I am a non apologetic agnostic. Liberals are just so conflicted on this, they push secularism. And attack christian practices and mock and ridicule Christians. And, ON THE OTHER HAND, they are defending religion (as long as it's Islamic) under the guise of freedom of religion because of Trump's recent travel ban....BECAUSE these people ARE MUSLIM? Muslims are the antithesis of western liberalism. So what really gives here? Liberals have to be consistent here, either religion is something we need to protect or it's something we need to be protected FROM. Which is IT? You can't have it both ways.
I am very consistent.
I think that refugees should be admitted regardless of whether they are Christians or Muslims.
I believe in separation of church and state- regardless of whether the 'church' is Christian or Muslim.
I don't approve of the stances of many religions on many topics- but I support the right of people to worship as they believe.
I am not defending any religion- I am defending the rights of people to practice their religion.
And I am against anyone who uses religion as an excuse to deny freedoms to other people.
If those people are Muslims- then I am against those people.
But I am not against people simply because they belong to a religion which I personally disagree with.