Republicans don't seem to understand the basics of Nuclear Physics.
Republicans have a hard time explaining to the rest of the world how they think Iran can get a Nuclear bomb when they had (no longer have) only 19.75% enriched Uranium, and then they only stockpiled enough to maybe make one Hiroshima-sized Uranium bomb.
And that took decades to stockpile, and they gave it all away to Russia. Bye bye stockpile.
Meanwhile...
Iran has NO OTHER PATHWAY to a Nuclear bomb.
They destroyed their Plutonium reactor.
Their current reactors do not have the right fuel paths to create the right isotopic ratios to make weapons' grade material.
There's absolutely no path to a Nuclear bomb right now in Iran.
Can Republicans please explain the exact path that Iran would take to make a bomb, then cite the actual infrastructure that exists to prove their point?
Republicans have a hard time explaining to the rest of the world how they think Iran can get a Nuclear bomb when they had (no longer have) only 19.75% enriched Uranium, and then they only stockpiled enough to maybe make one Hiroshima-sized Uranium bomb.
And that took decades to stockpile, and they gave it all away to Russia. Bye bye stockpile.
Meanwhile...
Iran has NO OTHER PATHWAY to a Nuclear bomb.
They destroyed their Plutonium reactor.
Their current reactors do not have the right fuel paths to create the right isotopic ratios to make weapons' grade material.
There's absolutely no path to a Nuclear bomb right now in Iran.
Can Republicans please explain the exact path that Iran would take to make a bomb, then cite the actual infrastructure that exists to prove their point?