Laughing....and who predicted a 'Big Red Wave' in 2018 using the exact talking points you're using now?
How'd that work out?
2018 was a blessing in disguise for Trump....He learned how to finagle around a hostile House, expose the corruption and treason of the deep state, show the country Fancy Nancy is a psycho, and the Rat party will harm the US to hurt Trump. He's much better at being President than he was in 2018 and when the trade deals kick in, his economy will tell the tale....He could stop campaigning right now and win in a landslide. You're not the typical lying, name-calling Rat and it's been fun trading shots with you....adios.
Will, your theory has been tested. In 2018, Trump argued exactly what you are: that 2016 demonstrated that polls don't matter. And there was huge support for republican candidates that the polls didn't show. That there was actually a huge republican victory around the corner in the form of his 'big red wave'.
Your theory failed spectacularly. The polls were excellent indicators of the outcome of elections. There
wasn't huge support for Republican candidates that the polls didn't show. And instead of a 'big red wave' as Trump promised, we got a blue one. the democrats flipping dozens of seats and taking the House.
Which polling predicted was likely.
With your theory tested and
failing spectacularly in 2018, why do you think that *this* time your failed theory will do any better in 2020?