Is it time to impeach Obama ?

[DigitalDrifter]

Code language for killing the president and changing the OP and then saying "just kidding' is not legitimate. I am quite sure a number of posters have reported you.

You are trash,and I won't argue with you.

Let's put this damaged OP where it belongs, the badlands.

I didn't change it, nor did I say I was kidding. Get your facts straight.

 

[AntiParty]

If this son of a bitch goes completely rogue with some completely unacceptable immigration executive order, then I'm for taking extreme measures to get rid of this bastard once and for all !!

Impeachment has been talked about quite a bit lately, and although polls show that most Americans are against such drastic action, I think you'll see a lot more Americans get onboard for impeachment should he take action that rewards these illegals for breaking into our house. Will it be a majority ? Probably not, but it will be a sizeable percentage that will be wanting him out.
Again, it all depends on how draconian his actions are, but notice in the article it states “very significant” executive action on immigration."


Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says

Washington — President Obama will go ahead with a “very significant” executive action on immigration after the summer – a move that may well trigger impeachment proceedings against him, senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer told reporters at a Monitor breakfast Friday.

“The president acting on immigration reform will certainly up the likelihood that [Republicans] would contemplate impeachment at some point,” said Mr. Pfeiffer, who has been at the Obama White House since its inception.

A lot of people in Washington laughed off Sarah Palin’s call to impeach the president for executive overreach, Pfeiffer said, but “I would not discount that possibility.” Polling shows strong support for the idea among the GOP base, he said, adding that House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio has opened the door to the possibility with his lawsuit against Obama.


Speaker Boehner has flatly denied an interest in impeachment, saying, “I disagree” with those who support it. Next week, the GOP-controlled House is expected to pass a resolution to sue the president for executive overreach on the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare.”


“This is a fundraising exercise for Democrats,” said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel in an e-mail response to Pfeiffer’s impeachment comments. “It is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the border."

In 2012, Obama signed a memo authorizing deferred action on the deportation of certain children of illegal immigrants – the so-called “DREAMers.” Republicans cite it as an example of executive overreach and say it has encouraged the influx of unaccompanied minors from Central America. Tea party favorite Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas has urged his colleagues to reject emergency funding for the current border crisis unless the Obama administration rolls back the deferred action.

But while some may have thought the child-migrant crisis might discourage the president from further executive action on immigration, it is having the opposite effect. It has raised awareness of immigration as an issue and increased “the urgency” that the public feels in fixing it, Pfeiffer said. That gives the administration “broad permission” to take action, he said.

Given the “broken Congress,” Pfeiffer said, Obama plans to move ahead with another action after he hears advice from the attorney general and the Homeland Security secretary. His criteria will be that any executive action be on “solid legal footing” and have maximum impact.

Immigrant groups want the president to use his “prosecutorial discretion” to extend temporary protection from deportation to the millions of illegal migrants who would have qualified for a “path to citizenship” under the Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform, which has gone nowhere in the House. Politico reports he’s considering subsets of that group, based on criteria such as family ties, how long they have been in the country, and work history.

The White House, Pfeiffer said, is also considering what impact an action could have on the politics of reform going forward.

After the announcement of an action, he said, Republicans will have a choice: “Are they going to go back and try to pass comprehensive immigration reform – [after] which the president will rip up whatever executive action he does the day they pass that? Or are they basically going to set themselves up for the next two and a half years here to be arguing to elect a Republican in order to deport all these people?”

On the child-migrant crisis, Pfeiffer said Obama still supports changing a 2008 child-trafficking law that has become a sticking point in his request to Congress for $3.7 billion in emergency funding. That law has had the unintended effect of creating a huge backlog of immigration cases for unaccompanied minors in the courts. Republicans and some Democrats in Congress support changing the law to expedite the cases and deportations, but many Democrats say changing the law would deprive endangered children of their due process.

The administration is talking with members of Congress about a change. But that issue, Pfeiffer said, should not hold up funding.

On a related issue, he neither denied nor confirmed a New York Times account that the White House is considering a plan to accept refugees from Honduras whose applications are processed in that country.

Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says - CSMonitor.com

Your link is Christian Science! LOL I love both but isn't that an Oxymoron?

 

[Vigilante]

The Manchurian muslim WANTS the Republican's to impeach him.... #1, there will NEVER be enough Senators to convict the pond scum, needing 67 to vote affirmative, and there is NOT ONE MODERATE Democratic Senator in the bunch, and second, when the Repubs did it to Clinton, his POLLS went through the roof, with a 78% approval rating in the middle of the trial! Even though the newest Gallup poll has the obomanations approval at only 39% (yes subversives, look it up!) the media, the BLACK RACIST INDUSTRY, and the 2 digit IQ'd white pond scum will drive those polls!

Best bet would be to cut off all the money he's asked for, and let the House control his spending that way....Unfortunately, there are only a handful of HONEST Republican's that would do it!

When we have these SELF SERVING RINO'S willing to attack real conservatives, and VOTING most of the time with the subversives, FORGET IMPEACHMENT!

 

[Vigilante]

Code language for killing the president and changing the OP and then saying "just kidding' is not legitimate. I am quite sure a number of posters have reported you.

You are trash,and I won't argue with you.

Let's put this damaged OP where it belongs, the badlands.

Seems to me you're AFRAID to actually discuss and debate a hot topic.... Typical pond scum maneuver!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

If this son of a bitch goes completely rogue with some completely unacceptable immigration executive order, then I'm for taking extreme measures to get rid of this bastard once and for all !!

Impeachment has been talked about quite a bit lately, and although polls show that most Americans are against such drastic action, I think you'll see a lot more Americans get onboard for impeachment should he take action that rewards these illegals for breaking into our house. Will it be a majority ? Probably not, but it will be a sizeable percentage that will be wanting him out.
Again, it all depends on how draconian his actions are, but notice in the article it states “very significant” executive action on immigration."


Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says

Washington — President Obama will go ahead with a “very significant” executive action on immigration after the summer – a move that may well trigger impeachment proceedings against him, senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer told reporters at a Monitor breakfast Friday.

“The president acting on immigration reform will certainly up the likelihood that [Republicans] would contemplate impeachment at some point,” said Mr. Pfeiffer, who has been at the Obama White House since its inception.

A lot of people in Washington laughed off Sarah Palin’s call to impeach the president for executive overreach, Pfeiffer said, but “I would not discount that possibility.” Polling shows strong support for the idea among the GOP base, he said, adding that House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio has opened the door to the possibility with his lawsuit against Obama.


Speaker Boehner has flatly denied an interest in impeachment, saying, “I disagree” with those who support it. Next week, the GOP-controlled House is expected to pass a resolution to sue the president for executive overreach on the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare.”


“This is a fundraising exercise for Democrats,” said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel in an e-mail response to Pfeiffer’s impeachment comments. “It is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the border."

In 2012, Obama signed a memo authorizing deferred action on the deportation of certain children of illegal immigrants – the so-called “DREAMers.” Republicans cite it as an example of executive overreach and say it has encouraged the influx of unaccompanied minors from Central America. Tea party favorite Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas has urged his colleagues to reject emergency funding for the current border crisis unless the Obama administration rolls back the deferred action.

But while some may have thought the child-migrant crisis might discourage the president from further executive action on immigration, it is having the opposite effect. It has raised awareness of immigration as an issue and increased “the urgency” that the public feels in fixing it, Pfeiffer said. That gives the administration “broad permission” to take action, he said.

Given the “broken Congress,” Pfeiffer said, Obama plans to move ahead with another action after he hears advice from the attorney general and the Homeland Security secretary. His criteria will be that any executive action be on “solid legal footing” and have maximum impact.

Immigrant groups want the president to use his “prosecutorial discretion” to extend temporary protection from deportation to the millions of illegal migrants who would have qualified for a “path to citizenship” under the Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform, which has gone nowhere in the House. Politico reports he’s considering subsets of that group, based on criteria such as family ties, how long they have been in the country, and work history.

The White House, Pfeiffer said, is also considering what impact an action could have on the politics of reform going forward.

After the announcement of an action, he said, Republicans will have a choice: “Are they going to go back and try to pass comprehensive immigration reform – [after] which the president will rip up whatever executive action he does the day they pass that? Or are they basically going to set themselves up for the next two and a half years here to be arguing to elect a Republican in order to deport all these people?”

On the child-migrant crisis, Pfeiffer said Obama still supports changing a 2008 child-trafficking law that has become a sticking point in his request to Congress for $3.7 billion in emergency funding. That law has had the unintended effect of creating a huge backlog of immigration cases for unaccompanied minors in the courts. Republicans and some Democrats in Congress support changing the law to expedite the cases and deportations, but many Democrats say changing the law would deprive endangered children of their due process.

The administration is talking with members of Congress about a change. But that issue, Pfeiffer said, should not hold up funding.

On a related issue, he neither denied nor confirmed a New York Times account that the White House is considering a plan to accept refugees from Honduras whose applications are processed in that country.

Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says - CSMonitor.com

Your link is Christian Science! LOL I love both but isn't that an Oxymoron?

I don't know, I'm not a Christian, nor a scientist.

 

[Vigilante]

Desperate Obama White House Behind Impeachment Rumors

Live Trading News ^


Any discussion of Republicans working to impeach US President Barack Hussein Obama over any executive action he might take on immigration is “pure politics,” Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) said Friday. “The president is behind that narrative,” the 3-term GOP congressman from Louisiana said. “There has not been any discussions on the impeachment of this president. Republicans do not want to go there.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Desperate Obama White House Behind Impeachment Rumors

Live Trading News ^


Any discussion of Republicans working to impeach US President Barack Hussein Obama over any executive action he might take on immigration is “pure politics,” Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) said Friday. “The president is behind that narrative,” the 3-term GOP congressman from Louisiana said. “There has not been any discussions on the impeachment of this president. Republicans do not want to go there.

Interesting.

 

[Politico]

Obama will not be impeached. End of discussion.

 

[WheelieAddict]

No you need more real proof against him. Just because you think you have it doesn't matter. Has to be smoking gun/obvious to everyone. I'm not even saying you are wrong just need some hard evidence or it will backfire/look stupid.

 

[Toro]

No.

Instead of whining about impeachment, perhaps you would have done better had you not alienated everyone outside your base and won the election.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

If this son of a bitch goes completely rogue with some completely unacceptable immigration executive order, then I'm for taking extreme measures to get rid of this bastard once and for all !!

Impeachment has been talked about quite a bit lately, and although polls show that most Americans are against such drastic action, I think you'll see a lot more Americans get onboard for impeachment should he take action that rewards these illegals for breaking into our house. Will it be a majority ? Probably not, but it will be a sizeable percentage that will be wanting him out.
Again, it all depends on how draconian his actions are, but notice in the article it states “very significant” executive action on immigration."


Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says

Washington — President Obama will go ahead with a “very significant” executive action on immigration after the summer – a move that may well trigger impeachment proceedings against him, senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer told reporters at a Monitor breakfast Friday.

“The president acting on immigration reform will certainly up the likelihood that [Republicans] would contemplate impeachment at some point,” said Mr. Pfeiffer, who has been at the Obama White House since its inception.

A lot of people in Washington laughed off Sarah Palin’s call to impeach the president for executive overreach, Pfeiffer said, but “I would not discount that possibility.” Polling shows strong support for the idea among the GOP base, he said, adding that House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio has opened the door to the possibility with his lawsuit against Obama.


Speaker Boehner has flatly denied an interest in impeachment, saying, “I disagree” with those who support it. Next week, the GOP-controlled House is expected to pass a resolution to sue the president for executive overreach on the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare.”


“This is a fundraising exercise for Democrats,” said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel in an e-mail response to Pfeiffer’s impeachment comments. “It is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the border."

In 2012, Obama signed a memo authorizing deferred action on the deportation of certain children of illegal immigrants – the so-called “DREAMers.” Republicans cite it as an example of executive overreach and say it has encouraged the influx of unaccompanied minors from Central America. Tea party favorite Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas has urged his colleagues to reject emergency funding for the current border crisis unless the Obama administration rolls back the deferred action.

But while some may have thought the child-migrant crisis might discourage the president from further executive action on immigration, it is having the opposite effect. It has raised awareness of immigration as an issue and increased “the urgency” that the public feels in fixing it, Pfeiffer said. That gives the administration “broad permission” to take action, he said.

Given the “broken Congress,” Pfeiffer said, Obama plans to move ahead with another action after he hears advice from the attorney general and the Homeland Security secretary. His criteria will be that any executive action be on “solid legal footing” and have maximum impact.

Immigrant groups want the president to use his “prosecutorial discretion” to extend temporary protection from deportation to the millions of illegal migrants who would have qualified for a “path to citizenship” under the Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform, which has gone nowhere in the House. Politico reports he’s considering subsets of that group, based on criteria such as family ties, how long they have been in the country, and work history.

The White House, Pfeiffer said, is also considering what impact an action could have on the politics of reform going forward.

After the announcement of an action, he said, Republicans will have a choice: “Are they going to go back and try to pass comprehensive immigration reform – [after] which the president will rip up whatever executive action he does the day they pass that? Or are they basically going to set themselves up for the next two and a half years here to be arguing to elect a Republican in order to deport all these people?”

On the child-migrant crisis, Pfeiffer said Obama still supports changing a 2008 child-trafficking law that has become a sticking point in his request to Congress for $3.7 billion in emergency funding. That law has had the unintended effect of creating a huge backlog of immigration cases for unaccompanied minors in the courts. Republicans and some Democrats in Congress support changing the law to expedite the cases and deportations, but many Democrats say changing the law would deprive endangered children of their due process.

The administration is talking with members of Congress about a change. But that issue, Pfeiffer said, should not hold up funding.

On a related issue, he neither denied nor confirmed a New York Times account that the White House is considering a plan to accept refugees from Honduras whose applications are processed in that country.

Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says - CSMonitor.com

No, but it's probably time you go familiarize yourself with Federal Laws governing Impeachment. And while there, what constitutes 'terroristic threats against the President.'

 

[Delta4Embassy]

"ATLANTA—Patrick Randell McIntosh, 28, of Charleston, South Carolina, was arraigned today before United States Judge Linda T. Walker, on charges of possessing three firearms and ammunition while under indictment for a felony and for threatening the life of the president of the United States on Facebook.

“McIntosh is charged with making violent and disturbing threats online and via e-mail to several people, including a threat to the life of the president of the United States,” said United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates."
FBI ? South Carolina Man Charged with Threatening to Kill the President of the United States

Threatening the President online does get prosecuted.

 

[Hossfly]

If this son of a bitch goes completely rogue with some completely unacceptable immigration executive order, then I'm for taking extreme measures to get rid of this bastard once and for all !!

Impeachment has been talked about quite a bit lately, and although polls show that most Americans are against such drastic action, I think you'll see a lot more Americans get onboard for impeachment should he take action that rewards these illegals for breaking into our house. Will it be a majority ? Probably not, but it will be a sizeable percentage that will be wanting him out.
Again, it all depends on how draconian his actions are, but notice in the article it states “very significant” executive action on immigration."


Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says

Washington — President Obama will go ahead with a “very significant” executive action on immigration after the summer – a move that may well trigger impeachment proceedings against him, senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer told reporters at a Monitor breakfast Friday.

“The president acting on immigration reform will certainly up the likelihood that [Republicans] would contemplate impeachment at some point,” said Mr. Pfeiffer, who has been at the Obama White House since its inception.

A lot of people in Washington laughed off Sarah Palin’s call to impeach the president for executive overreach, Pfeiffer said, but “I would not discount that possibility.” Polling shows strong support for the idea among the GOP base, he said, adding that House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio has opened the door to the possibility with his lawsuit against Obama.


Speaker Boehner has flatly denied an interest in impeachment, saying, “I disagree” with those who support it. Next week, the GOP-controlled House is expected to pass a resolution to sue the president for executive overreach on the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare.”


“This is a fundraising exercise for Democrats,” said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel in an e-mail response to Pfeiffer’s impeachment comments. “It is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the border."

In 2012, Obama signed a memo authorizing deferred action on the deportation of certain children of illegal immigrants – the so-called “DREAMers.” Republicans cite it as an example of executive overreach and say it has encouraged the influx of unaccompanied minors from Central America. Tea party favorite Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas has urged his colleagues to reject emergency funding for the current border crisis unless the Obama administration rolls back the deferred action.

But while some may have thought the child-migrant crisis might discourage the president from further executive action on immigration, it is having the opposite effect. It has raised awareness of immigration as an issue and increased “the urgency” that the public feels in fixing it, Pfeiffer said. That gives the administration “broad permission” to take action, he said.

Given the “broken Congress,” Pfeiffer said, Obama plans to move ahead with another action after he hears advice from the attorney general and the Homeland Security secretary. His criteria will be that any executive action be on “solid legal footing” and have maximum impact.

Immigrant groups want the president to use his “prosecutorial discretion” to extend temporary protection from deportation to the millions of illegal migrants who would have qualified for a “path to citizenship” under the Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform, which has gone nowhere in the House. Politico reports he’s considering subsets of that group, based on criteria such as family ties, how long they have been in the country, and work history.

The White House, Pfeiffer said, is also considering what impact an action could have on the politics of reform going forward.

After the announcement of an action, he said, Republicans will have a choice: “Are they going to go back and try to pass comprehensive immigration reform – [after] which the president will rip up whatever executive action he does the day they pass that? Or are they basically going to set themselves up for the next two and a half years here to be arguing to elect a Republican in order to deport all these people?”

On the child-migrant crisis, Pfeiffer said Obama still supports changing a 2008 child-trafficking law that has become a sticking point in his request to Congress for $3.7 billion in emergency funding. That law has had the unintended effect of creating a huge backlog of immigration cases for unaccompanied minors in the courts. Republicans and some Democrats in Congress support changing the law to expedite the cases and deportations, but many Democrats say changing the law would deprive endangered children of their due process.

The administration is talking with members of Congress about a change. But that issue, Pfeiffer said, should not hold up funding.

On a related issue, he neither denied nor confirmed a New York Times account that the White House is considering a plan to accept refugees from Honduras whose applications are processed in that country.

Obama will take executive action on immigration after summer, adviser says - CSMonitor.com

The secret service and FBI must be enjoying the title of your post

What is the title of the post, Guano?

 

[Mac1958]

.

It's beginning to look like they may try it if the EO is as powerful as some are saying.

Bad idea. And it wouldn't be a coincidence he'd sign it before November, just to dare them to try.

Is the GOP going to walk straight into a sucker punch, again?

.

 

[Geaux4it]

Lets not get away from the shear fact that Obama is a complete failure on so many levels.

-Geaux

 

[Freewill]

The Obama created man made humanitarian disaster may even be more acceptable if those coming into the country would become Americans, instead of just being invaders. If they didn't demand the Mexican flag flown above the US flag. If La Raza was left in Mexico. If wearing an American flag tee shirt was not found to be unacceptable maybe we could absorb some more illegals. And it really doesn't matter if they came from Honduras or not.

I can just imagine the maturity wards in Central America and Mexico cranking out the children now that they have real opportunity in crossing into America illegally. I will imagine that the repeat offenders in CA will go down also as they too come to the land of opportunity, to steal, kill and maim. Our health care system will also improve as we deal with exotic disease brought into our country. Our school system will improve with the addition of the Spanish speaking teachers not teaching English, that would be racist, but teaching Spanish. Yes, Obama has ushered in a brave new word full of potential for the third world. And he has the potential of making another third world country.

 

[Wildman]

You are a poor chooser of words.

e.g. ?

 

[Peach]

No.

Instead of whining about impeachment, perhaps you would have done better had you not alienated everyone outside your base and won the election.

That would make sense, no room for that. As the US has money to burn, and there are no pressing issues in the world, impeach. Bush of course should have been but kept our minds on DEATH, DEBT & DEFEAT.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama wants an impeachment. He's purposely trying to cause the GOP to lose patience with him and start one.

He thinks it will drive up his approval rating.

I think if they want to do it they need to wait till they have both houses. Personally, I think it will be one of the worst episodes in American history and put a stain on this country that will last for hundreds of years. It will be very unpopular, but many will say that it was necessary. For the first time we have a president that literally hates his own country. He's doing everything he can to tarnish if not destroy it.

 

[Geaux4it]