Is Mail-In Ballot Fraud Real? Evidence Says Yes.

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,109
34,289
2,290
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...

In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.

...

A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”

...

According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”

“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”

...


 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...
In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.
...
A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”
...
According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”
“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”
...



Using thenationalpulse.com as a reference? You really have a sense of humor. Even the Brits don't buy that rag. Why not use the National Inquirer while you are it?

In this country, we are more worried about our County Clerk selectively picking up the voting boxes like she did in 2018. BTW, she is up for reelection and the only ones that back her are the Republican Party itself. Even the republicans on the street see her as a threat to their votes. In the 2018 election, we had a total of 4 mail-in voting frauds but with that County Clerk, we had 219 miss ballots in this county only found in 2019 which was deemed to have zero effect on the 2018 election. BTW, 3 out of those 4 Mail-in Voting Frauds were Republicans including where the State Chairman for the Republican Party voted for his divorced wife who was a residence of another state. That means, the number of mail-in voter frauds is Republican 3 and everyone else 1. But the number of in person voter fraud is Republican 219 and everyone else zero. While the Chairman was charged, the County Clerk kept her job.

If you have a decent Before Election Audit, there are almost NO bad votes sent out. Then if you have a decent During Election Audit the Election is rode herd over (except in the Republican part of this state) and if you have a good After Election Audit, the things that slip through the cracks are almost all caught. If you don't have all three, you shouldn't be doing mail-in voting. In fact, if you don't have all three, you should be doing even in person voting. You would be surprise at how many states that lack those three audits and have rampant cheating.
 
I don't know why they will not just have mobile voting booth that comes to every neighborhoods. Have them escorted by the military. Once they are stationed. All the people can walk up to these mobile booth wearing their masks and vote. They have lunch wagons that are self-service. And so they can have self=service mobile voting booths.

1599558527509.png
1599558566925.png




 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...
In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.
...
A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”
...
According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”
“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”
...



There is absolutely no evidence of massive fraud in states that hold their elections entirely by mail. What happens in other countries has nothing to do with the US.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BWK
Democrats already trying to steal Pennsylvania by disenfranchising our Military.

AND SO IT BEGINS: Military Ballots Found in the Trash in Pennsylvania, All Were Trump Votes.

1600989724008.png

Mail-in ballots from our military serving overseas were dumped into the trash in Pennsylvania. The ballots were discovered during an investigation into election issues in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. They were all votes for President Trump.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office Middle District of Pennsylvania released a statement on the situation on Thursday:

On Monday, September 21, 2020, at the request of Luzerne County District Attorney Stefanie Salavantis, the Office of the United States Attorney along with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Scranton Resident Office, began an inquiry into reports of potential issues with a number of mail-in ballots at the Luzerne County Board of Elections.​

Since Monday, FBI personnel working together with the Pennsylvania State Police have conducted numerous interviews and recovered and reviewed certain physical evidence. Election officials in Luzerne County have been cooperative. At this point we can confirm that a number of military ballots were discarded. Investigators have recovered nine ballots at this time. Some of those ballots can be attributed to specific voters and some cannot. All nine ballots were cast for presidential candidate Donald Trump.​
While nine ballots have been recovered, it is not clear how many were actually discarded.

This announcement comes on the heels of a report that three trays of mail, including absentee ballots, were dumped in a ditch in Wisconsin.

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany addressed both these stories on Thursday.

Profile photo, opens profile page on Twitter in a new tab

Team Trump (Text VOTE to 88022)

@TeamTrump

White House Press Secretary @KayleighMcEnany on mail-in ballots discarded in Pennsylvania, where 100% of them were cast for President @realDonaldTrump
 
Democrats already trying to steal Pennsylvania by disenfranchising our Military.

AND SO IT BEGINS: Military Ballots Found in the Trash in Pennsylvania, All Were Trump Votes.

Mail-in ballots from our military serving overseas were dumped into the trash in Pennsylvania. The ballots were discovered during an investigation into election issues in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. They were all votes for President Trump.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office Middle District of Pennsylvania released a statement on the situation on Thursday:

On Monday, September 21, 2020, at the request of Luzerne County District Attorney Stefanie Salavantis, the Office of the United States Attorney along with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Scranton Resident Office, began an inquiry into reports of potential issues with a number of mail-in ballots at the Luzerne County Board of Elections.​

Since Monday, FBI personnel working together with the Pennsylvania State Police have conducted numerous interviews and recovered and reviewed certain physical evidence. Election officials in Luzerne County have been cooperative. At this point we can confirm that a number of military ballots were discarded. Investigators have recovered nine ballots at this time. Some of those ballots can be attributed to specific voters and some cannot. All nine ballots were cast for presidential candidate Donald Trump.​
While nine ballots have been recovered, it is not clear how many were actually discarded.

This announcement comes on the heels of a report that three trays of mail, including absentee ballots, were dumped in a ditch in Wisconsin.

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany addressed both these stories on Thursday.

Profile photo, opens profile page on Twitter in a new tab
Team Trump (Text VOTE to 88022)
@TeamTrump

White House Press Secretary @KayleighMcEnany on mail-in ballots discarded in Pennsylvania, where 100% of them were cast for President @realDonaldTrump

It's getting closer and closer that this is a task for the 2A and not for the courts. We will see.
 
Democrats already trying to steal Pennsylvania by disenfranchising our Military.

AND SO IT BEGINS: Military Ballots Found in the Trash in Pennsylvania, All Were Trump Votes.

Mail-in ballots from our military serving overseas were dumped into the trash in Pennsylvania. The ballots were discovered during an investigation into election issues in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. They were all votes for President Trump.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office Middle District of Pennsylvania released a statement on the situation on Thursday:

On Monday, September 21, 2020, at the request of Luzerne County District Attorney Stefanie Salavantis, the Office of the United States Attorney along with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Scranton Resident Office, began an inquiry into reports of potential issues with a number of mail-in ballots at the Luzerne County Board of Elections.​

Since Monday, FBI personnel working together with the Pennsylvania State Police have conducted numerous interviews and recovered and reviewed certain physical evidence. Election officials in Luzerne County have been cooperative. At this point we can confirm that a number of military ballots were discarded. Investigators have recovered nine ballots at this time. Some of those ballots can be attributed to specific voters and some cannot. All nine ballots were cast for presidential candidate Donald Trump.​
While nine ballots have been recovered, it is not clear how many were actually discarded.

This announcement comes on the heels of a report that three trays of mail, including absentee ballots, were dumped in a ditch in Wisconsin.

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany addressed both these stories on Thursday.

Profile photo, opens profile page on Twitter in a new tab
Team Trump (Text VOTE to 88022)
@TeamTrump

White House Press Secretary @KayleighMcEnany on mail-in ballots discarded in Pennsylvania, where 100% of them were cast for President @realDonaldTrump
No. It's a job for the Courts and the prosecutors.
It's getting closer and closer that this is a task for the 2A and not for the courts. We will see.
 
And they follow up trashing Military Ballots with this:

FONDA HAS ALWAYS LOVED TOTALITARIAN LEFTISTS: Kamala Harris to Appear Alongside Hanoi Jane.

Event comes one week after Biden hosted veterans outreach roundtable.

“The Biden campaign, which has bombarded President Donald Trump with attacks about his respect for U.S. soldiers, will be campaigning this weekend with Jane Fonda, a celebrity best known for fraternizing with enemy troops during the Vietnam War.”​
 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...
In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.
...
A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”
...
According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”
“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”
...



There are some states that do nothing but use mail-in ballots. Nobody has ever brought up that their elections were illegitimate.
 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...
In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.
...
A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”
...
According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”
“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”
...



There are some states that do nothing but use mail-in ballots. Nobody has ever brought up that their elections were illegitimate.


Those states took years to perfect the system.

And yeah, there are still problems.

 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...
In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.
...
A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”
...
According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”
“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”
...



There are some states that do nothing but use mail-in ballots. Nobody has ever brought up that their elections were illegitimate.


Those states took years to perfect the system.

And yeah, there are still problems.

Oh really? What did they do to perfect their systems?
 
There is absolutely no evidence of massive fraud in states that hold their elections entirely by mail.
Voter fraud does not have to be "massive" to change the outcome of an election. 50% + 1 vote can win.


While nine ballots have been recovered, it is not clear how many were actually discarded.
Exactly! ....and since we still have over a month before the counting of mass mail-in ballots is ended (in some states, several days AFTER Nov 3), there's no way to tell how many hundreds (or thousands) of legitimate votes will be thrown away in transit.


This is the FBI reporting the fraud, not some fake news reporter.
 
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the fraud involved.


...
In fact recommendations by the Council of Europe encourage no rules changes in elections one year before those elections are set to take place. “Postal voting is a huge change and such a method is being used for the first time, people aren’t used to it,” Jourova said. And while Poland may be the most evident comparison from 2020, postal voting has been the subject of controversy for many decades.
...
A leading UK charity published a report authored by Dr. Stuart Wilks-Heeg of the University of Liverpool in 2008. It said: “Greater use of postal voting has made UK elections far more vulnerable to fraud and resulted in several instances of large-scale fraud.”
...
According to the U.S.-based Crime Prevention Research Center: “Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.”
“There are 16 countries in the rest of Europe, and they are even more restrictive. Every single one bans mail-in voting for those living in the country or require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Sixty-three percent don’t allow mail-in ballots even for citizens living outside of the country.”
...



There are some states that do nothing but use mail-in ballots. Nobody has ever brought up that their elections were illegitimate.
Fake News. I don't see any all mail in voting by any state in 2016
 
There is absolutely no evidence of massive fraud in states that hold their elections entirely by mail.
Voter fraud does not have to be "massive" to change the outcome of an election. 50% + 1 vote can win.


While nine ballots have been recovered, it is not clear how many were actually discarded.
Exactly! ....and since we still have over a month before the counting of mass mail-in ballots is ended (in some states, several days AFTER Nov 3), there's no way to tell how many hundreds (or thousands) of legitimate votes will be thrown away in transit.


This is the FBI reporting the fraud, not some fake news reporter.
That's right. Left is always for the position that makes vote fraud easier and harder to detect.
The Right is always for the position that make fraud more difficult and easier to detect and prosecute.
 
There is absolutely no evidence of massive fraud in states that hold their elections entirely by mail.
Voter fraud does not have to be "massive" to change the outcome of an election. 50% + 1 vote can win.


While nine ballots have been recovered, it is not clear how many were actually discarded.
Exactly! ....and since we still have over a month before the counting of mass mail-in ballots is ended (in some states, several days AFTER Nov 3), there's no way to tell how many hundreds (or thousands) of legitimate votes will be thrown away in transit.


This is the FBI reporting the fraud, not some fake news reporter.
That's right. Left is always for the position that makes vote fraud easier and harder to detect.
The Right is always for the position that make fraud more difficult and easier to detect and prosecute.

And then they do it anyway. Can't wait for the next "Here hold my Beer Refinery" moment from Rump.
 
Democrats wanted EVERY person in the US to be able to get a COVID test on a regular basis, but they are somehow opposed to in-person voting...I have yet to hear any kind of explanation on the safeguards preventing a person from voting more than once. If mailed in ballots will be counted for a week after the election what is the safeguard to prevent a person from dropping the mail-in ballot off at the PO and then heading to the polls to vote in person? Why haven't democrats put out some kind of how vote by mail works demonstrating the entire process of receiving a ballot mailing it back in and how it's counted?

IMO democrats shouldn't get to contest anything regarding mail-in ballots since they are the ones who forced this through. 100,000 democrat votes with questionable signatures---to freaking bad toss them in the trash can.
 
Donald's handpicked FBI director says NO. But thanks for another dumb post from yet another little known loon site!

National Pulse - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not Credible


  • Overall, we rate The National Pulse Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as affiliation with a known questionable group.

Raheem Kassam (born 1 August 1986)[1] is a British political activist, former editor-in-chief of Breitbart News London, and former chief adviser to former UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage.[2] He has been described as far-right[3][4][5] and right-wing[6] by several media publications. Kassam formerly ran in the party's November 2016 leadership electionbefore dropping out of the race on 31 October 2016.[7] He was most recently the global editor-in-chief of Human Events.

Kassam was born in Hammersmith Hospital, London. His parents were Tanzanian immigrants of Indian origin from Hillingdon, Greater London.[1] He was raised an Ismaili Muslim, but wrote in 2016 that he had not been a practising Muslim for over a decade. Kassam is an atheist, stating that Christopher Hitchens' rejection of religious faith ("religions are versions of the same untruth") inspired him.[8]
 

Forum List

Back
Top