Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

[Company 13]

So what? That was not the point. The point is, as I said, humans were made to procreate. How can you deny that?

You also said that "they" don't complain when I said they complain about women having children they can't afford. You asked where I got it from, so I showed you your post on this forum saying that.

 

[Leo123]

You also said that "they" don't complain when I said they complain about women having children they can't afford. You asked where I got it from, so I showed you your post on this forum saying that.

So, if a woman decides to have procreational type, unprotected, sex she could have a child she cannot afford. That's not complaining, that is fact. I also noticed you edited my quote. Cheap trick.

 

[Company 13]

So, if a woman decides to have procreational type, unprotected, sex she could have a child she cannot afford. That's not complaining, that is fact. I also noticed you edited my quote. Cheap trick.

I did not edit your quote. I took a screenshot. You said women should not have children they can't afford. That is complaining about women who DO have children they can't afford.

 

[Leo123]

I did not edit your quote. I took a screenshot. You said women should not have children they can't afford. That is complaining about women who DO have children they can't afford.

No, you gave a partial screenshot of my post, one line only. So, do you think women should have unprotected sex and children they can't afford? Oh yeah, they can always kill them right?

 

[Company 13]

No, you gave a partial screenshot of my post, one line only. So, do you think women should have unprotected sex and children they can't afford? Oh yeah, they can always kill them right?

Someone can have protected sex and still get pregnant.
Go get the rest of your post and show it to us.

 

[Leo123]

Someone can have protected sex and still get pregnant.
Go get the rest of your post and show it to us.

Then, just don't have that type of sex. It ain't rocket science you know and hey, if you insist on having that kind of sex, even protected, at least make a mutual commitment not to kill the baby. How about YOU get the rest of my post? You're the one that cut most of it off.

 

[Company 13]

No, you gave a partial screenshot of my post, one line only. So, do you think women should have unprotected sex and children they can't afford? Oh yeah, they can always kill them right?

 

[Leo123]

OK, thanks, so what's the problem with my post? Why do you disagree?

 

[beagle9]

Ew, cringe.

How stupid are you really ???

 

[Concerned American]

Someone can have protected sex and still get pregnant.
Go get the rest of your post and show it to us.

It is a violation of board rules to post a partial text box or change the context of a post you are replying to. He should report you.

 

[Company 13]

Then, just don't have that type of sex. It ain't rocket science you know and hey, if you insist on having that kind of sex, even protected, at least make a mutual commitment not to kill the baby. How about YOU get the rest of my post? You're the one that cut most of it off.

I reposted it with the entire thing. It doesn't change anything.

 

[beagle9]

For all the idiots today that want to run their idiotic mouths about not wanting to go through the growing pains that made this nation one of the greatest nation's under God on earth.

Dicks mind is so sharp at 100 year's young. Pay attention to his early day's of marriage and his fond memories of life and family.

This is for all you lefty libs that think you need to control your lives as if you would be a bad person if you got married poor or if you had a baby while being poor.

 

[Company 13]

OK, thanks, so what's the problem with my post? Why do you disagree?

You claimed you didn't know anyone who gripes about women having children they can't afford and asked where I got that information. I showed your post with your griping about women having children they can't afford.
By the way, I never intended to hide anything. I just cropped it that way. I went to delete it, but apparently my time is up for editing.

 

[Company 13]

It is a violation of board rules to post a partial text box or change the context of a post you are replying to.

I went back and read the rules and you are wrong. I didn't change the context. And it's not against rules to post a partial text box.

 

[Leo123]

You claimed you didn't know anyone who gripes about women having children they can't afford and asked where I got that information. I showed your post with your griping about women having children they can't afford.
By the way, I never intended to hide anything. I just cropped it that way. I went to delete it, but apparently my time is up for editing.

How is stating the truth 'griping?' Is the truth somehow tiresome and annoying to you?

 

[Leo123]

I went back and read the rules and you are wrong. I didn't change the context. And it's not against rules to post a partial text box.

It's disingenuous to quote a partial statement anyway. It's also lazy not to read your own post before posting. You were so rabid to play 'gotcha' you forgot the subject.

 

[Company 13]

How is stating the truth 'griping?' Is the truth somehow tiresome and annoying to you?

You were not neutral on the topic of women having babies they can't afford. You were saying it's wrong, and that is what I call griping about their choices.

 

[Company 13]

It's disingenuous to quote a partial statement anyway. It's also lazy not to read your own post before posting. You were so rabid to play 'gotcha' you forgot the subject.

I didn't forget the subject. I showed you where you griped about women having babies they can't afford. But I did gotcha.

 

[Concerned American]

You were not neutral on the topic of women having babies they can't afford. You were saying it's wrong, and that is what I call griping about their choices.

Stating an opinion is not griping or complaining and just because YOU call it griping does not change the fact. That is your opinion as well, sounds like, according to you, you are complaining and again you're off topic.

 

[Leo123]

You were not neutral on the topic of women having babies they can't afford. You were saying it's wrong, and that is what I call griping about their choices.

Why should I be neutral on any topic? So you can claim some kind of 'gotcha' victory? Stats show single mothers is not a good thing for the kids or society. There is plenty of factual evidence, that is not 'griping,'

'The father’s absence from the family has been shown to be a major disadvantage to the children’s well-being.'

https://dads4kids.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/THE-FACTS-ON-FATHERLESSNESS-2025.pdf