Instead of destroying A $211 billion industry that touches ALL our lives, why not use wastewater to absorb CO2?

[BULLDOG]

Billions in grants to the scientists, who mostly work for the government.

Trillions in subsidies paid to the companies installing and manufacturing Alternative/Renewable energy

So do you think all those people who work for the government want to destroy American industry, which would destroy their jobs?

 

[BULLDOG]

The scientists sucking off the climate change government grant tits those scientists?

Well, whether they are workng for the government, or not. Destroying American industry would destroy their jobs.

 

[elektra]

So do you think all those people who work for the government want to destroy American industry, which would destroy their jobs?

they wont lose their jobs, why would they lose their jobs? Besides, they are getting rich, so what does it matter to them.

 

[healthmyths]

Uh huh...

October 2022...


10% will require 3,460 power plants.

Today...

60% will require 8,040 power plants.

Your full of shit and even a 4 year old can see that your math is bonkers.

You obviously are myopic have a half a brain because you have no concept of change!
Tell me do you still think the earth is flat? Are you still wearing the underpants you wore when you were 5 years old?
Based on your ignorance that there is constant change, you probably are a perfect example of a Luddite!
Each of the power plant variations were based on different assumptions but sadly I have only one perception of you.
You don't believe in change.
Plus you are truly an example of a half-ass contributor...
Here is what was the cause of the variation and I quote:
"For every 10% of American cars/trucks becoming EVs means 3,460 power plants have to be built."

For your dumb ass quote: "60% will require, 8,040 power plants"
The following is based on this:

A dramatic new EPA rule will force up to 60% of new US car sales to be EVs in just 7 years​

A dramatic new EPA rule will force up to 60% of new US car sales to be EVs in just 7 years

The EPA is expected to make a groundbreaking announcement this week that will make EVs the majority of new US car sales by 2032.

electrek.co

So in 7 years that would be a total for 96,250,000 EV Trucks the EPA didn't seem to address!!!
Trucks get an average of 1.89kWh/mile for 1,600,434,492,927 driven miles
a total of 3,024,821,191,633 kWh just by the Trucks.
The average power station generates 376,244,806 kWh/ plant, thus there will be a need for
8,040 NEW power plants at a cost of $2,000/kWh.

And so the distinctions but again YOU have NO CONCEPT of things are calculated based on inputs!
BASED on inputs! You understand?

 

[healthmyths]

18 days ago, you said we would need 68,000+ new plants.

Now it is 8,000.

You're just not making any sense.

So how many people in the USA in 1900?
According to the 1900 census, the population of the United States was then 76.3 million.

Map of the Foreign-Born Population of the United States, 1900 | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

Map of the Foreign-Born Population of the United States, 1900 | According to the 1900 census, the population of the United States was then 76.3 million. Nearly 14 percent of the population—approximately 10.4 million people—was born outside of the United States. Drawn by America’s labor...

www.gilderlehrman.org

Show many people in the USA in 2023?
the U.S. population increases from 336 million people in 2023

The Demographic Outlook: 2023 to 2053

In CBO’s projections, the U.S. population increases from 336 million people in 2023 to 373 million people in 2053. Population growth is increasingly driven by net immigration, which accounts for all population growth beginning in 2042.

www.cbo.gov

Hmmm...So using Candycorn's illogic there should NOT be an increase because NO CHANGES are possible!

Therefore per Candycorn there could NOT MORE power plants.
BUT according to the below..there are 855 MORE! Wait Candyporn.... how could that be???

 

[EMH]

Co2 does nothing.

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data


And hence there is no reason for intelligent humans to waste time thinking about Co2. Co2 is not the cause of Earth climate change. The position of land near the poles and tectonic plate movement is...

 

[healthmyths]

18 days ago, you said we would need 68,000+ new plants.

Now it is 8,000.

You're just not making any sense.

Hey keep pointing out how truly ignorant you are of how simple math works! As I generally document what I generate,
keep it up because you are just showing your ignorance! Want any more examples how the word "dynamic" means?

 

[candycorn]

Hey keep pointing out how truly ignorant you are of how simple math works! As I generally document what I generate,
keep it up because you are just showing your ignorance! Want any more examples how the word "dynamic" means?
View attachment 796779

So how many people in the USA in 1900?
According to the 1900 census, the population of the United States was then 76.3 million.

Map of the Foreign-Born Population of the United States, 1900 | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

Map of the Foreign-Born Population of the United States, 1900 | According to the 1900 census, the population of the United States was then 76.3 million. Nearly 14 percent of the population—approximately 10.4 million people—was born outside of the United States. Drawn by America’s labor...

www.gilderlehrman.org

Show many people in the USA in 2023?
the U.S. population increases from 336 million people in 2023

The Demographic Outlook: 2023 to 2053

In CBO’s projections, the U.S. population increases from 336 million people in 2023 to 373 million people in 2053. Population growth is increasingly driven by net immigration, which accounts for all population growth beginning in 2042.

www.cbo.gov

Hmmm...So using Candycorn's illogic there should NOT be an increase because NO CHANGES are possible!

Therefore per Candycorn there could NOT MORE power plants.
BUT according to the below..there are 855 MORE! Wait Candyporn.... how could that be???
View attachment 796770

You obviously are myopic have a half a brain because you have no concept of change!
Tell me do you still think the earth is flat? Are you still wearing the underpants you wore when you were 5 years old?
Based on your ignorance that there is constant change, you probably are a perfect example of a Luddite!
Each of the power plant variations were based on different assumptions but sadly I have only one perception of you.
You don't believe in change.
Plus you are truly an example of a half-ass contributor...
Here is what was the cause of the variation and I quote:
"For every 10% of American cars/trucks becoming EVs means 3,460 power plants have to be built."

For your dumb ass quote: "60% will require, 8,040 power plants"
The following is based on this:

A dramatic new EPA rule will force up to 60% of new US car sales to be EVs in just 7 years​

A dramatic new EPA rule will force up to 60% of new US car sales to be EVs in just 7 years

The EPA is expected to make a groundbreaking announcement this week that will make EVs the majority of new US car sales by 2032.

electrek.co

So in 7 years that would be a total for 96,250,000 EV Trucks the EPA didn't seem to address!!!
Trucks get an average of 1.89kWh/mile for 1,600,434,492,927 driven miles
a total of 3,024,821,191,633 kWh just by the Trucks.
The average power station generates 376,244,806 kWh/ plant, thus there will be a need for
8,040 NEW power plants at a cost of $2,000/kWh.

And so the distinctions but again YOU have NO CONCEPT of things are calculated based on inputs!
BASED on inputs! You understand?

This is sad.

18 days ago you said we'd need 68K new plants. Today it was like 8,040 or something. The US population didn't change much in 18 days.

 

[healthmyths]

This is sad.

18 days ago you said we'd need 68K new plants. Today it was like 8,040 or something. The US population didn't change much in 18 days.

But the inputs changed!

• 60% versus 80%.
• Cars only vs cars/trucks.
• 60% of all cars/trucks
• 60% of new car/truck sales.

All variables that changed but again you don't seem to understand that simple fact. The word you don't seem to understand is:
DYNAMIC!

 

[candycorn]

But the inputs changed!

• 60% versus 80%.
• Cars only vs cars/trucks.
• 60% of all cars/trucks
• 60% of new car/truck sales.

All variables that changed but again you don't seem to understand that simple fact. The word you don't seem to understand is:
DYNAMIC!

Again, it shrank from 18,000 to 8,000 in 18 days.

You're simply embarrassing yourself at this point.

 

[BluesLegend]

Well, whether they are workng for the government, or not. Destroying American industry would destroy their jobs.

Government hacks are not concerned about the private sector one iota.

 

[healthmyths]

Again, it shrank from 18,000 to 8,000 in 18 days.

You're simply embarrassing yourself at this point.

See you are just like the biased MSM! YOU present just the information that YOU bias!
AGAIN..
The inputs changed!

• 60% of just cars sold being versus
• 80% all the 228,000,000 drivers of cars becoming EVs.
• 60% of all cars/trucks

All variables that changed but again you don't seem to understand that simple fact.
The word you don't seem to understand is: DYNAMIC!
The only words I believe that don't change for you is: "CHANGE YOUR DIAPER"!!!

 

[candycorn]

See you are just like the biased MSM! YOU present just the information that YOU bias!
AGAIN..
The inputs changed!

• 60% of just cars sold being versus
• 80% all the 228,000,000 drivers of cars becoming EVs.
• 60% of all cars/trucks

All variables that changed but again you don't seem to understand that simple fact.
The word you don't seem to understand is: DYNAMIC!
The only words I believe that don't change for you is: "CHANGE YOUR DIAPER"!!!

Again...you're just embarrassing yourself with these posts. Fellow conservatives think you're batshit crazy too.

 

[BULLDOG]

they wont lose their jobs, why would they lose their jobs? Besides, they are getting rich, so what does it matter to them.

If their goal is destroying American industry, the destruction of American must needs end their jobs.

 

[elektra]

If their goal is destroying American industry, the destruction of American must needs end their jobs.

they dont care

 

[healthmyths]

Again...you're just embarrassing yourself with these posts. Fellow conservatives think you're batshit crazy too.

How stupid for your comment! You provide NO FACTS!
Here are MY FACTS!
From the Dept of Transportation. Trucks will require 3.024 Trillion kWh per year!
Now where are YOUR facts???
What facts do you provide?

 

[Crick]

Billions in grants to the scientists, who mostly work for the government.

Trillions in subsidies paid to the companies installing and manufacturing Alternative/Renewable energy

And how will all that money help them when the nation - the whole world I guess - is reduced to a stone age existence? Wow... they must be really stupid.

 

[elektra]

And how will all that money help them when the nation - the whole world I guess - is reduced to a stone age existence? Wow... they must be really stupid.

The rich and powerful who trade lithium, cobalt, iron, copper, silica, etc., on Wall St. are getting filthy rich. Have you looked at the prices, they have skyrocketed. Government has created great demand, resulting in prices going up on things that were about worthless when they bought them, to worth trillions.

Stone age existence, that is when the sun goes down and there is no electricity being produced.

 

[Crick]

The rich and powerful who trade lithium, cobalt, iron, copper, silica, etc., on Wall St. are getting filthy rich. Have you looked at the prices, they have skyrocketed. Government has created great demand, resulting in prices going up on things that were about worthless when they bought them, to worth trillions.
Stone age existence, that is when the sun goes down and there is no electricity being produced.

The lithium ion battery was invented by a fellow named Lewis Urry who was employed by the Everready Battery company in Canada. He also invented the alkaline battery.

Lewis Urry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It was not invented by government and it was not the government that developed the demand.

 

[elektra]

The lithium ion battery was invented by a fellow named Lewis Urry who was employed by the Everready Battery company in Canada. He also invented the alkaline battery.

Lewis Urry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It was not invented by government and it was not the government that developed the demand.

I did not say the government invented the lithium battery, I said the government created great demand. A huge difference, but I am more than happy to show that our government is spending billions researching the technology for this scam you call renewable/alternative/sustainable

U.S. awards $2.8 billion in grants for electric vehicle batteries in 12 states

The Biden administration on Wednesday awarded $2.8 billion in grants to build and expand domestic manufacturing of batteries for electric vehicles in 12 states.

www.pbs.org

Bringing batteries back to life: Research groups get federal funding for recycling projects

If the clean energy transition is going to happen, a massive amount of batteries will be needed. Many will be manufactured, but just as many will be recycled to power the increasing number of elect…

www.sandiegouniontribune.com

Xiong to advance sodium ion battery technology with Office of Naval Research grant

When we place a battery into a child’s remote control car, we know that there...

www.boisestate.edu

A Coalition for Energy Innovation | Recharge Nevada

Recharge Nevada is a state-wide initiative to collaboratively build an innovation ecosystem around the lifecycle of lithium batteries.

www.unr.edu