J.D. Vance to Chief Justice Roberts: The Judiciary Must Check Its Own Excesses

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Backatcha

Work on critical thinking.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Their argument comes down to this: The courts rule all, that is their argument, and that isn't anywhere in the Constitution.

Co-equal branches, excalibur. The judiciary adjudicates what they law says, not the executive.

 

[ElmerMudd]

So what can the Judicial do if their rulings are simply ignored by the Executive/Legislative?

We ae soon to find out.
We beak the seperation of powers we break our nation as set up by our founding fathers. We will be heading to what they feared, tyranny.

 

[excalibur]

... where each branch had the power to limit the actions of the other two, ensuring a balance of authority and preventing tyranny.

How does the Executive (the President) limit the power of the courts?

 

[ElmerMudd]

Their argument comes down to this: The courts rule all, that is their argument, and that isn't anywhere in the Constitution.

You dumbass. It does nothing of the kind.
The Founding Fathers planned for separation of powers in the US government to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. They divided governmental authority into three distinct branches: legislative (Congress), executive (President), and judicial (Supreme Court), each with specific, non-overlapping responsibilities. This division was coupled with a system of checks and balances, where each branch had the power to limit the actions of the other two, ensuring a balance of authority and preventing tyranny.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

How does the Executive (the President) limit the power of the courts?

By refusing to follow their orders.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Show me where it says that in Article III.

And inferior courts, created by Congress and which can be dissolved by Congress, are not coequal. They sure aren't coequal to Article III which names the one Supreme Court, so they cannot be coequal with Article I or Article II either, only SCOTUS can lay claim to that.

What are you talking about
Article III of the U.S. Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government, specifically the Supreme Court and any inferior courts that Congress may create. It defines the judicial power, including the Supreme Court's original and appellate jurisdiction. The article also outlines the definition of treason, the conditions for conviction, and the power of Congress to declare punishments for treason.

 

[excalibur]

You dumbass. It does nothing of the kind.
The Founding Fathers planned for separation of powers in the US government to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. They divided governmental authority into three distinct branches: legislative (Congress), executive (President), and judicial (Supreme Court), each with specific, non-overlapping responsibilities. This division was coupled with a system of checks and balances, where each branch had the power to limit the actions of the other two, ensuring a balance of authority and preventing tyranny.

They said the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches.

I won't sink to using an ad hominem as you are fond of doing, showing your incivility.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They said the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches.

I won't sink to using an ad hominem as you are fond of doing, showing your incivility.

Alexander Hamilton said that, in that it operated on moral authority.

All three are co-equal in their sphere.

You are one of the more unethical posters here because of your twisting of narratives and facts to arrive at otherwise unsupportable conclusions.

 

[ElmerMudd]

They said the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches.

I won't sink to using an ad hominem as you are fond of doing, showing your incivility.

Wow, you are using some big fancy words that most MAGA lemming have no idea what they mean.

 

[ElmerMudd]

They said the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches.

I won't sink to using an ad hominem as you are fond of doing, showing your incivility.

You and MAGA want to weaken judicial but the founding fathers did not see it that way
The three branches of the U.S. government (legislative, executive, and judicial) are intended to be equal. The Constitution establishes them as separate but equal, with each having distinct powers and responsibilities. This separation of powers, combined with a system of checks and balances, ensures that no single branch becomes too powerful. Each branch has the ability to limit the power of the others, maintaining a balanced government

 

[Care4all]

How does the Executive (the President) limit the power of the courts?

The executive appoints the federal judges and justices.

 

[scruffy]

The Judicial is to check the power of the legislative and executive branch. The biggest constraints on ther judicial branch is to change law and the Constitution bu legislative and administrative branch.

Read your history

Judges are not allowed to make law.

They're not allowed to tell the President what to do.

Period. End of story.