Mojo2
Gold Member
- Oct 28, 2013
- 6,210
- 1,026
- 190
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
"Since you are not a citizen of America (unless you happen to be one of the Iranian gang posting now), how would you know what Americans would approve of when it comes to people in the government."
Of course I am an American citizen. What gave you the idea I wasn't.
I am basing statement regarding Americans not happy with dual citizenship on a recent Rasmussen Poll where only 34% of Americans approved of dual citizenship, 54% were against and 12% undecided.
"Rasmussen Poll: 54 Percent Reject Dual Citizenship"
"A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 54% of voters donÂ’t think potential U.S. citizens should be allowed to maintain dual citizenship. Another 12% are undecided."
Rasmussen Poll: 54 Percent Reject Dual Citizenship | VDARE.com
Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 63,201
- 20,379
- 2,250
So? It would be natural for citizens of any country to dislike somebody having a second nationality. I'm surprised it's not higher.
But why did you only post a list of dual nationality Jews, in true Nazi fashion?
jillian
Princess
because he's posting from VDARE.... a white nationalist site.
someone should tell him they don't like him either.
Say, Roudy if the one from the Boiler Room has taken its turn and claiming it is an American citizen, it must be one of the Iranian gang. God only knows from where the rest of the Boiler Room gang is located. Probably a lot of them are in Great Brain. Meanwhile, Roudy, a lot of people who have at least one Irish grandparent are now applying for citizenship with Ireland also (Italian-Americans say they are doing it too. In fact, when I used to read the Bronx Message Board, the Irish-Americans and Italian-American posters were telling the others how to go about it. Even my husband was kidding around a couple of weeks ago saying maybe he should apply for dual citizenship with Canada since his great great uncle was the first French speaking prime minister of Canada. Do you think that anyone here in America really cares what these Irish-Americans or Italian-Americans are doing with regard to dual citizenship. It is only the Islmofascists like Haniya and the rest of the Boiler Room who are constantly bringing up this Israeli dual citizenship baloney. One thing we know -- our Intelligence Agencies are not picking up Jews with dual citizenship, but Muslims living here who were planning to commit an atrocity upon American citizens.
proudveteran06
Silver Member
- Sep 12, 2012
- 2,565
- 482
- 98
I am referring to THIS Country denying dual citizenship to Anybody including Muslims who IMMIGRATE here
proudveteran06
Silver Member
- Sep 12, 2012
- 2,565
- 482
- 98
All of the yellow above by treaty and ownership.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Line_(Israel)
While the line is only an armistice demarcation line,[9] in practice it is used to differentiate between those areas which are administered as part of Israel, and the areas outside it, which are administered by the Israeli military or the Palestinian Authority.[10][11] The extended municipality of Jerusalem constitutes one exception to this: although the parts occupied by Jordan until 1967 fall outside the Green Line,
Too bad the Palestinian doesn't know how to read; Everybody except him considers W. Jerusalem part of Israel
His map doesn't show Jerusalem to be in " palestine" either
"MOST" everybody else feels the same way, and moves are underway to reverse Islamic migration to the west. The first signs of trouble in the UK and the muslims demand round the clock armed protection. Now the police are refusing and just driving past a couple of times a day.
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
It reeks of Israeli theft of a Nation, everybody can see that except the Emperor's of Zion.
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
Because it is illegal for U.S. Government officials to be dual nationals, except for Israeli as the second citizenship. I posted the court case that decided that.
What legitimate nation has been stolen then, as no one but mind warped muslims can see any.
proudveteran06
Silver Member
- Sep 12, 2012
- 2,565
- 482
- 98
Peebel with his stupid responses .
How full of shit you are Peebel... How full of SHIT...
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
When the Muslims left the Saudi Peninsula and invaded those surrounding countries, they were busy forcing people to convert to Islam and killed many who refused. The descendents of those who were lucky to survive can't even practice their religious beliefs in peace now. Look at what happens to the Copts, Assyrians and Chaldeans even now in this modern world. However, the Boiler Room Gang doesn't care what happens to these people in the Middle East. It is more important for them to demonize Israel, a tiny, tiny piece of land compared to the huge Muslim Middle East and a place where the Arabs have it so much better than in the rest of the Middle East.
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,401
- 4,881
- 1,815
So, if that is not a political or territorial boundary, where is Israel?
All of the yellow above by treaty and ownership.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Line_(Israel)
While the line is only an armistice demarcation line,[9] in practice it is used to differentiate between those areas which are administered as part of Israel, and the areas outside it, which are administered by the Israeli military or the Palestinian Authority.[10][11] The extended municipality of Jerusalem constitutes one exception to this: although the parts occupied by Jordan until 1967 fall outside the Green Line,
Too bad the Palestinian doesn't know how to read; Everybody except him considers W. Jerusalem part of Israel
His map doesn't show Jerusalem to be in " palestine" either
This one does. Palestine's international boundaries are marked: +-+-+-+-+
Don't be confused by the solid lines and colors. Those are just from the failed partition plan.
Last edited:
Hossfly
ZIONIST
Some people think it's in Florida. There's a big sign over the fireplace in a restaurant there that says: "We wandered in the desert for 40 years, then we found Boca Raton".
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
" palestine" which never existed ( And never will )
Palestine was Palestine for over 2,000 years. Since 135 AD.
Palestina en el Imperio Romano
When the Muslims left the Saudi Peninsula and invaded those surrounding countries, they were busy forcing people to convert to Islam and killed many who refused. The descendents of those who were lucky to survive can't even practice their religious beliefs in peace now. Look at what happens to the Copts, Assyrians and Chaldeans even now in this modern world. However, the Boiler Room Gang doesn't care what happens to these people in the Middle East. It is more important for them to demonize Israel, a tiny, tiny piece of land compared to the huge Muslim Middle East and a place where the Arabs have it so much better than in the rest of the Middle East.
Most of us just want justice for the Palestinians. Most of us neutrals, particularly us Christians, are very concerned about the treatment of Christians in Muslim majority societies. This does not prevent us from being concerned with the Christian and Muslim Palestinians.
When Constantine made Christianity the religion of the Empire people were forced to adopt Christianity by force.
Contrary to popular belief the citizens/subjects of the Roman Empire (Byzantine) were not very happy with Roman rule and converted to Islam without needing to be forced.
I realize you probably eschew academic peer reviewed historical works, but this dissertation (or thesis) from Yale is interesting. I've posted excerpts and the link is below if you want to learn something instead of repeating propaganda.
I find this very telling and surprising:
"There were clear fiscal incentives not to encourage the spread of Islam. As we have seen, Quran itself had laid down that the unbelievers should pay taxes, called jizya, which was originally a generic name for tribute of all sorts. By the period in the late eighth century when the Muslim fiscal system reached its maturity, it had been established that the dhimmis should pay a poll-tax. All landowners were now obliged to pay the kharaj or land tax but the dhimmis suffered under extra fiscal burdens."
Here is another excerpt:
"The nature of the early Muslim conquests in the Middle East made forcible conversion
almost impossible. The Muslim armies were comparatively small, between ten and twenty
thousand are possible estimates for the numbers in the armies which conquered Syria and Iraq, probably fewer in Egypt and Iran. To be sure, more Arab Muslims emigrated from Arabia to settle in the newly conquered areas but even so the Arab Muslims were a small minority, perhaps 10% of the population of Egypt and perhaps 20% of the most densely settled area, Iraq. In these circumstances, forcing unwilling people to convert was out of the question. According to the traditional accounts, much of the Arab conquests was achieved by treaty and we have texts of many of these agreement. Here, for example is the treaty that was made by the Caliph Umar with Sophronius, Patriarch of Jerusalem, probably 638:
“In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. This is the assurance of safety
(amān) which the servant of God Umar, the Commander of the Faithful, has given to the people of Jerusalem.. He has given them an assurance of safety for themselves, for their property, their churches, their crosses, the sick and healthy of the city and for all the rituals which belong to their religion. Their churches will not be inhabited by Muslims and will not be destroyed. Neither they, nor the land on which they stand, nor their cross, nor their property will be damaged. They will not be forcibly converted. No Jew will live with them in Jerusalem. The people of Jerusalem must pay the poll-tax like the people of other cities and must expel the Byzantines and the robbers. Those of the people of Jerusalem who want to leave with the Byzantines, take their property and................"
http://www.yale.edu/macmillan/rps/kennedy.pdf
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Line_(Israel)
While the line is only an armistice demarcation line,[9] in practice it is used to differentiate between those areas which are administered as part of Israel, and the areas outside it, which are administered by the Israeli military or the Palestinian Authority.[10][11] The extended municipality of Jerusalem constitutes one exception to this: although the parts occupied by Jordan until 1967 fall outside the Green Line,
Too bad the Palestinian doesn't know how to read; Everybody except him considers W. Jerusalem part of Israel
His map doesn't show Jerusalem to be in " palestine" either
This one does. Palestine's international boundaries are marked: +-+-+-+-+
Don't be confused by the solid lines and colors. Those are just from the failed partition plan.
Thise are NOT PALESTINES BORDERS. The map shows proposed borders.
And if it is Palestines borders, than why can't you find a current map of Palestine that clearly marks the international boundaries, like I have dine with Israel??
Answer: because it doesn't exist
Some people think it's in Florida. There's a big sign over the fireplace in a restaurant there that says: "We wandered in the desert for 40 years, then we found Boca Raton".
Just to show you how little Tinmore knows, he is saying that the Armistice lines are still in effect, when they were signed wayyyy before Israels new agreements with Jordan and Egypt. These agreements were actually U.N written treaties that clearly tell us about Israels INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED BORDERS WITH EGYPT (1979) and JORDAN (1994).
He keeps bringing up the armistice agreements as if they have any merit today.
And even after I prove him wrong, he still spews the same armistice bullshit.
Last edited:
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Liberal government appeals ruling against use of Emergencies Act to Supreme Court- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 2
-
-
Feminists ask a Female CEO why she doesn't hire all women at her company- Started by LibertyWeeps
- Replies: 7
-
Would Americans support US troops seizing and occupying Kharg Island ?- Started by yidnar
- Replies: 51
