January 6 Committee…what a joke!

[struth]

How did you determine Biden lied about knowledge of the raid?

Here the White House claimed they weren’t aware

WATCH: White House says they were not given a 'heads up' about the FBI's Mar-a-Lago search

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre says neither President Joe Biden nor anyone at the White House "was given a heads up" about the FBI's search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence.

www.pbs.org

Here’s the facts showing they lied

Exclusive | Biden White House coordinated on raid of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago then took convo ‘offline’: ex-DOJ official

“The White House not only knew about it, they were coordinating it,” former DOJ chief of staff Chad Mizelle told The Post in an exclusive interview.

nypost.com

New FBI memos suggest Biden knew about 2022 Mar-a-Lago search despite denials

Newly released memos from the FB appear to show that former President Joe Biden knew about the agency's search of President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property.

komonews.com

 

[Marener]

It must be illegal if they had to return the documents to Trump.

Trump has access to the documents because he’s president. Has nothing to do with the search warrant being legal or illegal.

The evidence was sitting right there in plain sight.
Ignorance is no excuse except if you're in a rigged system like we were at the time.

Not at all. If the system is rigged, why aren’t you asking why Trump’s DoJ has rigged it for Biden?

 

[Marener]

Not a former president

Nope. Presidents are required to turn over all government documents to NARA.

It’s well within their rights to make the request.

 

[Alweysrite!]

How did you determine Biden lied about knowledge of the raid?

I am curious as to why Biden lied about it. The evidence is strong against you.

DOJ sought to ‘brief’ Biden on Mar-a-Lago raid before search — didn’t ‘give a damn about the optics’

The FBI officials also noted “[c]oordination with DOJ and WH Counsel” ahead of the Aug. 8, 2022, search.

nypost.com

 

[Alweysrite!]

Nope. Presidents are required to turn over all government documents to NARA.

It’s well within their rights to make the request.

It's within Trump's rights to deny the request.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Here the White House claimed they weren’t aware

WATCH: White House says they were not given a 'heads up' about the FBI's Mar-a-Lago search

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre says neither President Joe Biden nor anyone at the White House "was given a heads up" about the FBI's search of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence.

www.pbs.org

Here’s the facts showing they lied

Exclusive | Biden White House coordinated on raid of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago then took convo ‘offline’: ex-DOJ official

“The White House not only knew about it, they were coordinating it,” former DOJ chief of staff Chad Mizelle told The Post in an exclusive interview.

nypost.com

New FBI memos suggest Biden knew about 2022 Mar-a-Lago search despite denials

Newly released memos from the FB appear to show that former President Joe Biden knew about the agency's search of President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property.

komonews.com

I really do wonder why. Mariner? Can you come up with an answer?

 

[Hollie]

The FBI executed a search warrant which turned up hundreds of documents that Trump was legally obligated to turn over.

That’s called obstruction of justice.

The FBI was also rummaging through Melania’s underwear.


That’s called creepy.

 

[struth]

The FBI was also rummaging through Melania’s underwear.


That’s called creepy.

Well we know that wasn’t on Joey xiden’s order, he’s only interested in little girl panties

 

[Doc7505]

Two things.

You are saying that history won't judge a sitting president refusing to relinquish power after losing the election? Culminating in a full-blown insurrection that wounded 140 police officers? But rather the investigation of those things in congress?

Secondly. I love all of you moaning "oh this is so partisan" while it was YOUR side that nixed the idea of a non-lawmaker commission consisting of people chosen by Democrats and Republicans equally. You guys are like pyromaniacs complaining that the fire department didn't put out a fire in time that they set.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Iran is signaling that it will flout the newly brokered ceasefire agreement, raising fresh concerns about stability in one of the world's most critical energy corridors.
The ceasefire, which officially began on Wednesday following negotiations led by President Donald Trump, was intended to de-escalate weeks of conflict and restore normal maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump had emphasized that the ceasefire would reopen the "free trade across the Strait of Hormuz," framing the agreement as a step toward restoring global supply chains.
On Wednesday, Tehran only allowed 12 cargo tankers to pass through the strait.
This sharply contrasts with pre-conflict levels, when more than 100 vessels could transit the strategic waterway daily without interference.
Under international shipping rules, including widely recognized conventions governing open waterways, countries are not permitted to impose fees on transit through natural straits like Hormuz.
Iran's actions therefore represent not only a challenge to the ceasefire agreement but also a broader breach of global legal norms.
With Vice President JD Vance in Islamabad on Friday for direct negotiations with Iran, the coming days will be critical in determining whether diplomatic efforts can restore genuine freedom of navigation or whether the region is headed toward renewed confrontation.
Despite objections and shouts of failure, Vance’s appearance and efforts here will be highlighted in 2028. If he pulls it off successfully, it will be a big plus, if he doesn’t, well, don’t need to say more.
There're reports that Vance may not go there due to security concerns. Pretty smart.
Iran seems to want to die on their hill. Trump will gladly accommodate them.
Iranian delegates are masters of delay tactics, and they will try to hold out till the mid-terms.
Meanwhile, Democrats are assisting our enemy each step of the way.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Trump has access to the documents because he’s president. Has nothing to do with the search warrant being legal or illegal.

Not at all. If the system is rigged, why aren’t you asking why Trump’s DoJ has rigged it for Biden?

Trump has access to the documents because he’s president. Has nothing to do with the search warrant being legal or illegal.

They had to return the documents so it must have been an illegal search and seizure. Did you say why Biden lied about it?

Not at all. If the system is rigged, why aren’t you asking why Trump’s DoJ has rigged it for Biden?

Ignorance is no excuse to break the law unless you were a democrat at the time I guess

 

[Marener]

I am curious as to why Biden lied about it. The evidence is strong against you.

There’s no evidence in this email whatsoever. A bunch of right wing hacks have convinced you otherwise.

This email comes from May 2022, way before the search warrant was ever even drafted.

It has to do with an executive privilege challenge that Trump tried to use to prevent NARA from sharing the documents with the DoJ. They couldn’t do so unless Biden waived the privilege, which he deferred to the lawyer at NARA.

This is all well known, and detailed in this letter to Trump’s lawyers.

https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/wall-letter-to-evan-corcoran-re-trump-boxes-05.10.2022.pdf

Has absolutely nothing to do with the search warrant. The dates don’t match up at all.

 

[Marener]

They had to return the documents so it must have been an illegal search and seizure.

Nope. That’s really faulty logic.

Did you say why Biden lied about it?

He didn’t. Your sources are misleading you.

Ignorance is no excuse to break the law unless you were a democrat at the time I guess

Sometimes it is, actually.

 

[Marener]

It's within Trump's rights to deny the request.

Maybe. We never had a former president who wanted to violate the law before so it would have been further adjudicated in court.

It probably will since Trump has indicated he does not intent to follow the law.

 

[struth]

They had to return the documents so it must have been an illegal search and seizure. Did you say why Biden lied about it?

Ignorance is no excuse to break the law unless you were a democrat at the time I guess

Marener like a good little Jim jones dem will deflect and deny despite the evidence and continue to push debunked propaganda

 

[Delldude]

If there were better evidence of a crime, his memory would be irrelevant.

Not playing with a full deck.

PBS:

In the report, Hur said that it could be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Biden intended to keep the documents, which is the standard for conviction in a criminal case. In part, he argued, jurors could be swayed that Biden's age made him seem forgetful, and there was the possibility for "innocent explanations" for the mishandling of any records.

"Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," Hur wrote in his report.

In his interviews, Biden repeatedly told prosecutors that he did not know how classified documents ended up at his home and former Penn Biden Center office in Washington.


"I have no idea," he said.

 

[Marener]

Not playing with a full deck.

PBS:

In the report, Hur said that it could be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Biden intended to keep the documents, which is the standard for conviction in a criminal case. In part, he argued, jurors could be swayed that Biden's age made him seem forgetful, and there was the possibility for "innocent explanations" for the mishandling of any records.
"Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," Hur wrote in his report.

In his interviews, Biden repeatedly told prosecutors that he did not know how classified documents ended up at his home and former Penn Biden Center office in Washington.


"I have no idea," he said.

If Hur had better evidence, it wouldn’t be so hard to prove he willingly retained them. He didn’t. His evidence consistent almost entirely of one offhand comment to his ghostwriter.

For example, if Biden had gotten a subpoena for the documents and was caught on security footage moving them around his house before handing over a few of them and claiming he looked everywhere, only to find out he was just hiding a bunch of them.

That would hypothetically be very strong evidence that he was willfully retaining them.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Nope. That’s really faulty logic.

He didn’t. Your sources are misleading you.

My sources are correct. Biden was quite possibly the most dishonest President we have ever had in the Oval Office or in the fake one that he had built for whatever reason I don't know. I don't think he was really in charge. The whole thing was a hoax for people like you.

You are saying that history won't judge a sitting president refusing to relinquish power after losing the election? Culminating in a full-blown insurrection that

This didn't happen. So history has nothing to judge.

wounded 140 police officers? But rather the investigation of those things in congress?

What about the peaceful protesters your officers wounded and killed? You don't give a shit about them

Secondly. I love all of you moaning "oh this is so partisan" while it was YOUR side that nixed the idea of a non-lawmaker commission consisting of people chosen by Democrats and Republicans equally. You guys

This committee was not chosen by Democrats and Republicans equally. It was chosen by Nancy Pelosi in purely partisan fashion.

Nope. That’s really faulty logic.

If they were illegal they could not have been given back. Faulty premise on your part

He didn’t. Your sources are misleading you.

Sources are correct. He lied, and it's been proven. Why do you think he would? I could tell you but that would be to easy on you.

Sometimes it is, actually.

Not if you or I try it LOL. "Sorry officer I didn't know it was a school zone!" (As he's writing you a fat ticket).
Sorry son ignorance is no excuse for the law

 

[Clipper]

The FBI was also rummaging through Melania’s underwear.


That’s called creepy.

If that's true, they had more access to them then Trump does.

 

[Marener]

If they were illegal they could not have been given back. Faulty premise on your part

Sources are correct. He lied, and it's been proven. Why do you think he would? I could tell you but that would be to easy on you.

Not if you were I try it LOL. Sorry officer I didn't know it was a school zone! (As he's writing you a fat ticket).

It hasn’t been proven at all. This email that they’re pointing to doesn’t say anything about a search warrant or raid of Mar a Lago. They put that in your head.

It does mention privilege and we are well aware that there was an issue with executive privilege in April and May before the investigation could even begin as detailed in the letter I already linked to.

You’re the one lying.

 

[Alweysrite!]

It hasn’t been proven at all. This email that they’re pointing to doesn’t say anything about a search warrant or raid of Mar a Lago. They put that in your head.

It does mention privilege and we are well aware that there was an issue with executive privilege in April and May before the investigation could even begin as detailed in the letter I already linked to.

You’re the one lying.

Biden knew the raid was going down and lied about it. Why do you think that is? Why are you lying?