Ivermectin

[Rigby5]

Yeah.

Hospitals overwhelmed by ivermectin victims? How a viral story fell apart

On Sept. 6, local Oklahoma news outlet KFOR-TV reported that so many people in the state were overdosing on the anti-parasite drug ivermectin that emergency rooms and ambulance services were backed up. According to the report, Dr. Jason McElyea said "patients are packing his eastern and...

www.rawstory.com

Exactly.
The fact people would deliberately make up false stories about Ivermectin problems, shows there is a strange incentive to maximize this epidemic.
The facts are clear about many drugs like Ivermectin, not just Ivermectin, totally ending the problems, and yet false media propaganda is preventing them from being universally accepted.
Why?

 

[badger2]

Ivermectin (Oral Route) Proper Use - Mayo Clinic

www.mayoclinic.org

"Ivermectin is best taken as a single dose with a full glass (8 ounces) of water on an empty stomach (1 hour before breakfast), unless otherwise directed by your doctor."

Arguing with the Mayo Clinic?

Lots of luck with that.

Mayo has a problem: ivermectin physically docks to SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. It will still have a problem if and when it tries to talk down this same phenomenon happening in vivo.

Sep 2020 Icahn Medical School, Mt. Sinai, New York

Ivermectin Docks to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-binding Domain Attached to ACE2 - PubMed

The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Rigby5]

Mayo has a problem: ivermectin physically docks to SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. It will still have a problem if and when it tries to talk down this same phenomenon happening in vivo.

Sep 2020 Icahn Medical School, Mt. Sinai, New York

Ivermectin Docks to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-binding Domain Attached to ACE2 - PubMed

The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

{...
Thus, the key difference between in vitro and in vivo is that in vitro means outside the cell in an artificial environment which is a reconstruction of the biological model whereas in vivo means within the cell under native conditions.
...}

Here is what the Mayo study said:
{...

Abstract​

Background/aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2.
Materials and methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study.
Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08.
Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.
...}

So we need clinical trials to be able to tell?

 

[SweetSue92]

Join the herd, and talk to your large animal veternarian today, to see if Ivermectin is right for you.




Take only as directed.

I can't wait til Big Pharma comes out with an early treatment that is basically ivermectin with a different more $$$ brand name and you liberals will be crying to get your hands on it

Suckers

 

[badger2]

{...
Thus, the key difference between in vitro and in vivo is that in vitro means outside the cell in an artificial environment which is a reconstruction of the biological model whereas in vivo means within the cell under native conditions.
...}

Here is what the Mayo study said:
{...

Abstract​

Background/aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2.
Materials and methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study.
Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08.
Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.
...}

So we need clinical trials to be able to tell?

Homo sapiens is so stupid that they have been helpless to set up a study whereby ivermectin flows through the ventilator attached to the mouse. Duh

 

[badger2]

But the leucine 91 location tells us more about the commie virus, thus sooner or later decreasing the costs of monoclonals. This is so due to other facts: Nipah virus vector bats eat the same fruit that contains compounds that attach to SARS-CoV-2 spikes. These spike locations (have also been documented [italics]). The next thing the unlazy should do is to check the genome of yak coronavirus spikes to see if there are any correlations, because girls ride yaks north of Mojiang mine, and some scientists in Belarus think that yaks are the intermediate SARS-CoV-2 host.

 

[gipper]

Join the herd, and talk to your large animal veternarian today, to see if Ivermectin is right for you.




Take only as directed.

Dumb. Ivermectin is approved for use in humans by WHO and FDA. Merck has donated it to African nations to cure many diseases in humans. It’s extremely safe and effective and has been so for decades.

Get informed. Stop being ignorant!!!

 

[gipper]

Dumb. Ivermectin is approved for use in humans by WHO and FDA. Merck has donated it to African nations to cure many diseases in humans. It’s extremely safe and effective and has been so for decades.

Get informed. Stop being ignorant!!!

NIH too!!!!

 

[krichton]

Ivermectin, the choice of medicine for those already suffering from delusions.

 

[Rigby5]

Ivermectin, the choice of medicine for those already suffering from delusions.

That is silly.
The covid virus does almost no harm, and it is only the over reaction by the immune system that kills people and causes harm.
So there are dozens of immuno-suppressants we can and should be using, so that no one dies.

 

[gipper]

Ivermectin, the choice of medicine for those already suffering from delusions.

See? There it is. Ignorance in full bloom.

 

[gipper]

That is silly.
The covid virus does almost no harm, and it is only the over reaction by the immune system that kills people and causes harm.
So there are dozens of immuno-suppressants we can and should be using, so that no one dies.

Ivermectin is very safe. Used very effectively in many places including Africa where covid hasn’t done much harm.

This horse wormer bs was made up to protect big pharma. Sad. Very sad that people fall for these obvious lies by the establishment.

 

[Toro]

Over the last year, those studies of ivermectin have been accumulating — and a pattern has emerged. Careful, large, well-conducted studies tend to find modest benefits or no statistically significant benefits for Covid-19 patients who took ivermectin. “The confidence intervals span both modest benefit and modest harm,” says Meyerowitz-Katz. In other words, the results that the studies have found are small enough that they’d be plausible if the drug works — and also plausible if it actively has negative effects.​

​

Mills’s own study, presented at an NIH roundtable in August and still awaiting publication, found “no important clinical benefit,” he told me. The results were sufficiently unpromising that the study would have been terminated sooner if not for the furor around the drug. “The data safety person said, ‘This is now futile and you’re offering no benefit to patients involved in the trial,’” Mills told the New York Times.​

The dubious rise of ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment, explained

Evidence suggests ivermectin is not a Covid-19 "miracle drug." How did it get so popular?

www.vox.com

 

[badger2]

Over the last year, those studies of ivermectin have been accumulating — and a pattern has emerged. Careful, large, well-conducted studies tend to find modest benefits or no statistically significant benefits for Covid-19 patients who took ivermectin. “The confidence intervals span both modest benefit and modest harm,” says Meyerowitz-Katz. In other words, the results that the studies have found are small enough that they’d be plausible if the drug works — and also plausible if it actively has negative effects.​

​

Mills’s own study, presented at an NIH roundtable in August and still awaiting publication, found “no important clinical benefit,” he told me. The results were sufficiently unpromising that the study would have been terminated sooner if not for the furor around the drug. “The data safety person said, ‘This is now futile and you’re offering no benefit to patients involved in the trial,’” Mills told the New York Times.​

The dubious rise of ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment, explained

Evidence suggests ivermectin is not a Covid-19 "miracle drug." How did it get so popular?

www.vox.com

You must still accept the scientific fact that ivermectin physically attaches to the (dipshit) communist virus, SARS-Cov-2. You will not be weaseling out of that, because there is still more discourse to do about delivery, synergy, and spike attachment locations. What Homo sapiens is arrogant enough to disregard the idea that this dipshit pretends not to notice this attachment to itself, (in vivo [italics])?

 

[MaryL]

Join the herd, and talk to your large animal veternarian today, to see if Ivermectin is right for you.




Take only as directed.

This vid was funny up till the "white supremacy" thing. Charming. Jarring little note that takes you out of the moment into a head on collision with fucking propaganda. (BTW: The FDA uses ANIMALS to test drugs for HUMAN consumption. Many drugs have cross species uses...so hardy fucking harr.)

 

[badger2]

This vid was funny up till the "white supremacy" thing. Charming. Jarring little note that takes you out of the moment into a head on collision with fucking propaganda. (BTW: The FDA uses ANIMALS to test drugs for HUMAN consumption. Many drugs have cross species uses...so hardy fucking harr.)

The video is a POS, and ahistorical as hell. Ivermectin was first used on a parasite of mice, which links to the Willamette Valley, Oregon.

 

[krichton]

You could always prove me wrong. I didn't change shit. Hundreds of thousands across the country cured and one doctor in FLA with 3 clinics, 50,000. It's in the news.

Dummy, you're the one making the claim. Its your job to prove your own wacky statements, if you want to be taken seriously.

 

[badger2]

While compiling a list of military connections to Wuhan lab, it would be beneficial to have an ivermectin links list as well.

 

[badger2]

Over the last year, those studies of ivermectin have been accumulating — and a pattern has emerged. Careful, large, well-conducted studies tend to find modest benefits or no statistically significant benefits for Covid-19 patients who took ivermectin. “The confidence intervals span both modest benefit and modest harm,” says Meyerowitz-Katz. In other words, the results that the studies have found are small enough that they’d be plausible if the drug works — and also plausible if it actively has negative effects.​

​

Mills’s own study, presented at an NIH roundtable in August and still awaiting publication, found “no important clinical benefit,” he told me. The results were sufficiently unpromising that the study would have been terminated sooner if not for the furor around the drug. “The data safety person said, ‘This is now futile and you’re offering no benefit to patients involved in the trial,’” Mills told the New York Times.​

The dubious rise of ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment, explained

Evidence suggests ivermectin is not a Covid-19 "miracle drug." How did it get so popular?

www.vox.com

Ed Mills, when he completes writing on his huge ivermectin study will be confronted with another study: ivermectin attaching to SARS-CoV-2 in vivo.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Join the herd, and talk to your large animal veternarian today, to see if Ivermectin is right for you.




Take only as directed.

Have you tried Google? See what even your Godvernment says about it.

If I'm terminal, I wouldn't hesitate to take it (cancer treatment)