ReinyDays
Gold Member
Quite an accusation. Got any examples?You have to ask yourself why climatologists are the only scientists who refuse to follow the scientific method.
Scientology doesn't use scientific method ... does that help? ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quite an accusation. Got any examples?You have to ask yourself why climatologists are the only scientists who refuse to follow the scientific method.
Wow, you expected a robot? Is it even possible to mistake this place for a peer review board or something? Sorry, having difficulty finding your complaint credible. My intent is to be unambiguous, punchy, and fun. Not wordy, whiny, and always full of beans like some people around hereYou got me ... what is "plainly obvious" about the weasel words you're using ... "deniers", "unsurprisingly", "like crazy", "shockingly", "windfalls", "wealthy's" ... what is the logical basis of surprise or shock ... how are we to deduce these qualities, and how do we quantify them and perform an experiment to either confirm or refute these values? ...
Okay, what do you have against weasels? Don't be a fool. Be sure that ladder stays well secured to your deck railing and lays perfectly flat on the ground!Please ... what is the CO2 "roof" you speak of ... the 960,000 ppm primordial levels? ...
For the love of God ... please stop using weasel words ... they make you look like a weasel ...
I'm off to practice my tap-dancing atop a 24 foot extension ladder ... if I don't post anymore means I've fallen to my death ...
I am glad I could oblige. It was the least I could do. Never let it be said I didn't do the least I could do.This is my thread.
Couple of things I've been wanting to ask you .. so thank you for this permission ...
1] Arctic Amplification + 2nd Law of Thermodynamics ... thoughts, opinions, profanity? ...
2] Are you buying electric power to post here on the Free Market ... or are you using SOCIALISM electricity? ...
So objectivity and manners are too much to ask for?So westwall's a Scientologist?
Wow, you expected a robot? Is it even possible to mistake this place for a peer review board or something? Sorry, having difficulty finding your complaint credible. My intent is to be unambiguous, punchy, and fun. Not wordy, whiny, and always full of beans like some people around hereYou got me ... what is "plainly obvious" about the weasel words you're using ... "deniers", "unsurprisingly", "like crazy", "shockingly", "windfalls", "wealthy's" ... what is the logical basis of surprise or shock ... how are we to deduce these qualities, and how do we quantify them and perform an experiment to either confirm or refute these values? ...
Okay, what do you have against weasels? Don't be a fool. Be sure that ladder stays well secured to your deck railing and lays perfectly flat on the ground!Please ... what is the CO2 "roof" you speak of ... the 960,000 ppm primordial levels? ...
For the love of God ... please stop using weasel words ... they make you look like a weasel ...
I'm off to practice my tap-dancing atop a 24 foot extension ladder ... if I don't post anymore means I've fallen to my death ...
You mean like not butting into other's conversations just to leave pissy comments?So objectivity and manners are too much to ask for?
You mean like not butting into other's conversations just to leave pissy comments?
Yes, that is true. It really should be called polar warming. I've been saying that for awhile. But this is what happens during an interglacial cycle.HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... you poor people ... I'm still alive ... was on the 6 foot step ladder when I fell, no biggie, had the sense to snatch the paint bucket out of mid-air before it spilled ... either fly a ladder leg 6 inches off the ground ... OR tilt the ladder 30º to the horizon ... not both ... safety tip there ...
So westwall's a Scientologist?
westwall's a colander head ... existence is refutable ... with marinara ...
=====
The arctic is warming twice as fast as the equator ... energy has less force behind it moving it through the atmosphere ... thus more powerful weather events will be less likely ... less floods, less droughts, fewer hurricanes, etc etc etc ... yes, no, I'm an idiot? ...
How many power companies are you allowed to do business with? ... one? ... [smile] ... as they say in the trade ... || ...
Actually I was referring to not lying.You mean like not butting into other's conversations just to leave pissy comments?So objectivity and manners are too much to ask for?
I'm concerned that the paint bucket may be experiencing PTSD. Are you sure it's going to be okay?when I fell, no biggie, had the sense to snatch the paint bucket out of mid-air before it spilled ...
Boy, that's a lot of negatives to parse. Let's try this, quote me saying "northern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur at 280 ppm and southern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur until 750 ppm" and I'm confident a satisfactory arrangement will become feasible.If you don't lie that the northern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur at 280 ppm and southern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur until 750 ppm then there is no pissy response at all.
Yes you Blithering IDIOTDid you have a point, Mr. Mensa?
It doesn't matter as you will ass fuck the science anyway.Boy, that's a lot of negatives to parse. Let's try this, quote me saying "northern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur at 280 ppm and southern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur until 750 ppm" and I'm confident a satisfactory arrangement will become feasible.If you don't lie that the northern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur at 280 ppm and southern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur until 750 ppm then there is no pissy response at all.
Not the thread for you.Given that you believe the earth is ~6,000 years old this might not be the thread for you.
Just sayin'
What about water vapor? That was created very early. It is the greatest greenhouse gas. You change ppm on that and really upset the chemistry and atmosphere of the world. That will kill the entire planet if someone could do it. That's demonstrable with a greenhouse.
Earth’s atmosphere has a finely calibrated ratio of oxygen to nitrogen -- just enough CO2 and adequate water vapor levels to promote advanced life, allow photosynthesis (without an excessive greenhouse effect), and to allow for sufficient rainfall.
Thus, what do you think you are believing with this CO2 and ppm on it? The science of atheism.
The science of atheism found these fine tuning parameters. They found how gravity affects our greenhouse gases and atmosphere. This was from 2007 - 2011. Today, you won't be able to find the discussion of these parameters on the internet. The science of atheism has disavowed all of it due to it helping people like myself, the creationists. Stephen Hawking knew it because he either led that group or was part of the group of scientists who found them while studying the big bang.
Basically, nothing lasts 65 million years. Our common sense should tell us that rocks and fossils would not be around that long. Our planet would not be around that long. Our universe is churning into destruction.
Anyway, let's wait for the James Webb telescope to see what really is happening around us. We should learn more about our atmospheric conditions compared to other solar systems and galaxies. The science of atheism which you believe does not want to admit that we have the perfect location for life.
Okay, so just keep lying to yourself about me being a liar. Circular self-delusion.. Perfect!It doesn't matter as you will ass fuck the science anyway.Boy, that's a lot of negatives to parse. Let's try this, quote me saying "northern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur at 280 ppm and southern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur until 750 ppm" and I'm confident a satisfactory arrangement will become feasible.If you don't lie that the northern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur at 280 ppm and southern hemisphere glaciation doesn't occur until 750 ppm then there is no pissy response at all.
It's just called science. But if you want to call it the science of atheism because you have nothing else, I'm OK with that. More power to ya.Not the thread for you.Given that you believe the earth is ~6,000 years old this might not be the thread for you.
Just sayin'
What about water vapor? That was created very early. It is the greatest greenhouse gas. You change ppm on that and really upset the chemistry and atmosphere of the world. That will kill the entire planet if someone could do it. That's demonstrable with a greenhouse.
Earth’s atmosphere has a finely calibrated ratio of oxygen to nitrogen -- just enough CO2 and adequate water vapor levels to promote advanced life, allow photosynthesis (without an excessive greenhouse effect), and to allow for sufficient rainfall.
Thus, what do you think you are believing with this CO2 and ppm on it? The science of atheism.
The science of atheism found these fine tuning parameters. They found how gravity affects our greenhouse gases and atmosphere. This was from 2007 - 2011. Today, you won't be able to find the discussion of these parameters on the internet. The science of atheism has disavowed all of it due to it helping people like myself, the creationists. Stephen Hawking knew it because he either led that group or was part of the group of scientists who found them while studying the big bang.
Basically, nothing lasts 65 million years. Our common sense should tell us that rocks and fossils would not be around that long. Our planet would not be around that long. Our universe is churning into destruction.
Anyway, let's wait for the James Webb telescope to see what really is happening around us. We should learn more about our atmospheric conditions compared to other solar systems and galaxies. The science of atheism which you believe does not want to admit that we have the perfect location for life.
It means you are wrong again practicing the science of atheism. Can I say you're playing with fire?
Anyone or anything which defies or impedes or evades examination should raise a red flag. Usually they do so because they are afraid that the examination will show incongruities which they want to hide.Just because you don't examine things, doesn't make them irrational ... just because you won't listen, doesn't mean there's no definition of socialism ...
Maybe some day read you sig line ... just saying ...
Anyone or anything which defies or impedes or evades examination should raise a red flag. Usually they do so because they are afraid that the examination will show incongruities which they want to hide.Just because you don't examine things, doesn't make them irrational ... just because you won't listen, doesn't mean there's no definition of socialism ...
Maybe some day read you sig line ... just saying ...
If you want to understand the basis for my beliefs on socialism, it's going to take a little effort on your part because something tells me you aren't going to take my word for it. I didn't pull it out of thin air or without good reason.
The battle between individual and group rights appears to be the form the cosmic battle between good and evil has taken.