium-210, a radioactive substance that can be used to start a chain reaction inside a nuclear weapon.

However, Iran states the production of Polonium-210 was used for research on production of neutron sources to be used in radio isotopic thermoelectric generators, not nuclear weapons. Moreover, the TRNC is thought to be the location of earlier Iranian experiments on enriching uranium through laser isotope separation, a method that Iran appears to have been researching since the mid-1970s. Whatever Iran’s true intentions with the TRNC, it seems clear that the technology provided by the United States allowed Iran to further its nuclear program in ways that went beyond what was originally intended.

In addition to providing technology, the Atoms for Peace program provided the opportunity for Iranians to receive scientific and technological education in the United States.

This educational training was crucial to the development of Iran’s nuclear energy program. For example, because Iran lacked large numbers of individuals trained in nuclear engineering and physics, the Tehran research reactor sat idle for nearly a decade, as it did not have adequate manpower to run. The Shah also needed manpower to meet his lofty ambition of rapidly expanding nuclear energy. In 1974, he announced his desire to construct 20 nuclear power reactors in the following 20 years. Subsequently, he called for the establishment of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) to control and monitor nuclear energy.

To meet these rising demands, the AEOI concluded an agreement with MIT in 1975 to provide a specialized master’s program to provide Iranians with scientific and technological training on nuclear energy. This program provided Iran with its first set of professional nuclear engineers. In 1976, the Shah raised the budget of the AEOI from $31 million to $1 billion, in part because the he recognized the significance of the training provided to Iranians.

Following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the United States abruptly ended its civilian nuclear cooperation agreement with Iran and ended its supply of highly enriched uranium. Despite the termination of Atoms for Peace assistance to Iran, Iran still received support from different sources. While the United States exerted its influence to limit Iran’s collaboration with other states, Iran was still able to find partners to expand its nuclear program, including in areas applicable to the military use of nuclear energy. Particularly influential for the development of Iran’s nuclear program in those areas were Pakistan’s AQ Khan, China and Russia.

continued

 

[Crepitus]

There was no deal Chang.

Iran was bound to nothing - they never signed any agreement.

But they did verbally tell the IAEA and the world that they would not exceed 447 pounds of red (enriched) uranium of the 235 isotope. They also said what they had showed the IAEA was the only enriched uranium they had.

Cat is out of bag on both if these.

One of these days Israel is going to bomb the crap out of these goons like they did to Iraq, with a fleet of F-16s in 1985.

dOnald tRump broke the deal. after that they were no longer obligated.

 

[Crepitus]

There was a deal, you kids spent hours telling us how terrible it was, and more hours stroking yourselves to tRump blowing it up.

DERP

Dumbass lying ****.

{

The Iran deal was no sacred American commitment. This was the action of one administration, working with allies and other nations who were fully aware of American domestic skepticism and fully aware of the nature of the “political commitment” they were making.}

A Trip Down Memory Lane: In 2015 the Obama Administration Said the Iran Deal Wasn’t Even a ‘Signed Document’ | National Review

The Iran deal wasn’t binding then, and it’s not binding now.

www.nationalreview.com

I ran abided by the deal until dOnald tRump broke it.

 

[Crepitus]

There was a deal, you kids spent hours telling us how terrible it was, and more hours stroking yourselves to tRump blowing it up.

Get back on topic to June 2021.

This is the topic.

Deal with it, Snowflake.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They wanted to expand their electrical grid to become a fully industrialized nation.

They can't expand their electrical grid with natural gas plants?

Sixty Years of “Atoms for Peace” and Iran’s Nuclear Program | Brookings

Ariana Rowberry argues that, though the U.S. program "Atoms for Peace", started by President Eisenhower, provided Iran with a 5 megawatt test reactor in 1967, it is not at fault for Iran's civil or military nuclear aspirations. Tehran also received help from Pakistan, China and Russia, including...

www.brookings.edu

Hopeful that the peaceful atom could prevail, Eisenhower proposed that “governments principally involved, to the extent permitted by elementary prudence, should begin now and continue to make joint contributions from their stockpiles of normal uranium and fissionable material to an international atomic energy agency.” Eisenhower’s speech set into motion the creation of the Atoms for Peace program. This visionary program was based on a bargain between the United States and developing states. The United States provided research reactors, fuel and scientific training to developing countries wanting civilian nuclear programs. In exchange, recipient states committed to only use the technology and education for peaceful, civilian purposes.

Today, the implementation of Eisenhower’s vision is still contested. While well intentioned, the Atoms for Peace program has been criticized for facilitating nuclear proliferation by spreading dual use nuclear technology, i.e., technologies and materials, such as highly enriched uranium, used in early civilian nuclear programs that can also be used for the production of nuclear weapons. Some believe that Atoms for Peace set nuclear aspirants, like Iran, on the path to acquiring necessary technologies and materials for the development of a nuclear weapons program.

The Atoms for Peace program provided the foundations for Iran’s nuclear program by providing key nuclear technology and education. Iran’s nuclear program began under Mohamed Reza Shah’s rule in 1957, after the United States and Iran agreed to a civilian nuclear cooperation arrangement, known as the Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Atoms, through the Atoms for Peace program. Two years later, the Shah established the Tehran Nuclear Research Center (TNRC), located at the University of Tehran, and began to negotiate with the United States to provide Iran with nuclear technology and materials.

In 1967, the United States supplied Iran with a 5 megawatt nuclear research reactor along with highly enriched uranium to fuel the reactor, housed at the TRNC. The reactor, under safeguards, had the capability to produce up to 600 grams of plutonium per year in spent fuel. Akbar Etemad, deemed the father of Iran’s nuclear program, later revealed that the TNRC was the site of experiments with chemically extracting plutonium. Iran also admitted to using the reactor in the early 1990s for the production of small amounts of Polonium-210, a radioactive substance that can be used to start a chain reaction inside a nuclear weapon.

However, Iran states the production of Polonium-210 was used for research on production of neutron sources to be used in radio isotopic thermoelectric generators, not nuclear weapons. Moreover, the TRNC is thought to be the location of earlier Iranian experiments on enriching uranium through laser isotope separation, a method that Iran appears to have been researching since the mid-1970s. Whatever Iran’s true intentions with the TRNC, it seems clear that the technology provided by the United States allowed Iran to further its nuclear program in ways that went beyond what was originally intended.

In addition to providing technology, the Atoms for Peace program provided the opportunity for Iranians to receive scientific and technological education in the United States.

This educational training was crucial to the development of Iran’s nuclear energy program. For example, because Iran lacked large numbers of individuals trained in nuclear engineering and physics, the Tehran research reactor sat idle for nearly a decade, as it did not have adequate manpower to run. The Shah also needed manpower to meet his lofty ambition of rapidly expanding nuclear energy. In 1974, he announced his desire to construct 20 nuclear power reactors in the following 20 years. Subsequently, he called for the establishment of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) to control and monitor nuclear energy.

To meet these rising demands, the AEOI concluded an agreement with MIT in 1975 to provide a specialized master’s program to provide Iranians with scientific and technological training on nuclear energy. This program provided Iran with its first set of professional nuclear engineers. In 1976, the Shah raised the budget of the AEOI from $31 million to $1 billion, in part because the he recognized the significance of the training provided to Iranians.

Following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the United States abruptly ended its civilian nuclear cooperation agreement with Iran and ended its supply of highly enriched uranium. Despite the termination of Atoms for Peace assistance to Iran, Iran still received support from different sources. While the United States exerted its influence to limit Iran’s collaboration with other states, Iran was still able to find partners to expand its nuclear program, including in areas applicable to the military use of nuclear energy. Particularly influential for the development of Iran’s nuclear program in those areas were Pakistan’s AQ Khan, China and Russia.

continued

Thanks for the link.
You didn't answer my question.

They can't expand their electrical grid with natural gas plants?

 

[Concerned American]

Armour meat company is also owned by Smithfield Farms--the largest pork producer in the US and it is owned by the Chinese.

I wonder if that is where ex-Chinese scientists at the Wuhan Lab turn up who disappear after going public about the lab developing Covid-19?

My last pork sausage had a lot of gristle in it.

It is amazing how many companies that Smithfield owns. Nathan's, Hormel, Nalley, John Morrell, Bar S, Jimmy Dean, and a bunch more. I boycott as many as I can, but I can't keep track of them all.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There was a deal, you kids spent hours telling us how terrible it was, and more hours stroking yourselves to tRump blowing it up.

DERP

Dumbass lying ****.

{

The Iran deal was no sacred American commitment. This was the action of one administration, working with allies and other nations who were fully aware of American domestic skepticism and fully aware of the nature of the “political commitment” they were making.}

A Trip Down Memory Lane: In 2015 the Obama Administration Said the Iran Deal Wasn’t Even a ‘Signed Document’ | National Review

The Iran deal wasn’t binding then, and it’s not binding now.

www.nationalreview.com

I ran abided by the deal until dOnald tRump broke it.

How do you know they abided?

 

[Uncensored2008]

What money we kept when they took our hostages?

Here's the deal, you of the radical left like to say traitor Obama was giving Iran back their own money. Of course that is nowhere near true.

Iranian frozen assets - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In fact, when the assets were frozen they belonged to free Iran, not to the Mullahs. Traitor **** Obama took money from a different government and gave it to his terrorist pals to fund their attacks on Israel and help them build nuclear weapons.

Now Obama DID get a spectacular mansion in Martha's Vineyard from the deal, still that was never money that belonged to the terrorist regime. Obama's treason has no justification.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Since Joe Biden was inaugurated, the Iranians have been levying demands against the United States, and Joe Biden has been eager to appease. Negotiations for the re-entry of the United States and Iran into the nuclear deal are ongoing in Vienna.

Now a memo from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is throwing a wrench in Biden’s plans. The IAEA says that they have not had access to data or measuring devices used to monitor Iranian nuclear material and equipment since February 23 of this year.

Since they don’t have exact numbers, the IAEA estimates the Iranian nuclear stockpile has increased to 7,145 pounds of enriched uranium – far more than the 447 pound limit from the 2015 nuclear deal. If that wasn’t bad enough, inspectors earlier this year found uranium particles at two Iranian sites previously undisclosed by Iran, and they have started producing uranium metal, which has absolutely no civilian use.

The silence from the Biden administration is deafening.

Xi's man doesn't care. He and Barry sent pallets of American cash to Iran. Iran put envelopes of some of that cash into Quid Pro's coat pocket. They bought a service from the old crook, he is delivering. Resident Biadegn has spent his entire career fostering bribes, he plays the game, Iran paid him - he will deliver no matter what.

Obama, and the heads of other nations, agreed to return funds that were seized or frozen because of violations. Those violations had been remedied. Keeping the money would have been theft.

Yeah, keeping the money would have been awful.
Can't keep the money of terrorists. How will they commit acts of terror if you do that?

We ("we being the US, Germany, UK, France and even China) seized the money and froze the assets of a sovereign nation because of violations in a nuclear agreement. When Iran remedied the violations, all of the nations involved lifted the sanctions which freed the money that was frozen. The money was mostly held in foreign banks and was never the property of the US.

We ("we being the US, Germany, UK, France and even China) seized the money and froze the assets of a sovereign nation because of violations in a nuclear agreement.

What about the money we kept when they took our hostages?

The money was mostly held in foreign banks and was never the property of the US.

Handing money to a terrorist regime is never a good idea, no matter where it was held.

What money we kept when they took our hostages?

The Iranians had billions in US banks when the Ayatollah and his gang took over and held the US Embassy staff as hostages. An embargo was placed on the funds and they were not allowed to move them out of the US.

A US court said that the money could be used to compensate victims of the 9/11 attacks, but I’m not aware of any claims that succeeded.

The money was always the property of the Iranians and the courts would always have ordered it returned to its rightful owner with interest. And that’s what Obama did after the nuclear accord was signed.

I would also stress the Iran was in full compliance with the Accord when Trump just tore it up. The Iranians are under no obligation to be in compliance with anything since the US never signed it and Trump tore it up. It was not the Iranians who broke the deal it was Donald Trump.

False.

The money never belonged to the terrorist regime. When the democratic republic of Iran is restored, the money belonged to them. Obama committed treason (repeatedly) - funding the terrorist nuclear program is just one example.

 

[WinterBorn]

Since Joe Biden was inaugurated, the Iranians have been levying demands against the United States, and Joe Biden has been eager to appease. Negotiations for the re-entry of the United States and Iran into the nuclear deal are ongoing in Vienna.

Now a memo from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is throwing a wrench in Biden’s plans. The IAEA says that they have not had access to data or measuring devices used to monitor Iranian nuclear material and equipment since February 23 of this year.

Since they don’t have exact numbers, the IAEA estimates the Iranian nuclear stockpile has increased to 7,145 pounds of enriched uranium – far more than the 447 pound limit from the 2015 nuclear deal. If that wasn’t bad enough, inspectors earlier this year found uranium particles at two Iranian sites previously undisclosed by Iran, and they have started producing uranium metal, which has absolutely no civilian use.

The silence from the Biden administration is deafening.

Xi's man doesn't care. He and Barry sent pallets of American cash to Iran. Iran put envelopes of some of that cash into Quid Pro's coat pocket. They bought a service from the old crook, he is delivering. Resident Biadegn has spent his entire career fostering bribes, he plays the game, Iran paid him - he will deliver no matter what.

Obama, and the heads of other nations, agreed to return funds that were seized or frozen because of violations. Those violations had been remedied. Keeping the money would have been theft.

Yeah, keeping the money would have been awful.
Can't keep the money of terrorists. How will they commit acts of terror if you do that?

We ("we being the US, Germany, UK, France and even China) seized the money and froze the assets of a sovereign nation because of violations in a nuclear agreement. When Iran remedied the violations, all of the nations involved lifted the sanctions which freed the money that was frozen. The money was mostly held in foreign banks and was never the property of the US.

We ("we being the US, Germany, UK, France and even China) seized the money and froze the assets of a sovereign nation because of violations in a nuclear agreement.

What about the money we kept when they took our hostages?

The money was mostly held in foreign banks and was never the property of the US.

Handing money to a terrorist regime is never a good idea, no matter where it was held.

What money we kept when they took our hostages?

The Iranians had billions in US banks when the Ayatollah and his gang took over and held the US Embassy staff as hostages. An embargo was placed on the funds and they were not allowed to move them out of the US.

A US court said that the money could be used to compensate victims of the 9/11 attacks, but I’m not aware of any claims that succeeded.

The money was always the property of the Iranians and the courts would always have ordered it returned to its rightful owner with interest. And that’s what Obama did after the nuclear accord was signed.

I would also stress the Iran was in full compliance with the Accord when Trump just tore it up. The Iranians are under no obligation to be in compliance with anything since the US never signed it and Trump tore it up. It was not the Iranians who broke the deal it was Donald Trump.

False.

The money never belonged to the terrorist regime. When the democratic republic of Iran is restored, the money belonged to them. Obama committed treason (repeatedly) - funding the terrorist nuclear program is just one example.

When was there a democratic republic of Iran? Prior to 1953?