J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses
- Thread starter excalibur
- Start date
I am not impressed by your attempt to seem intelligent by using big words for the sake of big words, not to get your point across. It is obvious.
Read the Constitution dumbass.
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,053
- 67,018
- 3,565
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,053
- 67,018
- 3,565
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 50,664
- 17,025
- 2,165
- Banned
- #106
Can’t wait for our next president who will be Democratic to use all the weaponization of government provided by your sycophantic fuckups.Fact!
John Roberts demand respect for inferior court judges who overstep their bounds. But only the one Supreme Court is in Article III, all inferior courts are mere creations of Congress and can be dissolved by Congress.
So, Roberts believes inferior court judges are coequal to the President, a Constitutional office? That would thus mean they are also equal to the Supreme Court.
Vice President J.D. Vance sat down for an interview with Ross Douthat. They cover much ground, but I wanted to flag this exchange concerning Chief Justice Roberts:Vance is exactly right.I think the Chief Justice largely lives in a bubble where everyone is afraid to challenge him. He sees himself as a singular force of good to save the rule of law. In Roberts's mind, he can take a shot at the incoming Vice President in his end-of-year address, and everyone will simply submit to his will. No. Vance is fighting back. Roberts thinks he can lecture the President that no judge, even members of the Supreme Court can be impeached; we the people simply have to take it. No. Vance is fighting back.And, I think, lower court judges are starting to fight back as well. Judge Ho made this same point in his concurrence yesterday, which subtly responded to Chief Justice Roberts:Yet Roberts does exactly that. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.There is a storm brewing on the horizon, and I don't think the Chief quite sees it. As I will explain in a forthcoming essay, Roberts's two decades on the bench have rendered him utterly unqualified to deal with what lies ahead. The arc from NFIB to AARP does not bode well for the future. Here is a preview:Roberts's colleagues should, sooner rather than later, cut the tether and listen to Justices Alito and Thomas. These national treasures should not retire, as they are the only ones speaking sense.
J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses
Did Roberts really think he could lob bombs at the elected branches and face nothing in return?reason.com
Read the Constitution dumbass.
Same to you.
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,053
- 67,018
- 3,565
What will he find?
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
Fact!
John Roberts demand respect for inferior court judges who overstep their bounds. But only the one Supreme Court is in Article III, all inferior courts are mere creations of Congress and can be dissolved by Congress.
So, Roberts believes inferior court judges are coequal to the President, a Constitutional office? That would thus mean they are also equal to the Supreme Court.
Vice President J.D. Vance sat down for an interview with Ross Douthat. They cover much ground, but I wanted to flag this exchange concerning Chief Justice Roberts:Vance is exactly right.I think the Chief Justice largely lives in a bubble where everyone is afraid to challenge him. He sees himself as a singular force of good to save the rule of law. In Roberts's mind, he can take a shot at the incoming Vice President in his end-of-year address, and everyone will simply submit to his will. No. Vance is fighting back. Roberts thinks he can lecture the President that no judge, even members of the Supreme Court can be impeached; we the people simply have to take it. No. Vance is fighting back.And, I think, lower court judges are starting to fight back as well. Judge Ho made this same point in his concurrence yesterday, which subtly responded to Chief Justice Roberts:Yet Roberts does exactly that. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.There is a storm brewing on the horizon, and I don't think the Chief quite sees it. As I will explain in a forthcoming essay, Roberts's two decades on the bench have rendered him utterly unqualified to deal with what lies ahead. The arc from NFIB to AARP does not bode well for the future. Here is a preview:Roberts's colleagues should, sooner rather than later, cut the tether and listen to Justices Alito and Thomas. These national treasures should not retire, as they are the only ones speaking sense.
J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses
Did Roberts really think he could lob bombs at the elected branches and face nothing in return?
Vance doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. I guess they didn't have a Constitution Law class at Harvard when he got his law degree.
What's an "inferior court judge". All federal judges were investigated by the FBI, vetted by the Senate, and confirmed by the Senate.
Similar threads
