Is This Why Kari Lake Lost?

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If we're going to start shredding the Constitution like Trump suggests we should start with that Second Amendment.
It has been outdated and obsolete for a LONG time.

Trump and his fellow rightwing nitwits never thought of that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Numbers don't lie. Discrepancies in votes for different offices are obvious,
If you can't explain why, than cheat is existent, therefore there is a fraud.
Can you explain with a proof why there are 50K votes difference between votes for Arizona Senator and Secretary of State? No?

There is neither ‘fraud’ nor ‘cheating’; the 2020 election was not ‘stolen.’

Conservatives know this to be true, but they propagate these lies regardless.

Conservatives continue to lie about ‘fraud,’ ‘cheating,’ and ‘stolen elections’ as part of their war on democracy, to hobble the political process, and undermine our democratic institutions for some perceived partisan benefit.

 

[Faun]

Numbers don't lie. Discrepancies in votes for different offices are obvious,
If you can't explain why, than cheat is existent, therefore there is a fraud.
Can you explain with a proof why there are 50K votes difference between votes for Arizona Senator and Secretary of State? No?

Yes. Not everyone votes for all races.

Meanwhile, the Democratic candidates for those 2 races got about the same number of votes as did the Republican candidates. The 50K difference, which is only 2%, came entirely from a Libertarian candidate for Senate. While there was no Libertarian candidate for Secretary of State.

You're literally making shit up and then trying to sell it as fraud.

 

[FA_Q2]

Just to check your reasoning, let me ask you simple question, unrelated to above.

I'm not saying it's the case, but hypothetically, would you consider fraud if number of counted ballots is higher than number of registered voters?
Yes or no would be enough.

You want a yes or no answer only because such an answer would necessitate ignorance of the system. If we have all the data, it is reliable, it is current and we have accounted for the number of prevernal ballots AND the process that those ballots have to go through to be counted then the obvious answer is that yes, it would be strong indication of fraud.

Where are the numbers for current registration levels being acquired from? Months before the election, when there are still people actively being registered, or after when all registrations have been processed? What are the local laws coving last minute voting and registration or provisional ballots? There are states that allow registration on the day of voting. Have you taken those registrations into account? Important questions when looking at that kind of raw data and asking the question you just did. All ignored by your set up.

So your 'question' lacks the framework with which to answer it in the first place.

It would be like me asking you what color my mouse is. Any answer you gave would be one based entirely on ignorance of the actual situation. But that just is not the case with this flat out false claim your side has been parroting for months:

Fact Checker: Were there 40,000 more votes than voters in Washoe County in 2020? No

A claim has been widely spread that Washoe County's 2020 election had 40,000 more votes than voters. This is false and based on a data file mistake.

www.rgj.com

Fact check: States don't have more than 100% voter turnout in an election

A post uses outdated data to argue there are more votes than registered voters in key battleground states. Data shows no state exceeds 100% turnout.

www.usatoday.com

No, there weren’t more votes cast than registered voters

An image widely shared on Facebook suggested that 26 million votes were fraudulently cast in the 2020 presidential elect

www.politifact.com

There were not more votes than voters in Pennsylvania

CLAIM: There were 205,000 more votes than voters in the 2020 election in Pennsylvania...

apnews.com

Sure, there is a possibility that if you construct a scenario that does not reflect any semblance of reality that more ballots cast is an indication of fraud. However, the instant you try and apply that to the actual world you find that no example exists that actually takes accurate data into account. ALL of the claims there were more votes than voters rely on either a bald faced lie about the numbers or using outdated information to base the conclusion on. Ergo, your 'example' is crap. Try again.

 

[FA_Q2]

Nah, a recent study shows Republicans die from covid at about twice the rate of Democrats...

​

There were 32K covid deaths in Arizona. That could equate to a net loss of roughly 10K Republican votes. Lake lost by 17K. Even If it wasn't enough to change the outcome of the election, it certainly would have made the margin close enough to trigger a mandated recount and that too could have possibly altered the outcome.

You left out the MOST IMPORTANT feature of that graph.

The numbers do not diverge until a certain date and then seem to grow.

I wonder what could have changed around that time...

 

[FA_Q2]

If you can't explain why, than cheat is existent, therefore there is a fraud.

LOL, no.

That is not how claims work. Being unable to explain a counter does not provide any evidence whatsoever that your claim is factual. If you cannot explain why I have an ailment, that lends zero evidence to the claim that said ailment is caused by djinns.

 

[cnm]

As long as there is an ability to prove fraud. Activist judges have so far refused to allow any evidence.

The LOTUS picks the best people all right...

 

[cnm]

When John Adam's said "the Constitution was written for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other". He was talking about Americans today.

No, he was talking about the Americans of 1860, where the Constitution was wholly inadequate.

 

[cnm]

Numbers don't lie. Discrepancies in votes for different offices are obvious,
If you can't explain why, than cheat is existent, therefore there is a fraud.
Can you explain with a proof why there are 50K votes difference between votes for Arizona Senator and Secretary of State? No?

What a dork.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

No, he was talking about the Americans of 1860, where the Constitution was wholly inadequate.

Benjamin Franklin also foresaw the corruption to come.
"I agree to this Constitution ... and I believe, further, that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.

We are the corrupted people as Franklin foresaw and without morals or religion as John Adam's warned.

 

[cnm]

Benjamin Franklin also foresaw the corruption to come.

Obviously the corruption set in very early. What could be more American?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Obviously the corruption set in very early. What could be more American?

The founders knew history quite well and knew that America like every other civilized country would eventually ruin itself. It is our bad luck to have it on our watch. Communists have been active in this country since the 30s. They have taken over the democrats.

 

[Chillicothe]

"Communists have been active in this country since the 30s.They have taken over the democrats."

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh boy!
Look CatBreath you can come out from under your elementary school desk.
You can come out from your backyard underground bunker.
Nikita ain't coming to get you.

Mon ami, you are stuck in a time-warp.
You are still living in the 1950's and still scared of the Red Scare. Still wanna be dead instead of Red.

Grow up, mein freund, that was then. This is now.
You are not only dating your avatar......but you are giving the impression of an uninformed, ill-informed grievance-ridden rube.

What's next on your menu of imaginary enemies? A cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles, including high-ranking Democrats and A-list stars, controlling the so-called "deep state" of government? Still hiding in the basement from MS-13? The 200-mile long 'caravan' of Mexicans trying to burglarize Arizona? Afraid of Lizard People?

No offense intended.

 

[bodecea]

Your groomers told you there was a right to abortion but there never was. Your hate and anger should be focused on them.

We know that righties only want to allow abortions in cases of con-venience of the sperm-donor.

 

[bodecea]

The founders knew history quite well and knew that America like every other civilized country would eventually ruin itself. It is our bad luck to have it on our watch. Communists have been active in this country since the 30s. They have taken over the democrats.

You NAZI fascists have been around since the 30s also.

 

[AsherN]

Numbers don't lie. Discrepancies in votes for different offices are obvious,
If you can't explain why, than cheat is existent, therefore there is a fraud.
Can you explain with a proof why there are 50K votes difference between votes for Arizona Senator and Secretary of State? No?

Because people vote for the races they care about. Most people don't give a flying fig who the SoS is, or know what he does.

 

[Lastamender]

Georgia U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls for Federal Investigation Over Emails from Arizona Sec State Hobbs to Twitter | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

 

[Faun]

Georgia U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls for Federal Investigation Over Emails from Arizona Sec State Hobbs to Twitter | The Georgia Star News

georgiastarnews.com

What a pity so many Arizona Republicans Darwined themselves with covid.

 

[Lastamender]

What a pity so many Arizona Republicans Darwined themselves with covid.

Talk about the facts not the people you hate.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

We know that righties only want to allow abortions in cases of con-venience of the sperm-donor.

Cool story. How do you feel about being lied to all these years?