What did Trump lie about? Who swore in Jack Smith and was it done legally? Why can Jack Smith not remember if he was sworn in or not and cannot remember who might have sworn him in, unless he was never sworn in?
January 6 Committee…what a joke!
- Thread starter Roudy
- Start date
I don't repeat myself unecessarily and endlessly like you trumpers do. You really follow trump to a tee. We all make mistakes ; yours was picking trump in the first place., mine is probably engaging you fools.
That's rich. Democrats accuse Trump of a multitude of crimes they claim they do not have to outline or prove.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
The allegations with respect to Artic Frost are horseshit.Here are some of the facts of democrat misconduct in their weaponized war against Trump:
what did jack smithy do that was illegal
200
View attachment 1241029
Like
Dislike
Allegations of Illegal Conduct by Jack Smith
Recent reports allege that former Special Counsel Jack Smith engaged in actions that critics say were unlawful and politically motivated during his January 6 investigation.
According to newly released FBI documents obtained by Senator Chuck Grassley, Smith authorized the FBI to surveil the private phone communications of nearly a dozen Republican U.S. senators in 2023 National Legal And Policy Center. The surveillance was part of what critics call the “Arctic Frost” sub-investigation, which focused on communications between GOP lawmakers and former President Donald Trump on the evening of January 6, 2021, as the Capitol riot unfolded National Legal And Policy Center+1.
The FBI used court orders to seize and analyze call records from senators such as Ron Johnson, Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee, and others, mapping out who spoke to whom and when National Legal And Policy Center. Critics argue this was an abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, as it targeted members of Congress—co-equal branches of government—without clear evidence of criminal activity American Center for Law and Justice.
Supporters of the investigation say it was a legitimate probe into potential criminal conduct, but opponents—including the American Center for Law and Justice—claim it was weaponized to interfere in the 2024 election. They note that the “Arctic Frost” investigation began in April 2022 and that Smith collected the phone records in September 2023, just before the election season American Center for Law and Justice.
Other allegations against Smith include:These actions have drawn sharp criticism from Republican lawmakers, who have called the FBI’s conduct “Biden’s Stasi” tactics and “abuse of power beyond Watergate” National Legal And Policy Center. Critics argue that Smith’s conduct crossed the line from lawful investigation into political retaliation.
- Filing two high-profile indictments against Trump—classified documents and January 6 charges—dismissed on presidential immunity grounds, which critics say were timed to harm Trump’s 2024 campaign National Legal And Policy Center.
- Pushing for a gag order that restricted Trump’s free speech during his campaign National Legal And Policy Center.
- Coordinating with the FBI to raid Rudy Giuliani’s home and subpoena journalists and tech companies National Legal And Policy Center.
It is important to note that these allegations are contested. The Justice Department and some legal experts maintain that the investigations were within the scope of Smith’s authority as Special Counsel, though his appointment itself has been challenged as potentially unconstitutional ABA Journal.
Fact-checking Hawley's claims that the FBI 'tapped' his and other senators' phones
Legal experts said Hawley misused the term "tapping" to describe the data searches.
www.pbs.org
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
There are plenty of crimes for which he was convicted and for which he was indicted. The details of all of them are readily available.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
Most defendants would have been found guilty of contempt of court and spent time in jail if they had said half the things trump did during his trials.
Are you suggesting Trump never agreed to return documents that the NARA delineated? That is false. Garland's broad search warrant did not list specific documents but amounted to an unlimited raid of Trump's property in search of anything democrats could use to hang Trump, whether related to requested documents or not. If securing secret documents was so important then why did the democrats not go after Biden for illegally taking home secret documents and then storing them for years in an office he shared with Communist Chinese spies?
The old mortgage fraud crimes mortgage fraudster James charged Trump with were alleged crimes known to Obama that Obama never charged Trump with committing because there was no basis for charges.The evidence of his crimes was overwhelming. Other people in NY who were charged and convicted of similar crimes spent time in jail.
Nearly half of people convicted of the same crimes as Donald Trump are sent to prison, study finds
Nearly half of people convicted of the same crimes as Trump go to jail, study finds
Trump is set to be sentenced on November 26www.independent.co.uk
Again, you prove nothing.
The allegations with respect to Artic Frost are horseshit.
Fact-checking Hawley's claims that the FBI 'tapped' his and other senators' phones
Legal experts said Hawley misused the term "tapping" to describe the data searches.
Biden FBI spied on eight GOP senators, damning new doc claims: ‘Arguably worse than Watergate’
Specific reasons for the FBI’s espionage of the sitting lawmakers are not clear. The document revealing the spy effort was recently turned over to lawmakers and Senate Judiciary Committee Cha…
nypost.com
Biden FBI spied on eight GOP senators, damning new doc claims: ‘Arguably worse than Watergate’
ByRyan King
Published Oct. 6, 2025, 5:28 p.m. ET
Democrats claim hundreds of Americans are wrongly convicted in the US each year. We can add Trump's wrongful convictions to that number.
Charges and convictions may radically widely vary according to political bias.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
Sounds like lawfare.
AI Overview
Jack Smith was appointed Special Counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland on November 18, 2022. While Smith signed an oath upon his appointment, the specific official who administered the oath in November 2022 is not publicly recalled, and a second oath was administered nearly 11 months later to ensure compliance.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
Charges of political bias are really all you folks have since the actual evidence is stacked against trump.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
Former President Donald Trump is still partly barred from speaking about his New York criminal trial after an appeals court decision denied his attempt to lift the gag order.
On Thursday, a New York appeals panel decided to uphold the remainder of the gag order, which bars Trump from speaking about prosecutors, court staff or their families. Trump’s lawyers had requested the gag order be lifted this time in order to campaign against Vice President Harris.
Cuz he was putting their safety in jeopardy.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 34,487
- 28,063
- 2,820
Actually, we can't. trump had the best lawyers his money could buy (some law firms refused to represent him because of the stench) and was afforded every opportunity, more than most, to defend himself. If anything he was given preferential treatment.
Yes, everyone makes judgments about credibility. The difference is whether you apply a method and try to correct for your own bias.
Let’s make it concrete. The January 6 Committee concluded that Donald Trump engaged in a sustained effort to overturn the election results.
I consider that credible based on multiple independent lines of evidence:
-His own public statements
-Over 60 court cases, heard by judges from both parties, rejecting fraud claims
-Testimony from his own DOJ leadership
-Statements from Republican state election officials
-Testimony under oath from people like Rudy Giuliani and Ivanka Trump
-Direct observation of events on January 6.
-Reams of memo's and false elector slates.
Many of these sources had incentives to contradict these conclusions and didn’t.
So this isn’t just ‘my opinion.’ It’s a conclusion based on converging evidence from multiple, independent, and in most cases adverse sources.
So what is your standard for credibility and can you debunk mine.
Something is not right. Garland claims he signed Smith into office the first time but Smith does not remember that so Garland signed him in again 11 months later and Smith cannot remember that either.
Yes, the corrupt biased leftist radicalized weaponized democrat TDS judge illegally stripped Trump of his free speech rights in hopes that would hurt Trump's campaigning for the 2024 election.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,772
- 25,981
- 2,173
Trump was given a subpoena requiring him to turn over all documents with classified markings.
He hid them from the DoJ and lied about it.
That’s called obstruction of justice.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Unveiling The Hidden Truth About Illegal Aliens And Crime- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 1
-
It's all Y/t's fault why Swedes can't have nice things- Started by Deplorable Yankee
- Replies: 0
-
