Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,874
- 90,761
- 3,635
Sorry, but I'm gonna side with the Supreme Court on this one.Abortion is a constitutional right. The fetal protection laws you reference have never been constitutionally challenged. It's been over 10 years since such laws have been past. What's taking you numbnuts so long to get them reviewed by the Supreme Court?You are ignoring that a later Court can be persuaded otherwise and you are ignoring how the fetal homicide (and other pro-life) laws which have been passed since Roe will lead to that persuasion.
... will lead to that persuasion.
Republicans vow no hearings and no votes for Obama’s Supreme Court pick
Senate Republicans on Tuesday united behind an official position on how to deal with President Obama’s expected nominee to replace the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia: no hearings, no votes and no new justice until Obama is out of office.
you really mean not adhering to the Constitutional rule of Law to manipulate the outcome to suit your own "persuasion" you then will insist others should follow as though it were a fair and honest law ... can't do it without cheating chuz.
How do you plan on forcing women to carry babies against their will?
they can hardly wait, a return to old time religion, praise Jebus ...
.
No one has the right to violate the rights of any other person. Especially children. The Supreme Court will inevitably be persuaded to reverse their previous ruling on Roe in much the same way they were compelled to reverse their own ruling on Dred Scott.
Our fetal homicide laws are large part of that legislative process. It has nothing to do with religion.
Dear Faun No, Abortion is NOT a "constitutional right" as it is not in the Constitution.
Free choice is under free exercise of religion, and not depriving people of liberty without
conviction for a crime by due process.
What was struck down as unconstitutional was the violation of "substantive due process".
It is only that the govt enforcement and process of prosecuting for abortion after the fact
would violate the women's rights.
People still have freedom to choose due to religious freedom,
because lawmakers have not agreed how to legislate on this issue
without it violating Constitutional due process or equal protection of the laws
where the women are not affected more than the men
and thus discriminated against.
It's the legal and legislative complications in addressing abortion that
are unconstitutional, but this doesn't establish abortion as a right.
(for example, even if executions end up getting banned because they
can't be administered by govt without resulting in unlawful complications or violations,
doesn't mean people have a right to murder! It just means the process of capital punishment is unconstitutional and hasn't been resolved yet so no laws meet passable standards.)