Joe Biden Does CNN Town Hall. Surprise!!! Not Asked About Serious Rape Allegation

WelfareQueen

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2013
15,779
12,854
2,415
Uranus


Nitwit Joe Biden said during the Kavanaugh witch hunt that all women who make a rape or sexual assault allegation must be believed. Well, there is a highly credible rape allegation against Joe so I guess by his definition he is a rapist.

Interestingly, CNN just had a town hall with Retard Joe and didn't ask him a thing about it. Go figure, right?


I would encourage to read the linked story. Fascinating.
 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.
 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.


Huffington Post, National Review and a few other main stream media have covered it, but most have not as you said. CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, NY Times and many others are completely ignoring it.

Joe now has 8 accussers. Here is a link to the Huffington Post story. You can decide if the claim is credible or not.


 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.
So the Supreme Court justices that were accused, their accusers were credible, even when people that were supposed to be eye witnesses said it never happened. But because it is Biden it probably is not simply because it only leaves Bernie.
That's a real endorsement
 
How many major fuckups did Plugs have? The over/under was 2400 and I had the over for $200. Did the pedo/rapist make me some money?
 
No, just shut up for once.

How many major fuckups did Plugs have? The over/under was 2400 and I had the over for $200. Did the pedo/rapist make me some money?


Hey Joe just sniffed some hair and pressed and a woman against a wall and had a "penetrating" conversation. What's the big deal?


f48f6e16ad94c28924097796538f7f3a84ad7727.jpeg
 


Nitwit Joe Biden said during the Kavanaugh witch hunt that all women who make a rape or sexual assault allegation must be believed. Well, there is a highly credible rape allegation against Joe so I guess by his definition he is a rapist.

Interestingly, CNN just had a town hall with Retard Joe and didn't ask him a thing about it. Go figure, right?


I would encourage to read the linked story. Fascinating.

It should be no surprise. He'll ostensibly be running against an incumbent rapist, porn actress poker and celebrated celebrity pussy grabber. Isn't it time we get beyond pretending this type of behavior is taboo? It's not, it's like corruption and lying.

My corrupt lying rapist is less evil than your corrupt lying rapist. There's your election.
 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.


Huffington Post, National Review and a few other main stream media have covered it, but most have not as you said. CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, NY Times and many othersBare completely ignoring it.

Joe now has 8 accussers. Here is a link to the Huffington Post story. You can decide if the claim is credible or not.


I've already read it, and several others. They are all just copying from each other. Actually, Heavy is the only one that has dug a little deeper, but it has nothing to do with the allegations. Joe's other accusers did not accuse him of THAT, though. I had a stepfather who was all "hand-y" when he'd been drinking; a woman can tell when it's innocent friendliness and when it's subtle advances. I am not saying Tara Reade is lying. As always, there were no witnesses. But I'd like to hear from the politicians she says she contacted, and I'd like to hear directly from the organization that turned her down. I'd like to hear from some of the people she worked for as a Senate aide. She worked for several and left over an "argument" with coworkers. What was that about? I understand people not wanting to be involved in a media circus like the Kavanaugh mess, but this needs to be cleared up, if possible.

Or, once again, we may be knowingly voting for a pig. Like Clinton, like Trump. Does it affect their political wherewithal? No. Maybe we need to stop focusing on their all too human lives behind the curtain and accept that they're no better than we are. If Biden did what Reade said, it was reprehensible. His campaign says he didn't and they asked the media to vet this woman's claims. But so far, silence.
 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.


Huffington Post, National Review and a few other main stream media have covered it, but most have not as you said. CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, NY Times and many othersBare completely ignoring it.

Joe now has 8 accussers. Here is a link to the Huffington Post story. You can decide if the claim is credible or not.


I've already read it, and several others. They are all just copying from each other. Actually, Heavy is the only one that has dug a little deeper, but it has nothing to do with the allegations. Joe's other accusers did not accuse him of THAT, though. I had a stepfather who was all "hand-y" when he'd been drinking; a woman can tell when it's innocent friendliness and when it's subtle advances. I am not saying Tara Reade is lying. As always, there were no witnesses. But I'd like to hear from the politicians she says she contacted, and I'd like to hear directly from the organization that turned her down. I'd like to hear from some of the people she worked for as a Senate aide. She worked for several and left over an "argument" with coworkers. What was that about? I understand people not wanting to be involved in a media circus like the Kavanaugh mess, but this needs to be cleared up, if possible.

Or, once again, we may be knowingly voting for a pig. Like Clinton, like Trump. Does it affect their political wherewithal? No. Maybe we need to stop focusing on their all too human lives behind the curtain and accept that they're no better than we are. If Biden did what Reade said, it was reprehensible. His campaign says he didn't and they asked the media to vet this woman's claims. But so far, silence.


I agree with your comments but would add one thing. The Biden campaign asking the media "to vet" this woman's claims are a joke. The media is utterly corrupt and obviously plays by two sets of rules. Republicans and conservatives and rapists who are automatically guilty (Kavanaugh, Trump) but if they are Democrats the women are liars or ignored.

Biden's accuser has been completely ignored by the main stream media and will continue to be ignored. If she is telling the truth it is almost as if she is being assaulted again. It is shameful how the media is treating this story.

As for Trump, he is a womanizer and a pig in my opinion. But I do not believe he has ever engaged in non-consensual sex.

Biden has engaged in public non-consensual active with many women that is creepy and perverse. The hair sniffing, the grabbing, the kissing. The women have not consented to his advances and it's gross. Would he engage in private non-consensual sexual activity? It certainly seems plausible to me. At the least the various women's claims against Biden should be rigorously publicly vetted by the main stream media. But we both know they will not.
 
The only bigger fuckup than Quid Pro Joe in that so-called Townhall, was Anderson Cooper.
What a mealy-mouthed homo he turned out to be!
 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.


Huffington Post, National Review and a few other main stream media have covered it, but most have not as you said. CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, NY Times and many othersBare completely ignoring it.

Joe now has 8 accussers. Here is a link to the Huffington Post story. You can decide if the claim is credible or not.


I've already read it, and several others. They are all just copying from each other. Actually, Heavy is the only one that has dug a little deeper, but it has nothing to do with the allegations. Joe's other accusers did not accuse him of THAT, though. I had a stepfather who was all "hand-y" when he'd been drinking; a woman can tell when it's innocent friendliness and when it's subtle advances. I am not saying Tara Reade is lying. As always, there were no witnesses. But I'd like to hear from the politicians she says she contacted, and I'd like to hear directly from the organization that turned her down. I'd like to hear from some of the people she worked for as a Senate aide. She worked for several and left over an "argument" with coworkers. What was that about? I understand people not wanting to be involved in a media circus like the Kavanaugh mess, but this needs to be cleared up, if possible.

Or, once again, we may be knowingly voting for a pig. Like Clinton, like Trump. Does it affect their political wherewithal? No. Maybe we need to stop focusing on their all too human lives behind the curtain and accept that they're no better than we are. If Biden did what Reade said, it was reprehensible. His campaign says he didn't and they asked the media to vet this woman's claims. But so far, silence.


I agree with your comments but would add one thing. The Biden campaign asking the media "to vet" this woman's claims are a joke. The media is utterly corrupt and obviously plays by two sets of rules. Republicans and conservatives and rapists who are automatically guilty (Kavanaugh, Trump) but if they are Democrats the women are liars or ignored.

Biden's accuser has been completely ignored by the main stream media and will continue to be ignored. If she is telling the truth it is almost as if she is being assaulted again. It is shameful how the media is treating this story.

As for Trump, he is a womanizer and a pig in my opinion. But I do not believe he has ever engaged in non-consensual sex.

Biden has engaged in public non-consensual active with many women that is creepy and perverse. The hair sniffing, the grabbing, the kissing. The women have not consented to his advances and it's gross. Would he engage in private non-consensual sexual activity? It certainly seems plausible to me. At the least the various women's claims against Biden should be rigorously publicly vetted by the main stream media. But we both know they will not.
I agree with you that these claims need to be looked into. The Democratic politicians' offices Reade contacted blew her off, too. I'm not convinced that the MSM is keeping still because he's a Democrat, though.
 
All of those questions at a Town Hall are known beforehand and the candidate gets to turn down the ones they don't want to answer.

I wish he would, though. It doesn't surprise me that CNN didn't ask him, but earlier today when I checked, none of the majors had picked it up, and I am wondering if it is because they looked into her story and didn't find it credible. Or maybe they are all praying that this doesn't tank Joe's candidacy. It leaves no one but Bernie to take up the flag, and that would be a disaster.


Huffington Post, National Review and a few other main stream media have covered it, but most have not as you said. CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, NY Times and many othersBare completely ignoring it.

Joe now has 8 accussers. Here is a link to the Huffington Post story. You can decide if the claim is credible or not.


I've already read it, and several others. They are all just copying from each other. Actually, Heavy is the only one that has dug a little deeper, but it has nothing to do with the allegations. Joe's other accusers did not accuse him of THAT, though. I had a stepfather who was all "hand-y" when he'd been drinking; a woman can tell when it's innocent friendliness and when it's subtle advances. I am not saying Tara Reade is lying. As always, there were no witnesses. But I'd like to hear from the politicians she says she contacted, and I'd like to hear directly from the organization that turned her down. I'd like to hear from some of the people she worked for as a Senate aide. She worked for several and left over an "argument" with coworkers. What was that about? I understand people not wanting to be involved in a media circus like the Kavanaugh mess, but this needs to be cleared up, if possible.

Or, once again, we may be knowingly voting for a pig. Like Clinton, like Trump. Does it affect their political wherewithal? No. Maybe we need to stop focusing on their all too human lives behind the curtain and accept that they're no better than we are. If Biden did what Reade said, it was reprehensible. His campaign says he didn't and they asked the media to vet this woman's claims. But so far, silence.


I agree with your comments but would add one thing. The Biden campaign asking the media "to vet" this woman's claims are a joke. The media is utterly corrupt and obviously plays by two sets of rules. Republicans and conservatives and rapists who are automatically guilty (Kavanaugh, Trump) but if they are Democrats the women are liars or ignored.

Biden's accuser has been completely ignored by the main stream media and will continue to be ignored. If she is telling the truth it is almost as if she is being assaulted again. It is shameful how the media is treating this story.

As for Trump, he is a womanizer and a pig in my opinion. But I do not believe he has ever engaged in non-consensual sex.

Biden has engaged in public non-consensual active with many women that is creepy and perverse. The hair sniffing, the grabbing, the kissing. The women have not consented to his advances and it's gross. Would he engage in private non-consensual sexual activity? It certainly seems plausible to me. At the least the various women's claims against Biden should be rigorously publicly vetted by the main stream media. But we both know they will not.
Like this
 

Forum List

Back
Top