January 6 Committee…what a joke!

Your MAGA religious beliefs are truth, cult member.
I have to take that claim back, Joe Biden didn't steal the 2020 election, it was the DNC who did and they used Biden as a puppet taking advantage of his being a nice elderly man with a poor memory.

I'm not MAGA.
 
I have to take that claim back, Joe Biden didn't steal the 2020 election, it was the DNC who did and they used Biden as a puppet taking advantage of his being a nice elderly man with a poor memory.

I'm not MAGA.
If you look deep into your MAGA bible, perhaps you can even find the evidence to support that.
 
False. NARA was looking for a few high profile documents that it knew it was missing and it took nearly a year for Trump to send him anything. Bad start, clearly not cooperating.

NARA told the FBI because that’s what anyone would do if they found classified documents in those boxes.

False. The FBI came to Mar a Lago to accept the documents that Trump was legally required to turn over. His lawyer certified that they did a complete search of the property and all documents were in the envelope they handed over.

They were allowed to look in the storage room but explicitly prevented by Trump’s lawyers from looking in any box.

False. The DoJ rightly suspected Trump was not being cooperative and after investigation discovered enough evidence to get a search warrant and search the property.

They were proven correct in their suspicions when they turned up many documents that Trump was legally required to have already turned over.


Sometimes the bad guy gets away with the crime. If Trump hadn’t been elected, the documents would have never been turned over and the decision by the questionable hack Cannon would have been appealed.
What leftist TDS democrat activitist told NARA that Trump stole documents? Did NARA first break the story or did some democrat post Biden inauguration hack create the explosive drama by using NARA to try to frame Trump for crimes he did not commit? Biden illegally took documents home over a period of decades that he was not authorized to take and nobody at NARA said a thing. Is the democrat party weaponizing government agencies to go after enemies of the democrat party?

2012 case in which federal judge ruled that NARA does not have the authority to seize presidential records - SearchTop of Form



2012 case in which federal judge ruled that NARA does not have the authority to seize presidential records

Bottom of Form​
2012 Case: Judicial Watch v. NARA

In Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration (845 F.Supp.2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012)), a federal district court ruled that the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) does not have the authority to seize presidential records from a former president.

Background

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, sued NARA to compel the agency to designate certain audiotapes made by historian Taylor Branch during Bill Clinton’s presidency as “presidential records” under the Presidential Records Act (PRA). The group sought that NARA assume custody and control of the tapes and deposit them in the Clinton Presidential Library vLex+1.

The tapes, reportedly stored in Clinton’s sock drawer at one point, were created during official duties and contained some of Clinton’s telephone conversations. Judicial Watch argued they should be treated as official records and made available to the public POLITICO.

Court’s Ruling

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson dismissed the case, holding that:

    • NARA lacks statutory authority to seize presidential records from a former president. The PRA allows NARA to request the Attorney General to recover records, but it does not mandate that NARA invoke this process — the agency has complete discretion on whether and when to act vLex+1.
    • The tapes were not in NARA’s custody and had never been transferred to the Archives.
    • Judicial Watch could not identify any remedy the court could order that NARA was legally obligated to perform vLex.
Jackson also noted that the PRA gives the president sole discretion to determine what is “personal” versus “presidential” and to destroy or declassify records during their term. This discretion is “far-reaching” and “mostly unchallengeable” in court Just The News.

Significance
 
False. The DoJ rightly suspected Trump was not being cooperative and after investigation discovered enough evidence to get a search warrant and search the property.

They were proven correct in their suspicions when they turned up many documents that Trump was legally required to have already turned over.
After the illegitimate Biden regime was dethroned responsible investigators discovered that the Mar-A-Lago raid was a democrat fishing expedition deliberately framed and executed by agents under the authoprity orf criminal leftist democrat activists. Jack Smith, the illegally appointed and later fired DA who brought the illegitimate charges against Trump was forced to admit he planted evidence at Mar-A-Lago to create the false public perception that he was simply seeking justice, not seeking to destroy enemies of the democrat party.

Jack Smith Officially Admits the FBI Tampered with Evidence In Mar-a-Lago Raid

written by J Pelkey June 25, 2024 0 comment

Share 0FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail



Special Counsel Jack Smith responded to President Trump’s motion to dismiss the classified documents case based on the “spoliation” of evidence.

Jack Smith admitted that the FBI staged photos of classified documents during the Mar-a-Lago raid.

The FBI took photos of the documents with cover sheets and publicly released them to damage Trump.
 
What leftist TDS democrat activitist told NARA that Trump stole documents?
The method by which NARA became aware of there being missing documents is immaterial to the fact trump had taken them.

Timeline: DOJ's criminal inquiry into Trump taking classified documents to Mar-a-Lago​

May 2021
An official from NARA contacts Trump's team after realizing that several important documents weren't handed over before Trump left the White House. In hopes of locating the missing items, NARA lawyer Gary Stern reaches out to someone who served in the White House counsel's office under Trump, who was the point of contact for recordkeeping matters. The missing documents include some of Trump's correspondence with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as well as the map of Hurricane Dorian that Trump infamously altered with a sharpie pen.

Fall 2021
NARA grows frustrated with the slow pace of document turnover after several months of conversations with the Trump team. Stern reaches out to another Trump attorney to intervene. The archivist asks about several boxes of records that were apparently taken to Mar-a-Lago during Trump's relocation to Florida. NARA still doesn't receive the White House documents they are searching for.

 
Jack Smith Officially Admits the FBI Tampered with Evidence In Mar-a-Lago Raid
As you know, that's horseshit.



Nothing you have posted on this thread so far comes close to the truth. But keep right on lying. I enjoy humiliating you.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of fishy things going on in DC and with the democrat party.
Judge who OK’d Mar-a-Lago raid Obama donor once linked to Jeffrey Epstein
No amount of smears against those involved in the classified docs case can change the essential facts. 1. trump stole classified documents. 2. He refused to fully comply with a subpoena for their return.
 
What leftist TDS democrat activitist told NARA that Trump stole documents? Did NARA first break the story or did some democrat post Biden inauguration hack create the explosive drama by using NARA to try to frame Trump for crimes he did not commit? Biden illegally took documents home over a period of decades that he was not authorized to take and nobody at NARA said a thing. Is the democrat party weaponizing government agencies to go after enemies of the democrat party?

2012 case in which federal judge ruled that NARA does not have the authority to seize presidential records - SearchTop of Form



2012 case in which federal judge ruled that NARA does not have the authority to seize presidential records

Bottom of Form​
2012 Case: Judicial Watch v. NARA

In Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration (845 F.Supp.2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012)), a federal district court ruled that the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) does not have the authority to seize presidential records from a former president.

Background

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, sued NARA to compel the agency to designate certain audiotapes made by historian Taylor Branch during Bill Clinton’s presidency as “presidential records” under the Presidential Records Act (PRA). The group sought that NARA assume custody and control of the tapes and deposit them in the Clinton Presidential Library vLex+1.

The tapes, reportedly stored in Clinton’s sock drawer at one point, were created during official duties and contained some of Clinton’s telephone conversations. Judicial Watch argued they should be treated as official records and made available to the public POLITICO.

Court’s Ruling

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson dismissed the case, holding that:

    • NARA lacks statutory authority to seize presidential records from a former president. The PRA allows NARA to request the Attorney General to recover records, but it does not mandate that NARA invoke this process — the agency has complete discretion on whether and when to act vLex+1.
    • The tapes were not in NARA’s custody and had never been transferred to the Archives.
    • Judicial Watch could not identify any remedy the court could order that NARA was legally obligated to perform vLex.
Jackson also noted that the PRA gives the president sole discretion to determine what is “personal” versus “presidential” and to destroy or declassify records during their term. This discretion is “far-reaching” and “mostly unchallengeable” in court Just The News.

Significance
NARA was looking for some very important and well known presidential records, and figured out they were missing.

Specifically they asked for the letter from Kim Jong Un which Trump had taken when he left office.

Once NARA got the boxes and found the classified documents, they elevated it to the DoJ who started the investigation.
 
It's freaking SICK that the demented LEFT went completely SOVIET to try to stop Trump in so many ways.
The whole Russia Russia Russia HOAX.
Their J/6 FEDSURRECTION REICHSTAG FIRE set-up.
The Mara Lago RAID.
The NY FAKE felonies.
The FAKE estimation of Mara Lago cost SCAM trial.
ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS.
Federal district rogue judges' INTERFERENCES.
Holy shit, it's AMAZING.

And all that un-American BULLSHIT got him REELECTED.

There BETTER be a Righteous Reckoning coming for the SCUMBAGS responsible..... :evil:
 
NARA was looking for some very important and well known presidential records, and figured out they were missing.

Specifically they asked for the letter from Kim Jong Un which Trump had taken when he left office.

Once NARA got the boxes and found the classified documents, they elevated it to the DoJ who started the investigation.
The more markef posts the more the conspiratorial nature of his beliefs is revealed. He has immersed himself in propaganda, clinging to it like a life raft in a sea of facts that refute his beliefs.
 
15th post
The more markef posts the more the conspiratorial nature of his beliefs is revealed. He has immersed himself in propaganda, clinging to it like a life raft in a sea of facts that refute his beliefs.
♨️GASLIGHT THEATRE BULLSHIT OVERLOAD♨️

Stalinberg is a--------------> 🤡

🙄
 
The more markef posts the more the conspiratorial nature of his beliefs is revealed. He has immersed himself in propaganda, clinging to it like a life raft in a sea of facts that refute his beliefs.
This case is emblematic of the strategy to “get the lie out first”.

People have a natural tenancy to maintain a belief in the first thing they hear and it’s hard to change their minds later.
 
This case is emblematic of the strategy to “get the lie out first”.

People have a natural tenancy to maintain a belief in the first thing they hear and it’s hard to change their minds later.
Explaining why Billy the Bagman was so eager to mis-characterize Mueller's report as exonerating trump before the public could see for itself the report did nothing of the kind.
 
The method by which NARA became aware of there being missing documents is immaterial to the fact trump had taken them.

Timeline: DOJ's criminal inquiry into Trump taking classified documents to Mar-a-Lago​

May 2021
An official from NARA contacts Trump's team after realizing that several important documents weren't handed over before Trump left the White House. In hopes of locating the missing items, NARA lawyer Gary Stern reaches out to someone who served in the White House counsel's office under Trump, who was the point of contact for recordkeeping matters. The missing documents include some of Trump's correspondence with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as well as the map of Hurricane Dorian that Trump infamously altered with a sharpie pen.

Fall 2021
NARA grows frustrated with the slow pace of document turnover after several months of conversations with the Trump team. Stern reaches out to another Trump attorney to intervene. The archivist asks about several boxes of records that were apparently taken to Mar-a-Lago during Trump's relocation to Florida. NARA still doesn't receive the White House documents they are searching for.

Jan 2022
NARA retrieved boxes from Trump.

February 2022
NARA had retrieved all documents it felt had been taken but someone involved from the Biden administration was not sure NARA had retrieved all documents taken so that unknown leftist urged NARA to refer the matter to the DOJ. Clearly the matter is not that NARA has claimed Trump is withholding specific documents they want back but someone is referring the matter to Biden's DOJ to see if they can get a legal warrant to rifle through every home Trump owned in their search for something they could charge Trump with. What that means is that someone suspected there may be more documents that NARA did not know about in Trump's possession so the democrats in Biden's administration used that opportunity and suspicion to instigate a full-blown raid by armed FBI agents with shoot to kill orders.

That had nothing to do with NARA documents and everything to do with corrupt weaponization of Biden departments in an all-out effort to destroy Trump.

Neither NARA nor democrats cared at all about the trove of secret documents Biden had illegally taken and stashed in his office shared by Communist Chinese spies, but they were hell-bent on continuing rifling through Trump's properties everywhere to see if they could possibly find other documents they thought he might be keeping that the democrats could charge him for. That is how the Biden administration weaponized government agencies went after Trump like armed Nazi Gestapo goons.
 
Back
Top Bottom