Jane Fonda did more to save lives in Viet Nam than all the Generals combined
Too bad they weren't American lives. If there had been a formal declaration of war, Hanoi Jane would have been tried and convicted as a traitor.
I don't wish her to die, and I know it won't be possible, but if it was, I would gladly piss on her grave.
Actually, it was the Generals who should have been prosecuted
They lied about the need for a war
They lied about their prospects of winning
They lied about how the US was doing
Those Generals cost 60,000 US lives to fight a silly "Cold War" that was actually a Civil War
One would hope that in the not too distant future, sometime before you exit this veil of tears, that you- somehow- find a subject to post about wherein you actually know something about the subject.
One can only hope.
Let's begin this journey of remediation:
1. The times:
The presidential race of 1960 was significant in that both Kennedy and Nixon were Cold Warriors, and it was the last race in which the Democrat would try to outdo the Republican in anticommunist zeal! By 1972, the Democratic Party had abandoned the fight against communism altogether.
a. Kennedy suggested that Eisenhower has permitted a ‘missile gap’ between the US and the USSR.
b. Both men referred to China as “Red China.” Have you heard it used today among the ‘enlightened.’
c. “ Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.”
John F. Kennedy: Inaugural Address. U.S. Inaugural Addresses. 1989
d. There were 16,000 American troops in Vietnam when JFK was assassinated. Podhoretz, “Why We Were In Vietnam,” p. 57.
2. The lies:
a. NYTimes’ Harrison Salisbury traveled to North Vietnam in 1966-67, and reported that the US was deliberately targeting the civilian population. But Guenter Lewy, in “America in Vietnam,” revealed that “Only after the articles had appeared did a small number of persons learn that
Salisbury, in effect, had given the authority of his byline to unverified Communist propaganda and the New York Times printed it as though Salisbury had established it himself with his own on-the-scene reporting…borrowed extensively from a North Vietnamese propaganda pamphlet, “Report on US War Crimes in Nam-Dinh City…” Lewy, p. 400-401
b. There was Walter CronkiteÂ’s report of the Tet Offensive.
“To listen to Cronkite you would have assumed the Tet Offensive was a dramatic triumph by North Vietnam and a devastating defeat for the U.S. Not hardly. I did a little research into the real number of casualties each side suffered in those battles: Country/Force Killed / Wounded / Missing
US, Korea, Australia 1,536 / 7,764 / 11
South Viet Nam 2,788 / 8,299 / 587
North Viet Nam and Viet Cong 45,000 / not known / not known”
HolyCoast: Cronkite's Vietnam Editorial
3. Costing American lives.
a.It should be noted that majorities continued to believe that toughness was
preferable to unilateral withdrawal: “ domestic public opinion clearly supported
a resolute stance against communism in Vietnam, for the president's approval ratings increased during America's bombing of North Vietnam, despite increasingly vocal dissent.”
Manta - Big finds from small businesses
b. On the other side, Senator McGovern, Democrat presidential candidate in ’72, was asked by a delegate to the convention “You want us to do all they (North Vietnamese) demand and then beg them to give back our boys? McGovern replied ‘I’ll accept that. Begging is better than bombing.” David Frum, “How We Got There” The 70’s…” p. 308.
Am I correct in assuming that you favored begging, as well?