J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses

[Moonglow]

You will have to document what you are talking about before I respond

No memory, eh.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Well clearly you state you have no idea what is meant!!!

I am not impressed by your attempt to seem intelligent by using big words for the sake of big words, not to get your point across. It is obvious.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Where does the Constitution mandate respect for demigods in black robes?

Read the Constitution dumbass.

 

[Mac-7]

No memory, eh.

I dont speak Libberish

Try telling us in English what you meant

 

[Mac-7]

Read the Constitution dumbass.

Thats not an answer

If you dont know just be honest and say so

 

[otto105]

Fact!

John Roberts demand respect for inferior court judges who overstep their bounds. But only the one Supreme Court is in Article III, all inferior courts are mere creations of Congress and can be dissolved by Congress.

So, Roberts believes inferior court judges are coequal to the President, a Constitutional office? That would thus mean they are also equal to the Supreme Court.

​

​

Vice President J.D. Vance sat down for an interview with Ross Douthat. They cover much ground, but I wanted to flag this exchange concerning Chief Justice Roberts:​

​

​

​

​

Vance is exactly right.​

​

​

I think the Chief Justice largely lives in a bubble where everyone is afraid to challenge him. He sees himself as a singular force of good to save the rule of law. In Roberts's mind, he can take a shot at the incoming Vice President in his end-of-year address, and everyone will simply submit to his will. No. Vance is fighting back. Roberts thinks he can lecture the President that no judge, even members of the Supreme Court can be impeached; we the people simply have to take it. No. Vance is fighting back.​

​

​

And, I think, lower court judges are starting to fight back as well. Judge Ho made this same point in his concurrence yesterday, which subtly responded to Chief Justice Roberts:​

​

​

​

​

Yet Roberts does exactly that. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.​

​

​

There is a storm brewing on the horizon, and I don't think the Chief quite sees it. As I will explain in a forthcoming essay, Roberts's two decades on the bench have rendered him utterly unqualified to deal with what lies ahead. The arc from NFIB to AARP does not bode well for the future. Here is a preview:​

​

​

​

​

Roberts's colleagues should, sooner rather than later, cut the tether and listen to Justices Alito and Thomas. These national treasures should not retire, as they are the only ones speaking sense.​

J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses

Did Roberts really think he could lob bombs at the elected branches and face nothing in return?

reason.com

Can’t wait for our next president who will be Democratic to use all the weaponization of government provided by your sycophantic fuckups.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Thats not an answer

If you dont know just be honest and say so

Read the Constitution dumbass.

 

[Robert W]

I am not impressed by your attempt to seem intelligent by using big words for the sake of big words, not to get your point across. It is obvious.

Same to you.

 

[Mac-7]

Read the Constitution dumbass.

Its a big documemt

Dont you know anything it might say to explain your claim?

 

[Robert W]

Read the Constitution dumbass.

What will he find?

 

[Dragonlady]

Fact!

John Roberts demand respect for inferior court judges who overstep their bounds. But only the one Supreme Court is in Article III, all inferior courts are mere creations of Congress and can be dissolved by Congress.

So, Roberts believes inferior court judges are coequal to the President, a Constitutional office? That would thus mean they are also equal to the Supreme Court.

​

​

Vice President J.D. Vance sat down for an interview with Ross Douthat. They cover much ground, but I wanted to flag this exchange concerning Chief Justice Roberts:​

​

​

​

​

Vance is exactly right.​

​

​

I think the Chief Justice largely lives in a bubble where everyone is afraid to challenge him. He sees himself as a singular force of good to save the rule of law. In Roberts's mind, he can take a shot at the incoming Vice President in his end-of-year address, and everyone will simply submit to his will. No. Vance is fighting back. Roberts thinks he can lecture the President that no judge, even members of the Supreme Court can be impeached; we the people simply have to take it. No. Vance is fighting back.​

​

​

And, I think, lower court judges are starting to fight back as well. Judge Ho made this same point in his concurrence yesterday, which subtly responded to Chief Justice Roberts:​

​

​

​

​

Yet Roberts does exactly that. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.​

​

​

There is a storm brewing on the horizon, and I don't think the Chief quite sees it. As I will explain in a forthcoming essay, Roberts's two decades on the bench have rendered him utterly unqualified to deal with what lies ahead. The arc from NFIB to AARP does not bode well for the future. Here is a preview:​

​

​

​

​

Roberts's colleagues should, sooner rather than later, cut the tether and listen to Justices Alito and Thomas. These national treasures should not retire, as they are the only ones speaking sense.​

J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses

Did Roberts really think he could lob bombs at the elected branches and face nothing in return?

reason.com

Vance doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. I guess they didn't have a Constitution Law class at Harvard when he got his law degree.

What's an "inferior court judge". All federal judges were investigated by the FBI, vetted by the Senate, and confirmed by the Senate.