Is it fair to conflate immigration enforcement with xenophobia?

The brilliant founders never wanted blacks or Asians to be citizens of the United States.
Doesn't matter. "What the founders wanted" is irrelevant. They set into place a system which allows us to grant new rights and freedoms. Blacks and Asians are citizens and they're not going anywhere, so you'll just have to time warp back to the 1700s if you don't like it.
 
i personally know...knew a German girl deported for violating the terms of her student visa.

That's kind of vague.

If she was on a student visa and not going to school, then yes, that is justified.

You're conflating multiple issues in a way that oversimplifies the debate and leans on emotional imagery rather than clear reasoning. If your position is that enforcement is applied unevenly or unjustly at times, we can have that conversation, but enforcing immigration law in itself isn’t xenophobic.

Um, it is when white people are given preferential treatment.

Like the Germany family that came here on a bullshit asylum claim that they couldn't home school their kids, were found to not be eligible, but they are STILL here, 17 years later.
 
How many Lilly white Euro’s that are here illegally are raping robbing and murdering innocent people in America?

Very damn few if any
Oh...I thought they're being here was crime enough...at least that is what you say about brown people.

Anomalism may I present Exhibit A above?
 
People are not colors.
Saying it is only about color of skin is a strawman. Rational discrimination really is about content of character.

Notice how fake Conservatives are in that they've never called out that Commie goon, MLK, on his strawman. An honest debate requires ejecting the handlers of both controlled sides and stating what everybody knows but nobody dares to say. The Netrix has come to be for stenographers taking dictation.

It's no more rational than saying that the only reason midgets aren't playing in the NBA is because of their Munchkin voices.
 
Back
Top Bottom