Is There Scientific Evidence Supporting the Floor of Noah?

Are secular scientists prone to exaggeration in support of accepted theories?

  • Yes, at least on occasion.

    Votes: 5 83.3%
  • No, never. They are highly respected and above tweaking data... They are above suspicion.

    Votes: 1 16.7%

  • Total voters
    6
Job 40 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre
Job 40:15...
Oy! Another botched translation.
A “b-hay-mah” is a wild animal, such as a bull or wild ox.
It’s a very common word.


didnt you say it was a fish???
I now understand your confusion, the KJV translate both “Tah-Nihn” and “B-Hay-Mah” as Behemoth.
Completely dishonest translation.
in your opinion,,,
I wouldn’t dare insert my opinion on the word of God.
There are sites that translate the words interactively.


I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
 
eats grass like an ox so its seems grass eaters need to get to the grass to eat it,,,so its a speculation,,,


'and is its tail like a cedar??? and is it considered a fish??
Job 40 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre
Job 40:15...
Oy! Another botched translation.
A “b-hay-mah” is a wild animal, such as a bull or wild ox.
It’s a very common word.


possibly,, but do an ox or bull have a tail as a cedar???

not that I've ever seen
Read the verse carefully...
It says “like a cedar”.
It’s a metaphor.
Cedar trees are used all over the Bible to indicate pride and/or strength.


if you say so,,,

so it means his tail is proud??? because if it means strength that goes to prove a massive tail and an ox or bulls tail surly is not strong
Have you ever met a wild ox?
The wild ox acts as though it is indestructible.



not its tail,,,,


upload_2019-6-7_10-6-47.webp
 
didnt you say it was a fish???
I now understand your confusion, the KJV translate both “Tah-Nihn” and “B-Hay-Mah” as Behemoth.
Completely dishonest translation.
in your opinion,,,
I wouldn’t dare insert my opinion on the word of God.
There are sites that translate the words interactively.


I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
 
Job 40 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre
Job 40:15...
Oy! Another botched translation.
A “b-hay-mah” is a wild animal, such as a bull or wild ox.
It’s a very common word.


didnt you say it was a fish???
I now understand your confusion, the KJV translate both “Tah-Nihn” and “B-Hay-Mah” as Behemoth.
Completely dishonest translation.
in your opinion,,,
I wouldn’t dare insert my opinion on the word of God.
There are sites that translate the words interactively.


I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
Almost any document, scientific or otherwise, should be read in the original language because everyone has an agenda.
 
I now understand your confusion, the KJV translate both “Tah-Nihn” and “B-Hay-Mah” as Behemoth.
Completely dishonest translation.
in your opinion,,,
I wouldn’t dare insert my opinion on the word of God.
There are sites that translate the words interactively.


I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.
 
in your opinion,,,
I wouldn’t dare insert my opinion on the word of God.
There are sites that translate the words interactively.


I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.



that explains a lot,,,
 
I wouldn’t dare insert my opinion on the word of God.
There are sites that translate the words interactively.


I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.



that explains a lot,,,
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.
 
like they say,,,
when you cant debunk the message attack the messenger,,,

there are other sources for the same info
Unless the messenger is Wikipedia, then it's OK.


wikipedia is not a person

Wikipedia is many people. Any idiot out there can add to or edit it. It's the they in they said so you can't really count on it as they are more often than not idiots. Take a look around you, it's fashionable now for they to cover themselves in idiotic tattoos and that just isn't very smart. They can go screw themselves and they often do.
 
I didnt say you did,,,
it was your claim of bad translation I was refering,,,

this is why I try and not use the bible for anything other than writtings of the times and leave god out of it on this topic,,,
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.



that explains a lot,,,
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.


thats usually the next step,,,

saying you arent educated enough for the discussion,,,

but its you bringing godzilla into it to prove your point,,,
 
It’s just that dragons are so...Godzilla.
It’s almost comical to use them in a discussion.
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.



that explains a lot,,,
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.


thats usually the next step,,,

saying you arent educated enough for the discussion,,,

but its you bringing godzilla into it to prove your point,,,
You have to relax.
Take a deep breath and see the humor in how translations are mangled over the centuries to fill an agenda.
 
youre seriously going to bring godzilla into this discussion???
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.



that explains a lot,,,
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.


thats usually the next step,,,

saying you arent educated enough for the discussion,,,

but its you bringing godzilla into it to prove your point,,,
You have to relax.
Take a deep breath and see the humor in how translations are mangled over the centuries to fill an agenda.


if you say so,,,
 
Not seriously.
I find dragons to be as viable as Godzilla.
Though Gidrah, Three Headed Monster, has always been way cooler in my opnion.



that explains a lot,,,
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.


thats usually the next step,,,

saying you arent educated enough for the discussion,,,

but its you bringing godzilla into it to prove your point,,,
You have to relax.
Take a deep breath and see the humor in how translations are mangled over the centuries to fill an agenda.


if you say so,,,
It’s an observation.
CNN, MSNBC and Fox are simply the historians of today; no different than the historians of yesterday.
 
that explains a lot,,,
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.


thats usually the next step,,,

saying you arent educated enough for the discussion,,,

but its you bringing godzilla into it to prove your point,,,
You have to relax.
Take a deep breath and see the humor in how translations are mangled over the centuries to fill an agenda.


if you say so,,,
It’s an observation.
CNN, MSNBC and Fox are simply the historians of today; no different than the historians of yesterday.


wouldnt know since I never watch them,,,
 
Yes.
Although I do agree that people without higher education gives them the authority to come to an authoritative opinion is ridiculous.


thats usually the next step,,,

saying you arent educated enough for the discussion,,,

but its you bringing godzilla into it to prove your point,,,
You have to relax.
Take a deep breath and see the humor in how translations are mangled over the centuries to fill an agenda.


if you say so,,,
It’s an observation.
CNN, MSNBC and Fox are simply the historians of today; no different than the historians of yesterday.


wouldnt know since I never watch them,,,
Good for you!
I need a good chuckle once in a while.
 
15th post
There is no verse mentioning dinosaurs.

Are you saying the "dinosaurs" as we know them today didn't exist? We got plenty of fossils. What do you want to call them in the past?
I don’t know.
Every time they find a new bone they change what the entire skeleton “looked” like.
It’s a speculative science.
 
So, unless the entire ocean is excavated, your claim is that those fossil could possibly exist?

Cool. Then when you ask people who believe in evolution where the fossils are that show transitions, refer back to this comment (and include the entire surface of the Earth).

Come now. It's your claim and job to show transitions, but your side hasn't produced any. It means there wasn't any transition. Else if you and your common ancestor theory is right, then you wouldn't hesitate to show us the transitions and beat it over our heads. You tried to do so with human fossils haha.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom