Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,491
- 58,493
- 3,565
A muslim democratic country?So are some Muslims. So what? You are too steeped in white supremacist talking points to have a rational discussion about this.
Where?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A muslim democratic country?So are some Muslims. So what? You are too steeped in white supremacist talking points to have a rational discussion about this.
You're not exactly an unbiased opinion, you have an axe to grind, it appears,Orchestrated? You give others far too much credit. The muslim weirdos did exactly what they said for decades that they wanted to do and would do, in Iran.
Can't you read?Of course he was not a good leader
How many autocrats are?
Are you saying the crazy mullah was a good leader?
If so thats laughable
Western style white Christian democracies do not happen overnight
But given the opportunity to set roots they can be achieved even in iran
They have certainly never forgotten that.The Shah was an autocrat, but in the middle east then and now who isnt?
And he was friendly to the US
Did you say something sensible that I may have missed?Can't you read?
Iran wants to blow up the worldThey have certainly never forgotten that.
And they are no longer under threat on their eastern border. Pakistan is far more friendly to Iran then they will be to us.
View attachment 931107
Did you say something sensible that I may have missed?
If so shoot it by me again
With the muslim death cult? Indeed.You're not exactly an unbiased opinion, you have an axe to grind, it appears,
Not interfering in democratic countries' elections in favor of oil companies is better than doing so.I said the Shah was better than the ayatollahs.
We agree!I said the Shah was better than the ayatollahs.
Not interfering in democratic countries' elections in favor of oil companies is better than doing so.
A muslim democratic country?
Where?
Unless the conflict results in oil having control. The intervention in Iran that ruined things was not in the interest of the American people, the British people or the Iranian people.The oil companies prefer the US government stay out of it completely. They always screw things up. The British model is even worse. Oilmen are not there to change their religion or culture and traditions. They are there to produce petroleum.
Iran and Iraq have been through hell because of US government interference.
Remember. The oil business hates a fucking war zone.
Then there's this bit of idiocy.
U.S. Emergency Oil Supply Pact With Israel
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org
BTW, the Arabs have their own democratic representation process.. it's called Majlis.
Unless the conflict results in oil having control. The intervention in Iran that ruined things was not in the interest of the American people, the British people or the Iranian people.
Why does the American taxpayer have any responsibility to Israel? Why should we even concern ourselves with their war? Is it because we provide them most of their munitions, including all those cool armored bulldozers, or is it some other reason? Is the Christian assembly powerful enough to say we need to declare war?
All depends on who is in office. Think about that. The Christian assembly in this country, if organized and involved in politics, will lead us there.
The Israelis can pick a fight that disrupts the oil business and then....
No, I must say I have notHave you never heard of Majlis?