One particular inconvenient fact about the Hunter Biden laptop

Show us what they were “selling”. Use your evidence. Make the case.
You're the one who claims their business was legitimate. You tell us whet they were selling. The evidence shows they were selling Biden's pull, moron.

One again, you weasel out of telling us what this "legitimate business" was selling. You're only convincing people that he's a criminal.
 
You're the one who claims their business was legitimate. You tell us whet they were selling. The evidence shows they were selling Biden's pull, moron.

One again, you weasel out of telling us what this "legitimate business" was selling. You're only convincing people that he's a criminal.
Selling Biden’s “pull”. Nowhere does it show they received any “pull”. Archer testified that they were selling “the brand”.

Nothing actually was sold but the illusion of access
 
Selling Biden’s “pull”. Nowhere does it show they received any “pull”. Archer testified that they were selling “the brand”.

Nothing actually was sold but the illusion of access
Good luck with that
 
Selling Biden’s “pull”. Nowhere does it show they received any “pull”. Archer testified that they were selling “the brand”.

Nothing actually was sold but the illusion of access
Did you imagine Joe and Hunter were going to announce what they are selling? How much of a dumbfuck are you?
 
That statement presents facts not in evidence.

once again: It also means that facts discovered by the grand jury, constitute evidence. So there is ample evidence of Trumps guilt, as presented to a court of law, and included in the indictment.
A Grand Jury is not a court of law, Frack. It's a one sided presentation by the Prosecution at which the defense isn't allowed to question what's being shown to the Grand Jury.
 
You're the one who claims their business was legitimate. You tell us whet they were selling. The evidence shows they were selling Biden's pull, moron.

One again, you weasel out of telling us what this "legitimate business" was selling. You're only convincing people that he's a criminal.
No. The default is legitimate.
You’re claiming otherwise.
Stop being a bitch and show your evidence or STFU. :rolleyes:
 
There is no Durham "anything" at all.
Only one indictment for Clinesmith for falsifying evidence, just shows that the deep state has too much power. Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, and several other FBI agents should have all been indicted for abuse of power.
 
Only one indictment for Clinesmith for falsifying evidence, just shows that the deep state has too much power. Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, and several other FBI agents should have all been indicted for abuse of power.
Derp State
 
And then there's Durham...

This guy violated the law:

5f6321c357b7da001ee12207


Yabba dabba doo
 
No. The default is legitimate.
You’re claiming otherwise.
Stop being a bitch and show your evidence or STFU. :rolleyes:
How do you figure that's the default? If they decline to explain it, then the default is that it's illegitimate. Legitimate business owners don't hesitate to tell people what their business does. Only criminals do.

Biden is a crook, and everyone who defends him is a scumbag.
 

Forum List

Back
Top