That's why democrats want abortions to be performed by hires right off the street.
They legalized it, saying it was the only way to end back alley abortions. Now they want that to be the standard.
It's insane that they want babies killed up to the moment of birth and some even say it's okay to let the baby die after it's born alive. Seriously fucked up. PP is drooling at the thought of being able to sell fully developed baby parts.
And they will insist that all medical personnel be forced to perform these late abortions or after-birth murders. No one thinks about the psychological affect this has on those in the medical field. It would be traumatizing to kill a baby. Let's be clear, they are babies at that point. Can't pass it off as a clump of cells in the third trimester. What kind of monster would be okay with murdering a baby?
The old argument is that it would only be done to save the mother's life. News flash: They have always had a plan when a mother's life is at risk due to accident or illness. It's called an emergency C-section. It does not increase the mother's chances when the baby is killed. What this law is talking about is partial-birth abortion. It would actually pose a greater risk to the mother by either extending the birth to kill the baby or inducing labor and stopping to kill the baby.
It is clear just how much value the left places on life. They don't want mass murderers to get the death penalty, despite there being no cure or treatment for psychopaths or sociopaths. They don't want honest citizens to defend their very lives against attackers by using their choice of weapon. They don't want to save American lives by keeping drug cartels, human traffickers or terrorists out of our country. But they think killing innocent, healthy, full-term babies is something to celebrate.
It's about as sick as it gets. The liberals have given up on freedom and have bent over to the tyrannical leftists. Sad day.
This entire issue is all about reducing the population. Leftists don't care how that comes about, whether it's minorities murdering each other in cities, 100,000 people being taken each year by human traffickers, people being killed by drugs. Or terrorist strikes. It's not adding up fast enough for the leftists. Taking away our guns means that government can do what they want to us. It happened in every single socialist and communist country. Millions murdered by their own government after they were disarmed and stripped of rights. It can and will happen again. Human nature remains the same and when power-hungry tyrants gain power, they seek to control. There are too many people to control right now. especially considered how many are armed. That is all gun control has ever been about and it's sad that so many have been brainwashed to believe otherwise. It's no mystery how Hitler and other dictators were able to do what they did. We see the same exact things being said now. Hitler was Time magazine's Man of the Year. Now, they praise Obama, Hillary and the Dems. Nothing has changed except that it's a new generation of useful idiots.
I don't think you have to worry about abortionist letting babies die after the are born alive following a failed abortion attempt. Federal law requires doctors to use the same standard of care provided for those who survive abortion, regardless of their stage of development, as they would for other newborns. of development as other newborns. There is a Federal law known as
Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002, enacted August 5, 2002, (
§ 8).
1 U.S.C. The Act extends legal protection to an infant born alive. after a failed attempt at
induced abortion. It was signed into law by President
George W. Bush.
The Act did not create new laws as such; it merely classified those who survived abortion to be a person, a human being. Here is the text of the law:
(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “
human being”,
“child”, and
“individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is
born alive at any stage of development.
(b) As used in this section, the term “
born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.
1 U.S. Code: § 8 “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant
The following is a report from the House Judiciary Committee which discusses the details of the law to protect those infants who are born alive. The report is very lengthy so I have presented only excerpts from that document:
“Confusion regarding the legal status of abortion survivors is not a problem only in the United States. Evidence of this confusion can be further illustrated by events that occurred in Professor Peter Singer’s native country of Australia. On April 10, 2000, in Sydney, Australia, a Coroners Court heard testimony regarding a baby who survived an abortion in 1998 and lived for 80 minutes while hospital staff waited for the baby to die. When the midwife nurse called the abortion doctor (who was not present) to inform him that the baby had survived, he responded, ‘‘So?’’ The nurse then did what she could to make the baby comfortable, covering her with a blanket to keep her warm until her breathing and heartbeat slowed and she died.” (See page 11, 12 of the provided text.)
“H.R. 4292 draws a bright line between the right to abortion—which the Supreme Court has now said includes the right to kill partially-born children—and infanticide, or the killing or criminal neglect of completely born children. The bill reaffirms that a born-alive infant’s legal status under Federal law does not depend upon the infant’s gestational age or whether the infant’s birth occurred as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion. If, for example, an infant is born alive at a Federal hospital as a result of a failed abortion attempt, this bill makes clear that the attending physicians and other medical professionals should treat the infant just as they would treat a similarly-situated infant who was born as a result of natural labor.” (See page 13 of the provided text.)
“H.R. 4292 would amend the United States Code by expanding the definition of the words ‘‘person, human being, child, and individual’’ as they are used in any act of the Congress or any administrative ruling, regulation, or interpretation. Under the bill, such words would be defined to include every infant born alive at any stage of development. The bill also would define the term ‘‘born alive.’’ (See page 16 of the provided text.)
https://www.nrlc.org/uploads/bornaliveinfants/HJCreportBAIPA2000.pdf
The various States have their own laws which afford protections to infants who are born alive after an attempted abortion. Here is the law in my home State of Florida
Section 390.0111(12) – INFANTS BORN ALIVE
(a) If an infant is born alive during or immediately after an attempted abortion, any health care practitioner present at the time shall humanely exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the infant as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to an infant born alive at the same gestational age in the course of natural birth.
(b) If an infant is born alive during or immediately after an attempted abortion, any health care practitioner present at the time shall humanely exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the infant as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to an infant born alive at the same gestational age in the course of natural birth.
(c) An infant born alive during or immediately after an attempted abortion must be immediately transported and admitted to a hospital pursuant to s.
390.012(3)(c) or rules adopted thereunder.
(d) A health care practitioner or any employee of a hospital, a physician’s office, or an abortion clinic who has knowledge of a violation of this subsection must report the violation to the department.
(e) A person who violates this subsection commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s.
775.082 or s.
775.083. This subsection shall not be construed as a specific provision of law relating to a particular subject matter that would preclude prosecution of a more general offense, regardless of the penalty.
(Note: s. 775.083 provides for a definite term of imprisonment not exceeding 1 year, ands. 775.083, provides for a fine of $1,000.)
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine