You pretending that we didn't have just cause to go into Afghanistan?
Why don't you just change your username to, "I'm just here to be silly"?
Weren't the 9/11 Hijackers mostly just Saudis living in the USA?
THey were here for a while.
Are you actually ignorant of the series of events that led to the invasion of Afghanistan?
Cause, if so, you need to educate yourself immediately, cause your ignorance is making you look, mmmm,
let's say, not serious.
All the terrorists were living here who've ever attacked the USA.
W Bush didn't seal the border, but instead goes to war far away for little reason?
Because of where the base and organization was that launched the attack.
THe people who were here, were dead. We wanted the people that gave the order, who supported the attack, who likely would launch more attacks if left alive.
Seriously dude. How can you not know this?
There was a better case for attacking Afghanistan rather than Iraq.
None the less I'm not so sure a heck of a lot was solved in Afghanistan, much less so Iraq.
I personally think the war on terror cost more money & bloodshed than it solved...If it even solved anything.
We may have killed some terrorists but we looked like bad guys to the Muslims for doing such.
Stirring further resentment towards the USA.
Your mixing a lot of different questions together.
Was something justified? Was something effective? How did it look?
When you ask one question, and I respond to it, and then you immediately pivot to another question, without addressing my first response?
That is at best muddled thinking and at worst, active dishonesty.
I believe you are sincere in your position on this, but your muddled thinking is the type of thing some one does, when on some level, they realize that their position is weak.
Are you dropping the argument that the attack on Afghanistan was not justified? If not, address my last response to it, on that topic, not one of the other questions.