Ivermectin

Over the last year, those studies of ivermectin have been accumulating — and a pattern has emerged. Careful, large, well-conducted studies tend to find modest benefits or no statistically significant benefits for Covid-19 patients who took ivermectin. “The confidence intervals span both modest benefit and modest harm,” says Meyerowitz-Katz. In other words, the results that the studies have found are small enough that they’d be plausible if the drug works — and also plausible if it actively has negative effects.​
Mills’s own study, presented at an NIH roundtable in August and still awaiting publication, found “no important clinical benefit,” he told me. The results were sufficiently unpromising that the study would have been terminated sooner if not for the furor around the drug. “The data safety person said, ‘This is now futile and you’re offering no benefit to patients involved in the trial,’” Mills told the New York Times.​

You’ve been proven a fool. Stop posting.
 
Ed mills has another problem with credibility: ivermectin was first used on a nematode of mice, Heligmosomoides, which also infects the Camas Pocket gopher. The gopher also interacts with the long-tailed weasel, a mustelid. Ivermectin physically attaches to the SARS-CoV-2 spike at position 91, which is a leucine. It is also a leucine at that position for Mink Coronavirus 1, strain A0A7D4XU53 (A0A7D4XU53_9ALPC). Thus, ivermectin would probably work in Danish minks were they not culled. Not far from Mojiang, minks are likely sold at the nasty Kunming Flower and Animal Market. Where is the link to the ivermectin-treated minks?
 
Mink are infected with canine distemper. CDV also infects the proven reservoir of SARS-CoV, palm civet.

Jul 2001 Memphis: Mink / Ivermectin / Macracanthorynchus

Canine Distemper / Everglades Mink

Aug 2007 Florida Mink / Macracanthorynchus
 
Everglades Mink CDV
 
Over the last year, those studies of ivermectin have been accumulating — and a pattern has emerged. Careful, large, well-conducted studies tend to find modest benefits or no statistically significant benefits for Covid-19 patients who took ivermectin. “The confidence intervals span both modest benefit and modest harm,” says Meyerowitz-Katz. In other words, the results that the studies have found are small enough that they’d be plausible if the drug works — and also plausible if it actively has negative effects.​
Mills’s own study, presented at an NIH roundtable in August and still awaiting publication, found “no important clinical benefit,” he told me. The results were sufficiently unpromising that the study would have been terminated sooner if not for the furor around the drug. “The data safety person said, ‘This is now futile and you’re offering no benefit to patients involved in the trial,’” Mills told the New York Times.​


Thank you for posting this. I have mentioned the Together Trial in a previous post as well. This study mirrors what was found in a 500 person trial before it.
 
This woman was in a coma.

Her family had to go to court where a judge ordered her to be given ivermectin.

She's now at home recovering.

Though the bigger issue is why the courts are involved with people's personal medical decisions.

 
This woman was in a coma.

Her family had to go to court where a judge ordered her to be given ivermectin.

She's now at home recovering.

Though the bigger issue is why the courts are involved with people's personal medical decisions.


Because the Chinese communists are not coughing up what they know about their virus.
 
Thank you for posting this. I have mentioned the Together Trial in a previous post as well. This study mirrors what was found in a 500 person trial before it.
The Together Trial, sponsored by Fau Chi’s NIH, used Brazilians. The CDC (Chinese-controlled WHO is the CDC’s handlers) changed categories, and we think that is why the CDC changed their webpage on the Brazilian-Japanese P.1 variant mutation at position 417 of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
 
The prisoner-reader gets cut off by a paywall, a sign of Chinese-controlled Nazi Dem media:

16 Aug 20231 McMaster Together Trial
 
So, where is the link to an ivermectin trial that gives up information about dosing, timing, etc.?
 
Article, Tweets & videos continued:
Pfizermectin? Is Pfizer Rebranding Ivermectin to Use to treat Covid-19?

big pharma just made fools out of the OP.
Merck has developed a pill, molnupiravir, which is a jazzed-up version of remdesivir. Why all the negative Nazi-dem media about ivermectin, when it is a scientific fact that ivermectin physically attaches to SARS-CoV-2? Is Pfizer beikng lucid? It is a fact that Selamectin (Pfizer, Ltd.)has been used to treat a proven SARS-CoV reservoir for scabies. What does Pfizer’s ass have to say about the virus being inside that animal?
 
I can't wait til Big Pharma comes out with an early treatment that is basically ivermectin with a different more $$$ brand name and you liberals will be crying to get your hands on it
Why would you think that is ever going to happen? Oh that's right... you believe fantasies without a shred of evidence...
 

Forum List

Back
Top