Yes, but you refuse to show the data to which it can be compared.Wouldn't you like to see evidence for the benefit of this staggering, annual expenditure?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, but you refuse to show the data to which it can be compared.Wouldn't you like to see evidence for the benefit of this staggering, annual expenditure?
Then you should show that with evidence instead of plucking ideas from your arse. Especially when education, for instance is organised nationally rather than locally...One reason I posited that places like Denmark and Sweden might be happier than those in other nations is that they are small nations with more of a "local" federalized government, unlike the U.S. or China or Russia, etc.
With the availability of google, essentially you have already dismissed all other systems as not being better.Well, then I guess we have nothing further to discuss.Don't believe that for a second.Hey, if you have a better system, I'm all ears.
BTW though, maybe you should test your theory, I just may surprise you.
So much for 'American values'.And yes, a nation like say Finland with a little over 5 million population, a far more cohesive society sharing a mostly common language and common values and ambitions
Ah. Something that has never existed, considering only a portion of Greek residents had a vote.It means nonrepresentative democracy, "pure" democracy as with the Greek demos was, at least theoretically.
Like in NZ.Unlimited democracy refers to democratic government without clear, pre-determined limits on its power (eg without a dependable constitution). Under such a government, minorities are completely at the mercy of the majority.
As I understand it, American First Nations followed a leader if they liked what he was doing but did not follow him if they did not like it.Even American Indian tribes of old and the most primitive peoples in Africa, etc. have chosen a governing body or leader to speak and decide for all.
... education, for instance is organised nationally rather than locally...
Works for us.Is that what you're advocating for - democracy with no constitutional limitations? Do you think that would be a good idea?
Why don't you just snivel about your whole premise?Well, considering how small Denmark is, their "nationalization" of education might as well be local when compared to the U.S.
Yes, but you refuse to show the data to which it can be compared.Wouldn't you like to see evidence for the benefit of this staggering, annual expenditure?
Why don't you just snivel about your whole premise?
If you can't support your own premise no one will be at all surprised.The onus is upon those who spend the money to demonstrate that it's a worthwhile expenditure.
Well, my sense of logic, agreed.It seems I really hurt your kunt.
Rather you than me with law like this...Our Constitutional Republic, whose citizens are subject solely to the rule of law, not men, is the most desirable form of government, safeguarding the rights and protected liberties of the people – regardless its ‘size.’
You dispute that. It is up to you to show it's not a worthwhile expenditure. Home schooled?The onus is upon those who spend the money to demonstrate that it's a worthwhile expenditure.
It is up to you to show it's not a worthwhile expenditure. Home schooled?
Shouldn't you show data demonstrating US education was better before a federal education agency was formed?But, as far as I can tell, government is better when it's smaller and more localized.