J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses

[ElmerMudd]

Judges are not allowed to make law.

They're not allowed to tell the President what to do.

Period. End of story.

Correct. That is what they are doing in the many Trump cases, interpretting law. You are an idiot if you did not know that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Who in the military?
It's f-ing amusing how liberals went from wanting to abolish the SCOTUS to now giving them unchecked power.

Who told you that silliness

 

[Hellokitty]

If the judge is truly corrupt, they’d be impeached and removed.

What you’re talking about is implementing a ruling that you don’t like. That’s how the constitution works. The president has to abide by rulings they don’t like.

Otherwise the president can do anything they want.

If a president is truly corrupt they'd be impeached and removed from office, so there's nothing to worry about.

 

[justoffal]

The Judicial is to check the power of the legislative and executive branch. The biggest constraints on ther judicial branch is to change law and the Constitution bu legislative and administrative branch.

Read your history

Wrong.... They can check nothing they can only render opinions. If their opinions become too onerous then they put themselves in a world of shit for lack of enforcement ability.

 

[Darkwind]

Far, far better than you, skippy.

Get an adult to read it to you. You can't comprehend See Cat Run.

 

[Darkwind]

Everything then goes to the Supreme Court. Whose authority cannot be changed by congress or the executive branch.

You think that is a bad thing?

The only real problem is the bottleneck.

Congress has the authority to limit the jurisdiction of every court below the Supreme Court and take away their power of a nation wide injunction.

They can be limited to JUST their districts. And that is exactly how it should be.

If the plaintiff wants to get a national injunction, they'll have to take the long road up to the SCOTUS.

 

[22lcidw]

Correct. That is what they are doing in the many Trump cases, interpretting law. You are an idiot if you did not know that.

The communist/fascist people in the "big club" have us on the precipice of...."your paperverk please". So, the time to reverse it is not as much as the tie it took us to get here. The judges are thwarting it. Even if it does not look that way.

 

[WEATHER53]

Another rogue in black robe took its shot at running the nation today by voiding permissible presidential powers and pretending to be President itself. . A total if about 1.6% of that body is doing this to 100% of its citizens
It’s absurd

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You think that is a bad thing?

The only real problem is the bottleneck.

Congress has the authority to limit the jurisdiction of every court below the Supreme Court and take away their power of a nation wide injunction.

They can be limited to JUST their districts. And that is exactly how it should be.

If the plaintiff wants to get a national injunction, they'll have to take the long road up to the SCOTUS.

Certainly doubtable, certainly debatable.

 

[ElmerMudd]

The communist/fascist people in the "big club" have us on the precipice of...."your paperverk please". So, the time to reverse it is not as much as the tie it took us to get here. The judges are thwarting it. Even if it does not look that way.

You are clueless on how our system is suppose to work and how it is working. You are a Trump lemming.

 

[ElmerMudd]

You think that is a bad thing?

The only real problem is the bottleneck.

Congress has the authority to limit the jurisdiction of every court below the Supreme Court and take away their power of a nation wide injunction.

They can be limited to JUST their districts. And that is exactly how it should be.

If the plaintiff wants to get a national injunction, they'll have to take the long road up to the SCOTUS.

You are talking in circles.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Wrong.... They can check nothing they can only render opinions. If their opinions become too onerous then they put themselves in a world of shit for lack of enforcement ability.

Who is they.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

So what can the Judicial do if their rulings are simply ignored by the Executive/Legislative?

Not a thing.
Congress can, if it wishes, use that as an article of impeachment.

High crimes and misdemeanors, ya know~

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

If a president is truly corrupt they'd be impeached and removed from office, so there's nothing to worry about.

Well, nothing for US to worry about--Trump might be wise to give it a thought or two~

 

[WEATHER53]

Speaking of crazies acting on their own:the red lump that bowled over ICE now has a 16 year sentence in play

 

[Darkwind]

You are talking in circles.

Nope. You just refuse to listen to anything but your own voice.

 

[toobfreak]

J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses​

That is a good point: Who checks the Judiciary?

• The Congress is a check on the Executive.
• The Executive is a check on Congress.
• The Judiciary is a check on the President.
• But who checks the Judiciary?

And if 670 lower courts are a check on the president and national policy, why the hell do we still need the SCOTUS for?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nope. You just refuse to listen to anything but your own voice.

The one in your head?

 

[Darkwind]

The one in your head?

You're voice is in My head?

Wow. You really can't read.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Nope. You just refuse to listen to anything but your own voice.

Mark Twain said, “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience".