candycorn
Diamond Member
It's xenophobic to enforce our immigration laws? How?
Let me know when a bunch of white guys from Canada and Europe end up at Alligator Auschwitz.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's xenophobic to enforce our immigration laws? How?
IF, those limits have been abused massively for decades, then it is reasonable for those limits to be set very low and very harshly, so that labor markets and social cohesion can recover over time.
This IS opposition to legal immigration.
I'm not sure how much Trump in on board with me, but I oppose legal immigration.
I want an effective BAN on immigration, for two or three generations.
Let me know when a bunch of white guys from Canada and Europe end up at Alligator Auschwitz.
You're conflating multiple issues in a way that oversimplifies the debate and leans on emotional imagery rather than clear reasoning. If your position is that enforcement is applied unevenly or unjustly at times, we can have that conversation, but enforcing immigration law in itself isn’t xenophobic.Let me know when a bunch of white guys from Canada and Europe end up at Alligator Auschwitz.
Just let me know, k?You're conflating multiple issues in a way that oversimplifies the debate and leans on emotional imagery rather than clear reasoning. If your position is that enforcement is applied unevenly or unjustly at times, we can have that conversation, but enforcing immigration law in itself isn’t xenophobic.
How many Lilly white Euro’s that are here illegally are raping robbing and murdering innocent people in America?Let me know when a bunch of white guys from Canada and Europe end up at Alligator Auschwitz.
That poster is missing some key context, possibly intentionally. Immigration from Canada or Europe isn’t the same kind of issue, not because of race, but because of scale, method of entry, economic conditions, and crime data.How many Lilly white Euro’s that are here illegally are raping robbing and murdering innocent people in America?
Very damn few if any
Warrior PrincessI frankly don't care if it is or not. If you're in this country illegally, you should be deported. Someone wants to call me a xenophobe, go right ahead, I really could care less.
Do you care about being called a "race traitor," headcase?Warrior Princess
Real men only care about being called a "Xena phobe."
RichKids Believe They've Evolved into a Separate and Superior RaceNo, but it did challenge white supremacism, and you can't have that.
You never say anything else.RichKids Believe They've Evolved into a Separate and Superior Race
It's all about Birth-Class Supremacy, which is the crime that no one is allowed to say its name.
White People Built America. America Is for Whites Only. Only Whites Can Determine the Rights of the Others.America was meant to be and always should be a White nation.
No.It’s worth pointing out that opposition to illegal immigration is often unfairly labeled as anti-immigrant, when in fact many people, including Trump, have consistently said they support legal immigration. As far as I can tell, the conflation of legal and illegal immigration seems to happen for a few reasons. Some on the left use it as a rhetorical strategy. By framing any immigration enforcement as anti-immigrant, they can cast their opponents as xenophobic, regardless of the actual policy details. Others may blur the lines because they view borders as morally arbitrary in general, so the legal distinction doesn’t matter to them. There's also a political advantage in simplifying the debate and evoking emotional responses. In reality, there's a clear difference between welcoming people through a legal process and opposing uncontrolled or undocumented entry. It’s not anti-immigrant to expect people to come legally. That’s a standard every country in the world maintains.
It’s worth pointing out that opposition to illegal immigration is often unfairly labeled as anti-immigrant, when in fact many people, including Trump, have consistently said they support legal immigration. As far as I can tell, the conflation of legal and illegal immigration seems to happen for a few reasons. Some on the left use it as a rhetorical strategy. By framing any immigration enforcement as anti-immigrant, they can cast their opponents as xenophobic, regardless of the actual policy details. Others may blur the lines because they view borders as morally arbitrary in general, so the legal distinction doesn’t matter to them. There's also a political advantage in simplifying the debate and evoking emotional responses. In reality, there's a clear difference between welcoming people through a legal process and opposing uncontrolled or undocumented entry. It’s not anti-immigrant to expect people to come legally. That’s a standard every country in the world maintains.
Humanism for Proven Sub-Humans Is a Contradiction in TermsThe founders also owned slaves and wore wigs. So naturally, we don't want to do everything they did. They created a system founded on humanistic principles, such as that of all men being created equal. And these should be what guide us rather than race.
Ignorant, racist douche ^^^.White People Built America. America Is for Whites Only. Only Whites Can Determine the Rights of the Others.
Ignorant, racist douche ^^^.America was meant to be and always should be a White nation.
I spoke the truth. America is a White nation for White people only. White people made the laws for this nation.Ignorant, racist douche ^^^.
Ignorant, racist douche ^^^.No, blacks were never meant to be citizens. Our founders were wise. Even Lincoln wanted to deport them in his second term. Only Whites were to be citizens of the new nation. Also, so what if they owned negro slaves. And one other thing, blacks are not equal to White people. They never have been. Even Lincoln stated such.