Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital? (Poll)

[whitehall]

Government papers at the time noted that. Go back and read my link. This isn't some new idea.



I disagree.

Classified Government papers are often written after the event to justify atrocities. How in the world can civilized Americans justify the use of Nuclear Devices on Japanese civilians to be a warning to Allies ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Classified Government papers are often written after the event to justify atrocities. How in the world can civilized Americans justify the use of Nuclear Devices on Japanese civilians to be a warning to Allies ?

Because we knew Stalin and Russia were dangerous.

 

[daveman]

People who can’t take sides between good and evil side with evil.

Amoral people cannot make moral judgments.

 

[daveman]

Then I'd use a neutron bomb to end the infestation.

That would wipe out the entire population.

So what makes you better than them?

 

[daveman]

Your extreme ignorance is noted. Your love and support of genocide apartheid regime will have consequences.

One might well suggest that the Biden Administration stop harassing ordinary Americans who are exercising their free speech right to critique unnecessary wars and instead go after the Israel Lobby, which is a major contributing factor to why those wars are taking place at all. It would also be nice to end the hypocrisy that surrounds anything having to do with Israel in Washington. The country is no democracy, no ally, and it is a major league war criminal with possibly hundreds of thousands of dead Palestinians as evidence of its genocidal inclinations. Several hundred Congressmen cheering war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu do not change that. Apart from anything else, that the United States is involved in sustaining and providing cover for the slaughter of thousands of innocents while also pursuing its own citizens who are saying “Thou shalt not!” is an abomination.

Funny how you Jew-hating assholes never admit Hamas commits war crimes.

Now is the point you should eat shit.

 

[daveman]

You're misinterpreting my answers.
1. The OP is about Gaza today, with Hamas using schools and hospitals to store weapons and as entrances to their tunnel systems. I said NO to bombing, I prefer using ground forces to distinguish between Hamas and kids/patients.

2. Your scenario was theoretical where Hamas was assembling nuclear weapons in schools and hospitals, so my response was also nuclear.

Does Hamas wear distinctive uniforms to distinguish themselves from civilians?

No -- and that's yet another Hamas war crime.

So how are ground troops going to pick out Hamas to kill?

 

[daveman]

I’m assuming you too support raping Palestinian prisoners. Am I wrong?

So you're against raping prisoners...except for the Jewish ones?

 

[pknopp]

Classified Government papers are often written after the event to justify atrocities. How in the world can civilized Americans justify the use of Nuclear Devices on Japanese civilians to be a warning to Allies ?

If you think that was a justification.....................................

wow.

 

[PeterPilot]

The answer is "NO". I don't care if the enemy had their headquarters there. The answer is still "NO".

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/middleeast/us-munitions-israeli-strike-gaza-school-intl-latam/index.html

US-made munitions used in Israeli strike on Gaza school that killed 22, experts say​

Back in Afghanistan, the US circled a C-130 gunship over a hospital for about an hour. Did we learn that from Israel?

 

[M14 Shooter]

How in the world can civilized Americans justify the use of Nuclear Devices on Japanese civilians to be a warning to Allies ?

We didn't.
We did it to move the Japanese closer to ending the ear.
And it worked.

 

[gipper]

We didn't.
We did it to move the Japanese closer to ending the ear.
And it worked.

No. Of course, you’re wrong. Can’t fix stupid.

Japan was trying to surrender long before the bombs. The bombs were merely a war crime. No wonder you support them. You love mass murdering defenseless civilians.

 

[M14 Shooter]

No. Of course, you’re wrong.

^^^
Can't fix stupid.

 

[evelynzlon]

In honorable warfare, the combatants don't use civilians as human shields. When they do that all bets are off.

Honorable warfare? There's no honorable warfare in this world. Civilians get dragged off into foreign lands as slaves and that is the end of it. If you can manage to target the civilian population of the slavers to any advantage, go for it. Even by your theory of combatants, somebody is paying those combatants and somebody is benefiting from their activities. F**k 'em all.

 

[gipper]

Honorable warfare? There's no honorable warfare in this world. Civilians get dragged off into foreign lands as slaves and that is the end of it. If you can manage to target the civilian population of the slavers to any advantage, go for it. Even by your theory of combatants, somebody is paying those combatants and somebody is benefiting from their activities. F**k 'em all.

You might read the Geneva Convention of 1949. The US and Israel signed it and then ignored it.

The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war. They protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war).

 

[irosie91]

You might read the Geneva Convention of 1949. The US and Israel signed it and then ignored it.

The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war. They protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war).

failure to respond to fire is a military crime as is abandonment of POW's

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You might read the Geneva Convention of 1949. The US and Israel signed it and then ignored it.

The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war. They protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war).

It's true, Hamas violates the Conventions.

 

[georgephillip]

The answer is "NO". I don't care if the enemy had their headquarters there. The answer is still "NO".

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/middleeast/us-munitions-israeli-strike-gaza-school-intl-latam/index.html

US-made munitions used in Israeli strike on Gaza school that killed 22, experts say​

Your link:

"Abdul Kareem Al Assas, a resident of Nuseirat, voiced his despair. 'Where should we go? You tell us where to go and we will. This is genocide. Why are the Arab countries silent? Don’t give us food and water; we need safety… Are there resistance fighters here? There are only women, children, and elderly.'"

Israeli Jews have not changed their ultimate plan for Gaza or the West Bank since 1948. Exterminate or expel at least 80%-90% of non-Jews from those occupied territories and replace them with Jews from around the world.

The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Never Ended

"Israel was founded with the Nakba, a series of atrocities that ethnically cleansed Palestinians from their homeland.

"Today we are witnessing Israel engage in ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza on an even larger, more violent scale.

 

[gipper]

It's true, Hamas violates the Conventions.

As does your country. Traitor!

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

We didn't.
We did it to move the Japanese closer to ending the ear.
And it worked.

The nukes should of never been detonated.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As does your country. Traitor!

Putin lover says what?