It's Not a Glitch - It's a Feature

[colfax_m]

Shut the fuck up. You haven't seen shit. You don't know what the fuck you were at or talk about anything. You're just a fucking janitor aren't you.

They’re court proceedings, which means they’re public. Thing is, it takes some effort and an attention span longer than a few minutes to read, so that rules out what a lot of you idiots are willing to do.

Poor Coleytroll - you sound really upset this morning
No one believes your lies - sad.

What are you going to do when this shit all falls apart when it reaches court? (If it ever reaches court)

 

[Gdjjr]

I know someone, who, told me, Qanon predicted this 17 months ago- and that Trump was, at that time, preparing for it-

These shananigans don't bode well for the Republic- although, Lincoln would be proud to help save the Union.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Biden won by 6 million votes, but the Dems lost up to 13 house seats.

That's what happens when the software was set to only change Presidential votes.

It's so fucking obvious.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Shut the fuck up. You haven't seen shit. You don't know what the fuck you were at or talk about anything. You're just a fucking janitor aren't you.

They’re court proceedings, which means they’re public. Thing is, it takes some effort and an attention span longer than a few minutes to read, so that rules out what a lot of you idiots are willing to do.

Poor Coleytroll - you sound really upset this morning
No one believes your lies - sad.

What are you going to do when this shit all falls apart when it reaches court? (If it ever reaches court)

Well if this shit right here is in fact how the vote tallies came down (pretty sure they did) an expert for the President can easily explain this phenom being something like a one in a quadrillion probability. It becomes almost CONCLUSIVE at that point. I would love to see the counter-expert hired by Dems to rebut this:

Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total. Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away. The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts. Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th. This resulted in over half a million more votes net going to Biden and 73% of the votes during this timeframe.

What’s really odd about these entries are the huge negative entries. One entry taking away 330,153.54 votes from Biden and 37,510.39 from Trump appears to have reversed an entry a few minutes that at around midnight. Then at 12:26 and 12:30am an entry in the amount of 308,341.59 from Biden and 80,357.05 from Trump was posted and reversed. The exact same amounts. A few hours later another 230,000 votes net were added to Biden’s lead.



Then, after the big dump, all subsequent dumps follow THE EXACT SAME RATIO, of 54% Biden, 45% Trump:

We also identified the exact same activity in Pennsylvania. On election night, Trump is up by 500,000 votes and leading 56%-42% with about 43% of the vote count in. Then Trump starts to get votes deducted increasing in frequency seemingly to keep the margin moving in Biden’s direction little by little. Finally, a couple days later Biden flips to the lead with 90% of the vote counted and the margin is locked in for almost all subsequent incremental counts at a 50.051 to 49.949 ratio for Biden (See portion of entries below).

 

[Billiejeens]

Shut the fuck up. You haven't seen shit. You don't know what the fuck you were at or talk about anything. You're just a fucking janitor aren't you.

They’re court proceedings, which means they’re public. Thing is, it takes some effort and an attention span longer than a few minutes to read, so that rules out what a lot of you idiots are willing to do.

the problem is that, based on your statements about the Flynn case, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO READ THEM!!!

It’s not very ambiguous when the judge denies Powell’s motions in their entirety.

Corrupt Judge Denies Motions
She still wins

You have just described spectacular - thank you.

 

[mamooth]

Its so fucking obvious.

Yet you can't show any evidence of any sort for it.

That's because you're just making it all up, driven by sore-loser butthurt and a hatred of American democracy.

What, you actually thought that wasn't obvious?

 

[colfax_m]

Shut the fuck up. You haven't seen shit. You don't know what the fuck you were at or talk about anything. You're just a fucking janitor aren't you.

They’re court proceedings, which means they’re public. Thing is, it takes some effort and an attention span longer than a few minutes to read, so that rules out what a lot of you idiots are willing to do.

Poor Coleytroll - you sound really upset this morning
No one believes your lies - sad.

What are you going to do when this shit all falls apart when it reaches court? (If it ever reaches court)

Well if this shit right here is in fact how the vote tallies came down (pretty sure they did) an expert for the President can easily explain this phenom being something like a one in a quadrillion probability. It becomes almost CONCLUSIVE at that point. I would love to see the counter-expert hired by Dems to rebut this:

Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total. Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away. The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts. Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th. This resulted in over half a million more votes net going to Biden and 73% of the votes during this timeframe.

What’s really odd about these entries are the huge negative entries. One entry taking away 330,153.54 votes from Biden and 37,510.39 from Trump appears to have reversed an entry a few minutes that at around midnight. Then at 12:26 and 12:30am an entry in the amount of 308,341.59 from Biden and 80,357.05 from Trump was posted and reversed. The exact same amounts. A few hours later another 230,000 votes net were added to Biden’s lead.



Then, after the big dump, all subsequent dumps follow THE EXACT SAME RATIO, of 54% Biden, 45% Trump:

We also identified the exact same activity in Pennsylvania. On election night, Trump is up by 500,000 votes and leading 56%-42% with about 43% of the vote count in. Then Trump starts to get votes deducted increasing in frequency seemingly to keep the margin moving in Biden’s direction little by little. Finally, a couple days later Biden flips to the lead with 90% of the vote counted and the margin is locked in for almost all subsequent incremental counts at a 50.051 to 49.949 ratio for Biden (See portion of entries below).

They won’t even tell you where this data come from. Let’s start at step one.

 

[Billiejeens]

Such Ignorance

What happened yesterday after I proved you are an ignorant asshole and you ran away rather than admit it?

Good grief Coleytroll -
That didn't happen.

 

[colfax_m]

Shut the fuck up. You haven't seen shit. You don't know what the fuck you were at or talk about anything. You're just a fucking janitor aren't you.

They’re court proceedings, which means they’re public. Thing is, it takes some effort and an attention span longer than a few minutes to read, so that rules out what a lot of you idiots are willing to do.

the problem is that, based on your statements about the Flynn case, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO READ THEM!!!

It’s not very ambiguous when the judge denies Powell’s motions in their entirety.

Corrupt Judge Denies Motions
She still wins

You have just described spectacular - thank you/

What did she win?

 

[Billiejeens]

Its so fucking obvious.

Yet you can't show any evidence of any sort for it.

That's because you're just making it all up, driven by sore-loser butthurt and a hatred of American democracy.

What, you actually thought that wasn't obvious?

The instructions for fraud are in the actual manual for the actual software.
The Dems are used to Republicans just giving up
They don't understand the President or the people who support him.

 

[colfax_m]

Such Ignorance

What happened yesterday after I proved you are an ignorant asshole and you ran away rather than admit it?

Good grief Coleytroll -
That didn't happen.

It did. I showed you the data that proved you wrong about Bush v Gore and you ran away like a pussy.

Now you’re showing you’re too big of a pussy to admit it.

 

[Billiejeens]

Shut the fuck up. You haven't seen shit. You don't know what the fuck you were at or talk about anything. You're just a fucking janitor aren't you.

They’re court proceedings, which means they’re public. Thing is, it takes some effort and an attention span longer than a few minutes to read, so that rules out what a lot of you idiots are willing to do.

the problem is that, based on your statements about the Flynn case, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO READ THEM!!!

It’s not very ambiguous when the judge denies Powell’s motions in their entirety.

Corrupt Judge Denies Motions
She still wins

You have just described spectacular - thank you/

What did she win?

The case.

 

[Billiejeens]

Such Ignorance

What happened yesterday after I proved you are an ignorant asshole and you ran away rather than admit it?

Good grief Coleytroll -
That didn't happen.

It did. I showed you the data that proved you wrong about Bush v Gore and you ran away like a pussy.

Now you’re showing you’re too big of a pussy to admit it.

It showed that if ballots that did not meet legal standards were counted, Gore won.
I acknowledged that from the start - and never waivered.

 

[mamooth]

The instructions for fraud are in the actual manual for the actual software.

A few tiny problems there.

A. You haven't shown the manual

B. You haven't shown how it has instructions for fraud.

C. Even if it did, it would only be evidence for the possiblity of fraud, possibly by Republicans. As the Republicans are the ones with the long proud history of vote fraud, a sensible person would initially assume that Republicans are using the system to commit fraud.

D. You made claims about fraud in Georgia, and the hand recount shows those claims were baseless. And Georgia is a Republican-run state. Why would Republicans cheat for Biden?

 

[colfax_m]

The case.

The case is still pending dumb ass.

 

[colfax_m]

It showed that if ballots that did not meet legal standards were counted, Gore won.

You made that up.

 

[Billiejeens]

The case.

The case is still pending dumb ass.

It's not

 

[Billiejeens]

It showed that if ballots that did not meet legal standards were counted, Gore won.

You made that up.

No I read that it in the table you posted.

 

[Billiejeens]

The instructions for fraud are in the actual manual for the actual software.

A few tiny problems there.

A. You haven't shown the manual

B. You haven't shown how it has instructions for fraud.

C. Even if it did, it would only be evidence for the possiblity of fraud, possibly by Republicans. As the Republicans are the ones with the long proud history of vote fraud, a sensible person would initially assume that Republicans are using the system to commit fraud.

D. You made claims about fraud in Georgia, and the hand recount shows those claims were baseless. And Georgia is a Republican-run state. Why would Republicans cheat for Biden?

So Uniformed
Followed by
So misinformed.

 

[Faun]

In his memoirs, Boris Bazhanov, who was personal secretary to Soviet tyrant Joseph Stalin, quotes Stalin: “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.”

Indeed.

President Donald Trump reiterated this week that he and his team are going to expose every instance of voter fraud they can find. Trump declared, “I concede nothing! We have a long way to go. This was a rigged election!”

More than 70% of Republicans indicate they do not trust the 2020 election results, and given the mounting evidence of fraud, that mistrust is justifiable. Undeniably, there were varying types of voter fraud, and the statistical case against a Joe Biden win also raises questions.

The Trump campaign’s focus includes questions about the Dominion vote-counting software now used to process 40% of votes nationwide. Campaign legal counsel Sidney Powell is staking her considerable reputation on the potential for undetected fraud.

The concerns stem from a “glitch” in one Michigan county, where Dominion ballot scanners and software converted an estimated 6,000 votes for Trump to Biden.

Fraud Watch: A Software 'Glitch'?

"If the United States is to avoid banana republic status, we need to institute more secure and reliable election procedures."

patriotpost.us

BJ's Pull quotes


According to Powell: “We have sworn witness testimony about why the software was designed. It was designed to rig elections. They did this on purpose. It was calculated. They’ve done it before. We have evidence of 2016 in California. We have so much evidence I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.”

When asked by “Sunday Morning Futures” host Maria Bartiromo if the accusations can be litigated by 14 December, when the Electoral College is expected to formalize Biden’s claimed victory, Powell said, “First of all, I never say anything I can’t prove. Secondly, the evidence is coming in so fast I can’t even process it all.” She added, “I’m very concerned it not only involved Dominion and its Smartmatic software but that the software was essentially used by other election machines also.”

She noted that the software’s user manual instructs how “votes can be wiped away,” and concluded, “It should never have been installed anywhere.” (You can view her interview with Lou Dobbs here.)

^^^ Fake news

Facts...

Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees | CISA

The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State...

www.cisa.gov

There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.​