Is Being Homosexual Genetic?

[miketx]

So the dad blew a load of fag semen huh?

You’re talking about Trump who has the hots for male dictators. I hear Trump is into S and M with tough guys.....like Putin.

Notice how it's always the same M.O. with all these lying faggots? They try to put words in your mouth and fail every time.

 

[Weatherman2020]

So the dad blew a load of fag semen huh?

You’re talking about Trump who has the hots for male dictators. I hear Trump is into S and M with tough guys.....like Putin.

Notice how it's always the same M.O. with all these lying faggots? They try to put words in your mouth and fail every time.

The Left using homosexuality as a put down says it all.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I certainly hope so. I want to see what the Left do when women start getting abortions because their baby has the Homo gene.

WHAT WOULD YOU SAY: Is Being Gay Genetic? - HillFaith

It’s all but an article of faith among gay rights advocates that same-sex attraction is rooted in genetics, therefore, the argument goes, it is not a question of moral choice, but nature. A decade or two ago, public discussion of the search for “the gay gene” was common, but not so much in more...

hillfaith.blog

First of all, the question of whether or not being gay is genetic or not is a gross oversimplification of the issue and reflects an abysmal understanding of the complexity of human .sexuality.

Secondly, gay people, their friends and allies and most others are hardly dwelling on it and any importance assigned to it is for academic purposes. For most gay folks and others, they are who they are and that is that.

I might also point out that throughout all of the protracted legal fights for same sex marriage and over other issues pertaining to gay rights, the courts never concerned themselves with the question of why people are gay, and simply declared it as an innate , immutable characteristic. Even those fighting against gay rights had the good sense as to not raise that issue in court.

These days, the only ones concerning themselves with that question -for the most part- are those that are seeking to limit gay rights by delegitimizing and marginalizing homosexuals. They dumb it down to the genetic vs not genetic dichotomy where the absence of a gay gene means that it must be a it as a frivolous and decadent choice.

And your reference to women aborting children if they know that they are gay is as ignorant and wanting as your knowledge-or lack thereof - about all of the biological and social factors that contribute to the development of human sexual attraction

You don't fool anyone.

A "gay gene" is the holy grail of the radical homosexual lobby.. There is however, no evidence that such a gene exists, in fact the search has pretty well established it in fact does not. Further, the concept of "homosexual" appears to be more political than scientific. Humans are pleasure seekers. The quest for sexual pleasure is nothing if not adaptive. We all know that homosexuality is routine in all male prisons and both the British and American Navies have a long history of homosexual behavior on long sea voyages. Young boys were commonly brought along in the British fleet for the sexual pleasure of the officers and selected crew. Boys don't get pregnant.

The homosexual lobby tries and paint a picture of "orientation" when in fact "opportunity" appears to be far more of a factor.

 

[Blues Man]

What does it matter if homosexuality is genetic or not?

life is short so why not be happy?

I don't care who a person chooses to love as long as they are happy and neither should you.

Through homosexuality the Left was born, chicks with dicks was born.
Had good, decent, normal people stood firmly against homosexuality we would have no Left today.
FUCK HOMOSEXUALITY AND FUCK POLE PUFFERS, RUG MUNCHERS AND CHICKS WITH DICKS.

You do know that there have been homosexuals since there have been people don't you?

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and there always has been and always will be people who are homosexual and that percentage of the population has been pretty stable.

And really why is it any of your business?

My old man would often say...”Son, if you can’t support EVERYONE doing something you shouldn’t support ANYONE doing it.”
For me, man on man butt sex is synonymous with beastiality and pedophilia. It’s just sexually deranged whackos performing unnatural sex acts. I can’t support that shit.

What 2 consenting adults do is none of your business.

And I fully support minding my own business and IMO everyone should mind their own business.

And you do know that heterosexuals perform anal sex don't you?

 

[Blues Man]

You do know that there have been homosexuals since there have been people don't you?

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and there always has been and always will be people who are homosexual and that percentage of the population has been pretty stable.

And really why is it any of your business?

Correction, there has been homosexual ACTIVITY since antiquity. The idea that a person is a homosexual arose during Medieval Europe. The Greeks and Romans tolerated homosexual acts, the Huns and Muslims executed those who engaged in such acts. The militant homosexual lobby loves to claim Plato was a homosexual, but he wasn't. Oh, Plato enjoyed young boys to be sure, but he also liked women. Socrates said Plato was a man driven by the base lusts and the desire for pleasure.

and what makes you think there weren't homosexuals before the historical record existed?

 

[Blues Man]

What does it matter if homosexuality is genetic or not?

life is short so why not be happy?

I don't care who a person chooses to love as long as they are happy and neither should you.

Glad to know you’re for aborting babies with the homo gene.

Wow you better be careful you'll hurt yourself with stretches like that.

Oh, so it does matter if there’s a homo gene.
You flip flop faster than Biden

You don't read very well do you?

I never said it mattered if homosexuality was genetic or a choice because it doesn't

 

[Weatherman2020]

What does it matter if homosexuality is genetic or not?

life is short so why not be happy?

I don't care who a person chooses to love as long as they are happy and neither should you.

Glad to know you’re for aborting babies with the homo gene.

Wow you better be careful you'll hurt yourself with stretches like that.

Oh, so it does matter if there’s a homo gene.
You flip flop faster than Biden

You don't read very well do you?

I never said it mattered if homosexuality was genetic or a choice because it doesn't

Glad you’ll have no issue aborting babies because they have the homo gene then.

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

You're a gd lair. And a faggot.

Nope I'm happily married to a woman and have been for 20 years.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

Why do you people always use the words “afraid” or “scared” when decent, moral , normal folks express their preferences for who/what type of society they want to live in?
Why is one “afraid” if he/she supports the idea of an established normality and societal boundaries?
What do you think it is that separates first world civilized societies from the free for all, anything goes, no boundaries thirdworld shitholes?

The fact is that it is normal for a certain percentage of the population to be homosexual.

If you bothered to learn anything about human behavior you would know this.

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and that continuum has always included homosexuality

 

[Blues Man]

What does it matter if homosexuality is genetic or not?

life is short so why not be happy?

I don't care who a person chooses to love as long as they are happy and neither should you.

Glad to know you’re for aborting babies with the homo gene.

Wow you better be careful you'll hurt yourself with stretches like that.

Oh, so it does matter if there’s a homo gene.
You flip flop faster than Biden

You don't read very well do you?

I never said it mattered if homosexuality was genetic or a choice because it doesn't

Glad you’ll have no issue aborting babies because they have the homo gene then.

It's not my business if a woman has an abortion.

 

[miketx]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

You're a gd lair. And a faggot.

Nope I'm happily married to a woman and have been for 20 years.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

Why do you people always use the words “afraid” or “scared” when decent, moral , normal folks express their preferences for who/what type of society they want to live in?
Why is one “afraid” if he/she supports the idea of an established normality and societal boundaries?
What do you think it is that separates first world civilized societies from the free for all, anything goes, no boundaries thirdworld shitholes?

The fact is that it is normal for a certain percentage of the population to be homosexual.

If you bothered to learn anything about human behavior you would know this.

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and that continuum has always included homosexuality

Nothing normal about lapping another mans pee shaft. It's ok if you do though.

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

Nowadays, probably not nearly as much. The media glorifies homosexuality to such a degree nowadays, as well as the existence of gay organizations like Act Up and the Boy Scouts , the need for face to face recruitment isn't as necessary.

They never did.

I guess I'm just not scared of gay people like you seem to be

I'm not fearful of homos at all, I'm confident in my ability to defend my own manhood. I'm just more concerned about the young people they seek to bring into their movement.

You can say its "natural" for someone to take it in the caboose or shove a gerbil up there. But I just don't see it and don't think it should be glorified.

Your examples are nonsensical.

Care to take a guess how many straight men end up in the E.R. every year because they "fell" and got something stuck in their asses?

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

You're a gd lair. And a faggot.

Nope I'm happily married to a woman and have been for 20 years.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

Why do you people always use the words “afraid” or “scared” when decent, moral , normal folks express their preferences for who/what type of society they want to live in?
Why is one “afraid” if he/she supports the idea of an established normality and societal boundaries?
What do you think it is that separates first world civilized societies from the free for all, anything goes, no boundaries thirdworld shitholes?

The fact is that it is normal for a certain percentage of the population to be homosexual.

If you bothered to learn anything about human behavior you would know this.

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and that continuum has always included homosexuality

Nothing normal about lapping another mans pee shaft. It's ok if you do though.

You don't seem to grasp the concept of what a continuum is.

Get back to me when and if you can understand it

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

You're a gd lair. And a faggot.

Nope I'm happily married to a woman and have been for 20 years.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

Why do you people always use the words “afraid” or “scared” when decent, moral , normal folks express their preferences for who/what type of society they want to live in?
Why is one “afraid” if he/she supports the idea of an established normality and societal boundaries?
What do you think it is that separates first world civilized societies from the free for all, anything goes, no boundaries thirdworld shitholes?

The fact is that it is normal for a certain percentage of the population to be homosexual.

If you bothered to learn anything about human behavior you would know this.

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and that continuum has always included homosexuality

Nothing normal about lapping another mans pee shaft. It's ok if you do though.

The fact that you call a penis a "pee shaft" only illustrates your immaturity

 

[miketx]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

You're a gd lair. And a faggot.

Nope I'm happily married to a woman and have been for 20 years.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

Why do you people always use the words “afraid” or “scared” when decent, moral , normal folks express their preferences for who/what type of society they want to live in?
Why is one “afraid” if he/she supports the idea of an established normality and societal boundaries?
What do you think it is that separates first world civilized societies from the free for all, anything goes, no boundaries thirdworld shitholes?

The fact is that it is normal for a certain percentage of the population to be homosexual.

If you bothered to learn anything about human behavior you would know this.

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and that continuum has always included homosexuality

Nothing normal about lapping another mans pee shaft. It's ok if you do though.

You don't seem to grasp the concept of what a continuum is.

Get back to me when and if you can understand it

Suck man meat all you want. You'll die from it.

 

[Polishprince]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

Nowadays, probably not nearly as much. The media glorifies homosexuality to such a degree nowadays, as well as the existence of gay organizations like Act Up and the Boy Scouts , the need for face to face recruitment isn't as necessary.

They never did.

I guess I'm just not scared of gay people like you seem to be

I'm not fearful of homos at all, I'm confident in my ability to defend my own manhood. I'm just more concerned about the young people they seek to bring into their movement.

You can say its "natural" for someone to take it in the caboose or shove a gerbil up there. But I just don't see it and don't think it should be glorified.

Your examples are nonsensical.

Care to take a guess how many straight men end up in the E.R. every year because they "fell" and got something stuck in their asses?

A man isn't that straight at all, if he is shoving live animals up his ass.

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

You're a gd lair. And a faggot.

Nope I'm happily married to a woman and have been for 20 years.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

Why do you people always use the words “afraid” or “scared” when decent, moral , normal folks express their preferences for who/what type of society they want to live in?
Why is one “afraid” if he/she supports the idea of an established normality and societal boundaries?
What do you think it is that separates first world civilized societies from the free for all, anything goes, no boundaries thirdworld shitholes?

The fact is that it is normal for a certain percentage of the population to be homosexual.

If you bothered to learn anything about human behavior you would know this.

ALL human behavior exists on a continuum and that continuum has always included homosexuality

Nothing normal about lapping another mans pee shaft. It's ok if you do though.

You don't seem to grasp the concept of what a continuum is.

Get back to me when and if you can understand it

Suck man meat all you want. You'll die from it.

I am not a homosexual.

I'm just not afraid of gay people like you are

 

[miketx]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

Nowadays, probably not nearly as much. The media glorifies homosexuality to such a degree nowadays, as well as the existence of gay organizations like Act Up and the Boy Scouts , the need for face to face recruitment isn't as necessary.

They never did.

I guess I'm just not scared of gay people like you seem to be

I'm not fearful of homos at all, I'm confident in my ability to defend my own manhood. I'm just more concerned about the young people they seek to bring into their movement.

You can say its "natural" for someone to take it in the caboose or shove a gerbil up there. But I just don't see it and don't think it should be glorified.

Your examples are nonsensical.

Care to take a guess how many straight men end up in the E.R. every year because they "fell" and got something stuck in their asses?

Counting you?

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

Nowadays, probably not nearly as much. The media glorifies homosexuality to such a degree nowadays, as well as the existence of gay organizations like Act Up and the Boy Scouts , the need for face to face recruitment isn't as necessary.

They never did.

I guess I'm just not scared of gay people like you seem to be

I'm not fearful of homos at all, I'm confident in my ability to defend my own manhood. I'm just more concerned about the young people they seek to bring into their movement.

You can say its "natural" for someone to take it in the caboose or shove a gerbil up there. But I just don't see it and don't think it should be glorified.

Your examples are nonsensical.

Care to take a guess how many straight men end up in the E.R. every year because they "fell" and got something stuck in their asses?

A man isn't that straight at all, if he is shoving live animals up his ass.

That's an urban legend

 

[Blues Man]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

Nowadays, probably not nearly as much. The media glorifies homosexuality to such a degree nowadays, as well as the existence of gay organizations like Act Up and the Boy Scouts , the need for face to face recruitment isn't as necessary.

They never did.

I guess I'm just not scared of gay people like you seem to be

I'm not fearful of homos at all, I'm confident in my ability to defend my own manhood. I'm just more concerned about the young people they seek to bring into their movement.

You can say its "natural" for someone to take it in the caboose or shove a gerbil up there. But I just don't see it and don't think it should be glorified.

Your examples are nonsensical.

Care to take a guess how many straight men end up in the E.R. every year because they "fell" and got something stuck in their asses?

Counting you?

nope

But a friend of mine is an ER doctor and he should know

 

[miketx]

No, homosexuality isn't genetic. If it was, the Homo Community wouldn't be so hot-to-trot to recruit fresh meat.

They would realize that those efforts are pointless.

Further, the number of homos would be steady, if it was genetic. The number of guys who are light in the loafers has increased exponentially since the 1970's.

Homosexuals do not "recruit"

Nowadays, probably not nearly as much. The media glorifies homosexuality to such a degree nowadays, as well as the existence of gay organizations like Act Up and the Boy Scouts , the need for face to face recruitment isn't as necessary.

They never did.

I guess I'm just not scared of gay people like you seem to be

I'm not fearful of homos at all, I'm confident in my ability to defend my own manhood. I'm just more concerned about the young people they seek to bring into their movement.

You can say its "natural" for someone to take it in the caboose or shove a gerbil up there. But I just don't see it and don't think it should be glorified.

Your examples are nonsensical.

Care to take a guess how many straight men end up in the E.R. every year because they "fell" and got something stuck in their asses?

u sick freak.
A man isn't that straight at all, if he is shoving live animals up his ass.

That's an urban legend

Nothing legendary about shoving animals up your ass you sick freak.