Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

[OODA_Loop]

Not expensive, but way harder than anti-abortionists who have zero knowledge about the female body think. And y'all oppose sex ed too which is ironic because with very basic sex ed, you'd know this.

• Pregnancy is dated from the first day of the last menstrual period.
• Ovulation (and conception) usually happen at week 2.
• A missed period usually happen at week 4.
• At week 6, the woman has missed one or possibly no period.

Note that:

• Missing a period is very common,
• Early signs of pregjancy show up at week 6, but can easily be mistaken for PMS.
• Many wait with testing to see if bleeding starts.

Also:

• Birth control may cause no regular bleeding atcall making it hard to know if it has failed.
• Teens don't know their bodies yet and may not yet have regular cycles.
• Preteens can get pregnant even before their first period.

I am not anti-abortion.

Responsible abortion. It’s a state right.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Oh, that's so cute.
Let's see if you can follow this logic.
If more women are being treated now for depression than in the past, that does not mean there is more depression now. It means there's more treatment now.
I'm betting you can't follow the logic. But you proved nothing with your stats.
If you don't understand this, get a junior high kid to explain it to you.

A feminist is the female version of a male chauvinist.

Depression is the result of thinking and living in the past. Anxiety is due to thinking and living in the future. When folk think and live in the present, most of their worries evaporate. Not my opinion, it's the psychologist's opinion.

 

[Trickster]

I am not anti-abortion.

Responsible abortion. It’s a state right.

Nope, states cannot regulate basic rights. Women have the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

 

[X.Onasis]

It's not surprising that the anti-woman stance on this thread is promoted and supported by the same people who support the demented rapist they voted for.

 

[DonGlock26]

No there doesn't have to be more cases to have more being treated. That you believe that shows your inability to understand logic.

You can stop repeating A is A. It makes no sense in this context, and Ayn Rand was a deplorable person.

You don't get treated or recorded without being a case first.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Nope, states cannot regulate basic rights. Women have the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

Not according to the Supreme Court

 

[Company 13]

You don't get treated or recorded without being a case first.

Oh, I'm going to have to draw you a picture.

Let's say in one era there are 1000 depressed women and 100 are treated.
Let's say in a later era there are 500 depressed women and 200 are treated.


See there? There can be more treatment without ther being more cases. Perhaps in a later era, more went for treatment because the stigma of getting treatment was not as bad.

Tip: There are people out there who play with statistics to fool people like you. People like you are easily duped, especially with statistics. You're just plain gullible. Try to be more logical.

One more thing. Yes it is possible for someone to be treated for depression without actually being depressed.

 

[DonGlock26]

Oh, I'm going to have to draw you a picture.

Let's say in one era there are 1000 depressed women and 100 are treated.
Let's say in a later era there are 500 depressed women and 200 are treated.


See there? There can be more treatment without ther being more cases. Perhaps in a later era, more went for treatment because the stigma of getting treatment was not as bad.

Tip: There are people out there who play with statistics to fool people like you. People like you are easily duped, especially with statistics. You're just plain gullible. Try to be more logical.

One more thing. Yes it is possible for someone to be treated for depression without actually being depressed.

You have NO IDEA who is depressed UNLESS they seek treatment and become a case.

Anything else you need help with?

 

[Company 13]

You have NO IDEA who is depressed UNLESS they seek treatment and become a case.

Do you imagine that your statement in any way disputes the fact I presented that having more treatment for depression doesn't mean there's more depression?
Or did you finally understand when I presented the logic in simple numbers?

In case you forgot, here it is again. No charge. Just showing everyone that I'm right and you're wrong is payment enough.

Let's say in one era there are 1000 depressed women and 100 are treated.
Let's say in a later era there are 500 depressed women and 200 are treated.


See there? There can be more treatment without ther being more cases. Perhaps in a later era, more went for treatment because the stigma of getting treatment was not as bad.

 

[DonGlock26]

Do you imagine that your statement in any way disputes the fact I presented that having more treatment for depression doesn't mean there's more depression?
Or did you finally understand when I presented the logic in simple numbers?

In case you forgot, here it is again. No charge. Just showing everyone that I'm right and you're wrong is payment enough.

Let's say in one era there are 1000 depressed women and 100 are treated.
Let's say in a later era there are 500 depressed women and 200 are treated.


See there? There can be more treatment without ther being more cases. Perhaps in a later era, more went for treatment because the stigma of getting treatment was not as bad.

You can make up all the numbers you wish. I'll stick to actual studies.

 

[Company 13]

You can make up all the numbers you wish. I'll stick to actual studies.

I was right and you were wrong.

The fact remains that having more people treated for depression doesn't mean there are more cases of depression than there were before. I proved it.

I didn't say your facts from the study were wrong. l'm saying the interpretation of the facts was wrong. And if the study you got that from used those stats to prove there's more depression now, they are intentionally trying to fool gullible people.

 

[initforme]

How is it not an issue of yours?

Its been settled. President Trump did a great job in announcing Roe is overturned. He has settled the issue and good on him. I applaud the outcome. So that combined with theres been no abortion in my immediate family makes it a NON ISSUE for me. Not, not not my concern.

 

[DonGlock26]

I was right and you were wrong.

The fact remains that having more people treated for depression doesn't mean there are more cases of depression than there were before. I proved it.

I didn't say your facts from the study were wrong. l'm saying the interpretation of the facts was wrong. And if the study you got that from used those stats to prove there's more depression now, they are intentionally trying to fool gullible people.

I’ll stick to actual data. You can stick to emotional reasoning.

 

[Company 13]

I’ll stick to actual data. You can stick to emotional reasoning.

That is hilarious.

I think you have a good case for suing the school you attended. You obviously don't understand simple logic. I'll testify on your behalf and use our discussion here as exhibit one.

 

[DonGlock26]

That is hilarious.

Trust the science.

 

[Company 13]

Trust the science.

I have no complaint about the statistics you presented. I have an issue with you erroneous interpretation of the stats.
I notice you can't rebut the explanation I posted.

 

[DonGlock26]

I have no complaint about the statistics you presented. I have an issue with you erroneous interpretation of the stats.
I notice you can't rebut the explanation I posted.

Your speculation has no meaning. You refuse to accept the study out of emotion.

 

[Company 13]

Your speculation has no meaning. You refuse to accept the study out of emotion.

It wasn't speculation. I simply showed you that more people being treated doesn't mean more people are depressed.
It's enough for me to know that other people understand that even if you don't. But if you don't you are not capable of logic thought.

 

[DonGlock26]

It wasn't speculation. I simply showed you that more people being treated doesn't mean more people are depressed.
It's enough for me to know that other people understand that even if you don't. But if you don't you are not capable of logic thought.

You can’t prove any of your speculation. The study stands.

 

[Company 13]

You can’t prove any of your speculation. The study stands.

The study was just stats. It did not attempt to interpret the stats as you did.
Remember there absolutely CAN be more treatment for depression without there being more depression. I proved that. You have not proved that there was more depression. You just wish it were so. Maga.