It's just an information regulatory board...

washamericom

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2010
13,703
1,904
245
Damn it again
I was going to use that for my platform...

Everybody always takes my best ideas..

This is not a change
everything's going to be the same
except now then will be a Regulatory Commission
agency that would review/approve appropriate speech or research..


The agency that sits just below the people that approve patents and ideas or the state*
Part of the new
*fair sharing of wealth act


This benefits our country because it makes dissenting opinion non-controversial...



I just Googled

do federal information regulatory agents carry guns ?

And it came back

" don't you think Barack Obama was the greatest president in history"

Maybe I'm beginning to think so

Disinformation governance program..

Heh

Only in America
 
Last edited:
If only someone had warned us that the DHS could be turned against the Murican people!

ToldjaSo.jpg
 
This is one of the scariest things that I have come across.
Nina Jankowicz was one of the people leading the war cry of the left about Hunter Biden's laptop being fake news will be the one in charge of saying what is and what should be banned.
 
Damn it again
I was going to use that for my platform...

Everybody always takes my best ideas..

This is not a change
everything's going to be the same
except now then will be a Regulatory Commission
agency that would review/approve appropriate speech or research..


The agency that sits just below the people that approve patents and ideas or the state*
Part of the new
*fair sharing of wealth act


This benefits our country because it makes dissenting opinion non-controversial...



I just Googled

do federal information regulatory agents carry guns ?

And it came back

" don't you think Barack Obama was the greatest president in history"

Maybe I'm beginning to think so

Disinformation governance program..

Heh

Only in America
I'm trying to figure out where our gov't is empowered to regulate information under our constitution.

I can't find it in there anywhere.
 
This is one of the scariest things that I have come across.
Nina Jankowicz was one of the people leading the war cry of the left about Hunter Biden's laptop being fake news will be the one in charge of saying what is and what should be banned.
I'm wondering about a Supreme Court case will go about this and this definitely goes into the chipping away at Liberty category but it occurred to me that kilo versus New London allows the government to take property from a private owner I give it to another private or set of private owners..

at the Fifth Amendment

The good news is we can just take back anything that belongs to China Russia or Saudi.

But I would rather have Times Square without the New York Times but the government allowed generational businesses and homes to be destroyed do the New York times (Benedict Arnold Gazette)

Which leads my generation wondering where does it end...
 
I'm trying to figure out where our gov't is empowered to regulate information under our constitution.

I can't find it in there anywhere.
It will be..

Democrats try ex post facto everything !


Maybe they will just rename the Tenth Amendment like the war on statues
 
0C7F4446-9BCB-40A9-B983-BABDB595EDA8-2365433.jpg


Looks like Quentin Tarantino in drag.
Someone in the White House Press office yesterday said ask a question about her..

Not questioning the board itself ...

propose a controversial leader
then they will say
okay who do you want us to put in ?

The old reverse bait and switch

But they still get their club of the sons Board of Regents...

no matter whom the 1st overlord is

very much right out of Atlas Shrugged..


and some people will buy that

It would be fun to have watched if Trump pulled this kind of shit....

Only the Democrats know for sure
 

Forum List

Back
Top