Is this the biggest mistake of the trump era?

The fact that you people had to change the name from global warming to the nebulous "climate change" means it's a bunch of hokum. If the earth has warmed, there is no evidence that man caused it, and there is no way to predict it will continue in the future.
No evidence man caused it? You understand man's activity of burning fossil fuels has caused trillions of pounds of greenhouse gases to be emitted in to the atmosphere, right?

1778417927060.webp
 
If I had to rate the worst Presidents in US history, Trump would be in the top spot or perhaps the 2nd place spot. From my perspective, it's a toss up between Biden and Trump. Trump certainly wins the top spot in most boastful, soulless, and narcissistic.
1 and 2 would be Trump and Reagan.


BOTH corrupt TRAITORS.
 
If I had to rate the worst Presidents in US history, Trump would be in the top spot or perhaps the 2nd place spot. From my perspective, it's a toss up between Biden and Trump. Trump certainly wins the top spot in most boastful, soulless, and narcissistic.
Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree. Biden isn't on the radar of worst prez's, IMO. No prez, ever, has done as much to dismantle the constitutional order as trump. And that doesn't even touch on the horrendous policy decisions.
 
Obama giving Iran $56,000,000,000 has to be one of the biggest mistakes of any era.

"Then U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told Congress in July 2015 that Iran gained access to $56 billion via the agreement, a fact check by PolitiFact in 2018 noted."
Your own link disputes your claims
 
I'm not wrong dumbass, oil is not fertilizer. This is what I said:
"Reality is that the US doesn't get its oil from the Gulf of Hormuz"

15% of fertilizer isn't much. Farmers can adjust by planting different crops. Not a big deal.
A loss of 15% of fertilizer is a huge deal
 
1 and 2 would be Trump and Reagan.


BOTH corrupt TRAITORS.
Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, and Pierce get low marks for what they did and didn't do with respect to slavery and equal rights. Slavery being the greatest shame in our national history. But trump is doing so much damage across a panoply of areas it will take years to access the damage. And he is hands down the most corrupt prez in US history.
 
holy freakin' crap
As if we needed another example of trumples collectively shrugging their shoulders at another crisis trump has caused.
 
Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, and Pierce get low marks for what they did and didn't do with respect to slavery and equal rights. Slavery being the greatest shame in our national history. But trump is doing so much damage across a panoply of areas it will take years to access the damage. And he is hands down the most corrupt prez in US history.
The Ronald Reagan presidency is often cited as one of the most corrupt in modern U.S. history because of the sheer volume of officials involved in criminal investigations, indictments, and convictions. By the end of his two terms, at least 138 administration officials had been investigated, indicted, or convicted.

Johnson with his trail of tears.
 
The Ronald Reagan presidency is often cited as one of the most corrupt in modern U.S. history because of the sheer volume of officials involved in criminal investigations, indictments, and convictions. By the end of his two terms, at least 138 administration officials had been investigated, indicted, or convicted.

Johnson with his trail of tears.
Between the corruption, the explosion of the deficit due to tax cuts, Iran/Contra, the S&L scandal, the damage to the middle class, his obvious mental impairment over the last two years, Ron is in the top 5 worst prez's. trump is #1 by a long shot.
 
As if we needed another example of trumples collectively shrugging their shoulders at another crisis trump has caused.
And the comment itself was MAGA-level ignorant.

Oh yeah, we can just switch our entire crop business operation over in May.

God damn. Sometimes I wish I hadn't seen a post, y'know?
 
No evidence man caused it? You understand man's activity of burning fossil fuels has caused trillions of pounds of greenhouse gases to be emitted in to the atmosphere, right?

View attachment 1254719
Heh. This is like saying a table fan could alter a hurricane. Man is so tiny compared to the planet.
 

Iran Nuclear Deal: Debunking the Myths​

As members of Congress closely examine the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, various assertions are being made. Some questions are based on legitimate concerns, while other claims made by opponents of the deal are based on fiction.

We are closely tracking both and offer the following responses, which will be updated regularly.


Iran Nuclear Deal: Debunking the Myths - Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation


This war and its aftermath is a self-inflicted wound inflicted by a colossal error made by trump. Not that we've seen all of the consequences yet. It may be months or years before we do. Actions have been set in motion are beyond the control of any one person or country. The outcome is unpredictable.

Perhaps the only person who is getting what they want from this war (besides the shareholders of energy companies) is the war criminal known as Bebe. He must be hoping it will help him in the upcoming elections in Israel. He couldn't care less how many people die or how much is destroyed in pursuit of that goal. It's how he rolls. It's how his fellow war criminal rolls too.

Some critics, like John Bolton and Dick Cheney, have argued that the only way to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is through the use of military action. This shortsighted and reckless approach would be counter-productive. As former director of the CIA Michael Hayden has explained, bombing Iran “will guarantee that which we are trying to prevent: an Iran that will stop at nothing to, in secret, develop a nuclear weapon.”

Taking military action, instead of implementing the current diplomatic solution, would shatter the international coalition that is applying economic pressure and force the United States to confront Iran without international support.

Even if a US bombing campaign were effective, it would need to be repeated every few years to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, resulting in a never-ending game of “nuclear program whack-a-mole.” Furthermore, we would not have the access or monitoring afforded to us under the agreement in order to detect covert facilities.

It is important to remember that implementing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action does not take the United States military option off the table. If anything, it strengthens it by improving our understanding of the status and location of Iran’s nuclear program.
Or Iran could have had nuclear weapons and used them, coz that's where they were headed.
 
And the comment itself was MAGA-level ignorant.

Oh yeah, we can just switch our entire crop business operation over in May.

God damn. Sometimes I wish I hadn't seen a post, y'know?
The extent to which they can get themselves to alter their perception of reality because of their belief in Don's infallibility is breathtaking...............and hugely discouraging.
 
Or Iran could have had nuclear weapons and used them, coz that's where they were headed.
In trumpworld there apparently are many fantastical possibilities. None of which comport with reality.

Iran Was Nowhere Close to a Nuclear Bomb, Experts Say
 
15th post
The extent to which they can get themselves to alter their perception of reality because of their belief in Don's infallibility is breathtaking...............and hugely discouraging.
I forget the name, but there was a superhero who could just create objects out of thin air to suit his purpose in the moment.

Same vibe.
 
In trumpworld there apparently are many fantastical possibilities. None of which comport with reality.

Iran Was Nowhere Close to a Nuclear Bomb, Experts Say
Experts?

All Trump needed was one.


 
In trumpworld there apparently are many fantastical possibilities. None of which comport with reality.

Iran Was Nowhere Close to a Nuclear Bomb, Experts Say
Clearly on the path. Leftwingers ignore reality.

Witkoff says Iran ‘a week away’ from nuclear bombmaking material​


 
Clearly on the path. Leftwingers ignore reality.

Witkoff says Iran ‘a week away’ from nuclear bombmaking material​


Witkoff is a joke.

As they made their public case this week for another American military campaign against Iran, President Trump and his aides asserted that Iran has restarted its nuclear program, has enough available nuclear material to build a bomb within days, and is developing long-range missiles that will soon be capable of hitting the United States.

All three of these claims are either false or unproven.

American and European government officials, international weapons monitoring groups and reports from American intelligence agencies give a far different picture of the urgency of the Iran threat than the one the White House has presented in recent days.


Steve Witkoff, the White House’s lead negotiator in those discussions with the Iranians, said on Fox News on Saturday that Iran is “probably a week away from having industrial-grade bomb making material.”

But American officials and international weapons inspectors said that was not the case, largely because the U.S. and Israeli strikes last June badly damaged Iran’s three main nuclear sites, Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan.

Those attacks made it far more difficult for Iran to access the near-bomb-grade fuel it would need to produce a nuclear weapon quickly. Even if it were to dig it out, experts said, it would take many months — perhaps more than a year — to turn it into a warhead.

Even some of Mr. Trump’s allies in Congress have seemed to question Mr. Witkoff’s assertion that Iran could build a bomb so quickly.

“I can’t speak for Steve. I haven’t got those reports, and I’ve been read in on some of those programs,” Senator Markwayne Mullin, Republican of Oklahoma and a member of the Armed Services Committee, said on CNN this week. “I’m not saying he’s wrong or he’s right, I just haven’t seen those reports.”

Mr. Rubio acknowledged on Wednesday that there was no evidence the Iranians were currently enriching nuclear fuel.


Steve says what trump wants him to say. The truth be damned.
 
Back
Top Bottom