J.D. Vance meets the Nazi apologists.

You can be free to make your decisions on what it makes those who apologizes for the Nazi's but first Musk and now Vance give them legitimacy by meeting with them.

Insult nearly the entire world but then side up with the far right Nazi apologists. It was said that Trump was fascinated with Mein Kampf and well, the administration is doing nothing but enforce that idea.

MUNICH, Feb 14 (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President JD Vance met on Friday in Munich with the leader of Germany's far-right AfD, his office confirmed, after endorsing the party as a political partner — a stance Berlin dismissed as unwelcome election interference.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...uld-not-interfere-german-politics-2025-02-14/
How did all that NAZI NAZI NAZI bullsqueeze work out for ya in November, Simp? :auiqs.jpg:
 
Not sure if anyone's pointed this out to you but those were the same Nazi's. The fact that they did some objective good doesn't make up for the fact that they killed millions of people. Im sure Stalin and Mao, did some good you could point to as well.
I know of no person who claims the Nazis were excellent for creating wars. My claim is prior to wars, FDR admired them. So why? I explained why. It was jobs.
 
The logic is that the Republican party has been welcoming Nazi sympathizers into their party for the last three decades.
The logic is that Vance and Musk (who hasn't been elected to any post) are meeting with Nazi sympathizers.
The logic is that Trump and his hand picked cronies are running the same playbook the Nazis ran in their rise to power.

So..yeah..really. :)
How did that NAZI NAZI NAZI bullsqueeze work out for you in November, clown? :auiqs.jpg:
 
How did that NAZI NAZI NAZI bullsqueeze work out for you in November, clown?
When you cry like you do, it tells us that what we're doing makes you extra-butthurt, and so we should keep doing it.

For you own safety, you need to hide your Nazi loser tears. After all, most decent people still reflexively want to punch Nazis.

So, can you tell us even one policy you hold that differs from that of the Nazis?

Didn't think so.
 
When you cry like you do, it tells us that what we're doing makes you extra-butthurt, and so we should keep doing it.

For you own safety, you need to hide your Nazi loser tears. After all, most decent people still reflexively want to punch Nazis.

So, can you tell us even one policy you hold that differs from that of the Nazis?

Didn't think so.
YES!@!!!! Hitler waged wars. Hitler caused millions to be murdered. Terrible act by him.

Before that he enacted the German new deal. FDR marveled at it and created the American new deal.
 
No, stupid, the were far right.

View attachment 1079700
It would be more accurate to say that National Socialists (Nazis) were economically left and socially right. They were the "Third Way" of their era. National Socialism was a direct response to communism, fascism, and capitalism. Hitler viewed the communists as too far left and the fascists and capitalists as too far right.

The "private property" rights of the Nazi regime were largely superficial, since the government had the ability to seize private property at any time for any reason. They also controlled production to a large extent. In short, if you tried to go against whatever directives the government made regarding production or spoke out against the government, your property was forfeited to the government.

So, in practical terms, they didn't really have property rights in any meaningful sense. Collectivist policies on property are very much an economic left thing, not an economic right thing.
 
It would be more accurate to say that National Socialists (Nazis) were economically left and socially right. They were the "Third Way" of their era. National Socialism was a direct response to communism, fascism, and capitalism. Hitler viewed the communists as too far left and the fascists and capitalists as too far right.

The "private property" rights of the Nazi regime were largely superficial, since the government had the ability to seize private property at any time for any reason. They also controlled production to a large extent. In short, if you tried to go against whatever directives the government made regarding production or spoke out against the government, your property was forfeited to the government.

So, in practical terms, they didn't really have property rights in any meaningful sense. Collectivist policies on property are very much an economic left thing, not an economic right thing.
your discussion of "nazi" is the best I have seen ----it should be posted up next to the picture of
George Washington crossing the Delaware River in every classroom in the USA
 
It would be more accurate to say that National Socialists (Nazis) were economically left and socially right. They were the "Third Way" of their era. National Socialism was a direct response to communism, fascism, and capitalism. Hitler viewed the communists as too far left and the fascists and capitalists as too far right.

The "private property" rights of the Nazi regime were largely superficial, since the government had the ability to seize private property at any time for any reason. They also controlled production to a large extent. In short, if you tried to go against whatever directives the government made regarding production or spoke out against the government, your property was forfeited to the government.

So, in practical terms, they didn't really have property rights in any meaningful sense. Collectivist policies on property are very much an economic left thing, not an economic right thing.
Believe whatever you wish, the Nazis were fascists who terrorized their own people and much of the Western world.
 
Believe whatever you wish, the Nazis were fascists who terrorized their own people and much of the Western world.
The fascist label on Nazis is somewhat of a misnomer. While National Socialism shares a lot in common with fascism, it is not identical by any stretch. Mussolini was a fascist, as were Franco and Salazar. So, Hitler was obviously willing to ally with fascists (like Mussolini), but it is worthwhile in making a distinction between them. For example, Mussolini was actually quite congenial with Jews before he allied with Hitler. Fascism tends to have a much more nationalistic orientation than a racial one, unlike National Socialism.

Understanding the difference between fascism and National Socialism also aids in realizing where Nazism actually fits in the political axes. Fascism is authoritarian right, while National Socialism is more authoritarian center. Communism is, of course, authoritarian left.

I don't think anyone is going to deny that Nazism was a threat to the world, but so was communism.
 
Believe whatever you wish, the Nazis were fascists who terrorized their own people and much of the Western world.

“Leftism is the tyranny of structurlessness. Lawlessness. The abhorrence of order. That is why Leftist individuals are characterized by emotional dysregulation. . . . " JT Haltigan
 
So, in practical terms, they didn't really have property rights in any meaningful sense.
German monopolies increased their wealth fivefold during the war. And this in a country that had LOST the war.....
Hitler always, until his last days, remembered who brought him to power, who gave him the money for this. Where is the leftism in that, I don't know.
 
15th post
German monopolies increased their wealth fivefold during the war. And this in a country that had LOST the war.....
Hitler always, until his last days, remembered who brought him to power, who gave him the money for this. Where is the leftism in that, I don't know.
If that's your argument, then the Soviet Union and Maoist China weren't leftist either by equivalent criteria. It would then beg the question of what you actually consider leftist.

Nevertheless, I would define National Socialism as authoritarian center, using the traditional political axes.
 
German monopolies increased their wealth fivefold during the war. And this in a country that had LOST the war.....
Hitler always, until his last days, remembered who brought him to power, who gave him the money for this. Where is the leftism in that, I don't know.

German monopolies increased their wealth fivefold during the war.

Only if you consider bombed out rubble to be wealth.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom