Is There Scientific Evidence Supporting the Floor of Noah?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's your claim and job to show transitions, but your side hasn't produced any.

Shameless, stupid lie. The fossil record is full of very obviois "transitional" fossils by any definition of the term, and thats true despite only collecting fossils of .01% of the species which have very existed.

You YEC frauds are the most shameless liars i have ever met.

 

[james bond]

There is not one shred of evidence for either. ID'ers mock evolution because they say there are gaps in the knowledge. The Great Flood myth absolutely depends on 2 things that have no evidence at all.

Fail.

 

[james bond]

I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.

So, are you saying the Torah didn't say we had any what we call "dinosaurs" today in the past?

What does the Torah call the fossil or does it deny it? I don't think secular/atheist scientists calls them skeletons or else their thinking would be along the like of creation scientists.

 

[james bond]

Shameless, stupid lie. The fossil record is full of very obviois "transitional" fossils by any definition of the term, and thats true despite only collecting fossils of .01% of the species which have very existed.

Yet, you provide no examples, but go right into your ad hominem fallacies. What a loser you are.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

I am done with this debate. The earth is billions of years old, and anybody who doesn’t think so is a Christian idiot. See ya.

the poor little bigot cant prove anything so he runs to the bathroom for some personal time,,,

its OK we still loath you,,,

There is more evidence that Jesus took it in the ass from the 12 disciples (and liked it) than the earth is 6000 years old.

I never said it was 6K old,,,

and whats the obsession with anal sex???

Ask Jesus, apparently he and John were into it.
Was Jesus gay? Probably | Paul Oestreicher
The idea that he had a romantic relationship with Mary Magdalene is the stuff of fiction, based on no biblical evidence. The evidence, on the other hand, that he may have been what we today call gay is very strong.

So how old do you believe the earth to be?

I dont know how old it is and neither do you or any one else,,,

I asked how old you believe it is. Of course know one knows for sure.

 

[james bond]

The presence of marine fossils at the top of Everest proves Evolution

plate tectonics forced those mountain ranges up at a time there were only simple simple creatures at the bottom of the sea

No dinosaur bones on top of Everest

View attachment 264261

Plate tectonics shows that the continental drift theory and creation scientists Alfred Wegener was correct. It means the present isn't the key to the past. If it was, then we'd be seeing today's monkeys becoming bipedal and human. That doesn't happen, so it shows that they weren't bipedal in the past.

Dinosaurs were part of Noah's Ark, so they were part of those that survived . As for the rest, the global flood theory shows dinosaurs died moving to a common location. It explains why they are found together in dinosaur graveyards.

Wow
Quite a theory

It shows no understanding of evolutionary theory. No, we did not descend from monkeys. We are evolving, but the process is so slow, it goes unnoticed

I have seen Jurassic Park. I would love to have seen Noah’s dinosaurs on the Ark.

Haha. Who understands evo theory? There is no evolution; it's based on fake science.

Evolution's common descent theory states that humans descended from monkeys. Else you are admitting that monkeys could not have evolved to the point of becoming bipedal. It starts with tailed monkeys which became tailless ones. There is no fossil evidence of this. This does not happen today. Yet, the secular/atheist scientists claim humans still have vestigial organs from their evolution.

 

[james bond]

I asked how old you believe it is. Of course know one knows for sure.

I thought you ran away from the forum b/c it was too much for your brain. I think it's around 6K - 10K yrs old and the evidence fits it.

 

[james bond]

You are correct; I was addressing “Bond, James Bond”, and lost track of who I was responding to.

>>Your claim specifically targeted the Bible.
If you claimed “cultures”, I wouldn’t have contested.<<

IIRC, I was asking if the Torah discusses today's "dinosaurs" found in the past? What does it call them if they do discuss?

 

[Indeependent]

I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.

So, are you saying the Torah didn't say we had any what we call "dinosaurs" today in the past?

What does the Torah call the fossil or does it deny it? I don't think secular/atheist scientists calls them skeletons or else their thinking would be along the like of creation scientists.

The Torah doesn’t mention what doesn’t impact the future of mankind.
There is one theory that the “Giants” mentioned as one of the the causes for the flood needed Dinosaurs to travel because they couldn’t use ordinary animals.
Once the flood killed off the giants, the dinosaurs were no longer needed.
Note that this is from a commentary from a few hundred years ago.

 

[james bond]

when did I call you a koo koo bird???

Post #272. Of course I may be just overly sensitive.

Can you link post #272? I'd like to read it.

 

[Indeependent]

I asked how old you believe it is. Of course know one knows for sure.

I thought you ran away from the forum b/c it was too much for your brain. I think it's around 6K - 10K yrs old and the evidence fits it.

Mankind is 6,000 years old.
For sure, Adam was not created as a baby but as a mature adult.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I asked how old you believe it is. Of course know one knows for sure.

I thought you ran away from the forum b/c it was too much for your brain. I think it's around 6K - 10K yrs old and the evidence fits it.

Mankind is 6,000 years old.
For sure, Adam was not created as a baby but as a mature adult.

SMDH

 

[james bond]

I now understand your confusion, the KJV translate both “Tah-Nihn” and “B-Hay-Mah” as Behemoth.
Completely dishonest translation.

So what do you think was described
'“Behold, Behemoth,
which I made as I made you;
he eats pgrass like an ox.

Behold, his strength in his loins,
and his power in the muscles of his belly.

He makes his tail stiff like a cedar;
the sinews of his thighs are knit together.
His bones are tubes of bronze,
his limbs like bars of iron." Job 40:15-18?

 

[alang1216]

when did I call you a koo koo bird???

Post #272. Of course I may be just overly sensitive.

Can you link post #272? I'd like to read it.

Umm... The link is there, at least for me. If not try: Is There Scientific Evidence Supporting the Floor of Noah?

 

[james bond]

There is no verse mentioning dinosaurs.

Are you saying the "dinosaurs" as we know them today didn't exist? We got plenty of fossils. What do you want to call them in the past?

I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.

We are discussing today's dinosaurs whose fossils have been found and put together. The Torah does not mention these creatures? So, the Torah is denied by science?

I'm sure Job knew about dragons and behemoths, but the Torah doesn't describe it?

 

[james bond]

when did I call you a koo koo bird???

Post #272. Of course I may be just overly sensitive.

Can you link post #272? I'd like to read it.

Umm... The link is there, at least for me. If not try: Is There Scientific Evidence Supporting the Floor of Noah?

Both of you links got to the last page or p. 20 now. What page is it on?

 

[Indeependent]

There is no verse mentioning dinosaurs.

Are you saying the "dinosaurs" as we know them today didn't exist? We got plenty of fossils. What do you want to call them in the past?

I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.

We are discussing today's dinosaurs whose fossils have been found and put together. The Torah does not mention these creatures? So, the Torah is denied by science?

I'm sure Job knew about dragons and behemoths, but the Torah doesn't describe it?

The fossils we have are bones, not skeletons.
Torah denied by science?
Do you realize how many Observant Jews are scientists and Nobel Winners.
The lack of mention simply indicates lack of importance to eternity.
For instance, the Torah does not mention Noah’s height but mentions Moshe’s height from which we can deduce Aaron’s height due to Aaron needing a step ladder to light the menorah in the Holy of Holies.
The word for dragon is actually Large Fish, not Dragon.
But Dragons sounds scarier and Romans loved it when people were superstitious and scared.

 

[progressive hunter]

the poor little bigot cant prove anything so he runs to the bathroom for some personal time,,,

its OK we still loath you,,,

There is more evidence that Jesus took it in the ass from the 12 disciples (and liked it) than the earth is 6000 years old.

I never said it was 6K old,,,

and whats the obsession with anal sex???

Ask Jesus, apparently he and John were into it.
Was Jesus gay? Probably | Paul Oestreicher
The idea that he had a romantic relationship with Mary Magdalene is the stuff of fiction, based on no biblical evidence. The evidence, on the other hand, that he may have been what we today call gay is very strong.

So how old do you believe the earth to be?

I dont know how old it is and neither do you or any one else,,,

I asked how old you believe it is. Of course know one knows for sure.

asked and answered,,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

There is no verse mentioning dinosaurs.

Are you saying the "dinosaurs" as we know them today didn't exist? We got plenty of fossils. What do you want to call them in the past?

I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.

We are discussing today's dinosaurs whose fossils have been found and put together. The Torah does not mention these creatures? So, the Torah is denied by science?

I'm sure Job knew about dragons and behemoths, but the Torah doesn't describe it?

The fossils we have are bones, not skeletons.
Torah denied by science?
Do you realize how many Observant Jews are scientists and Nobel Winners.
The lack of mention simply indicates lack of importance to eternity.
For instance, the Torah does not mention Noah’s height but mentions Moshe’s height from which we can deduce Aaron’s height due to Aaron needing a step ladder to light the menorah in the Holy of Holies.
The word for dragon is actually Large Fish, not Dragon.
But Dragons sounds scarier and Romans loved it when people were superstitious and scared.

if you say so,,,

 

[Indeependent]

There is no verse mentioning dinosaurs.

Are you saying the "dinosaurs" as we know them today didn't exist? We got plenty of fossils. What do you want to call them in the past?

I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.

We are discussing today's dinosaurs whose fossils have been found and put together. The Torah does not mention these creatures? So, the Torah is denied by science?

I'm sure Job knew about dragons and behemoths, but the Torah doesn't describe it?

The fossils we have are bones, not skeletons.
Torah denied by science?
Do you realize how many Observant Jews are scientists and Nobel Winners.
The lack of mention simply indicates lack of importance to eternity.
For instance, the Torah does not mention Noah’s height but mentions Moshe’s height from which we can deduce Aaron’s height due to Aaron needing a step ladder to light the menorah in the Holy of Holies.
The word for dragon is actually Large Fish, not Dragon.
But Dragons sounds scarier and Romans loved it when people were superstitious and scared.

if you say so,,,

I studied the NT for a few years...so many devils.