"31,000 scientists and experts who agreed"...

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2011
29,738
11,141
900
Before I share what these 31,000 agree to, I want anyone with links and proof to answer this simple question made up of:
1) There are 3 trillion trees in the world...
FACT: Science | AAAS
2) Each tree absorbs about 48 lbs of Co2:
FACT:How Much CO2 Does A Tree Absorb?
3) The annual emissions of Co2 is 34 billion tons.
FACT: CO2 emissions
Question... If 3 trillion trees at absorb 48 lbs/tree/year which would be 72 billion tons of Co2
and the total Co2 emissions per year is 34 billion tons which are absorbed by the 3 trillion trees, what is the problem?
SO...

The Big Green Lie—that carbon dioxide is a pollutant
is so pervasive that even those considered skeptics—including right-wing NGOs and pundits—generally adhere to the orthodoxy, differing not in their stated belief that CO2 is a pollutant but only in how calamitous a pollutant it is.
The 2008 Oregon Petition, spearheaded by a former president of the National Academy of Science and championed by Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein’s successor at Princeton and one of the world’s most preeminent scientists, was signed by more than 31,000 scientists and experts who agreed that “the proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.… Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

So why then did the USA congress pass this truly wasteful boondoggle of a bill?
Biden spoke more about an immediate effect on Americans’ day-to-day lives: creating jobs.
“When I think of climate change,” as he has often said before and after being elected president, “I think of jobs.”
What an absolutely DUMB ASS FOOL! Did Biden think of the 9.8 million jobs or 5.6 percent of total U.S. employment, in oil and gas industry. jobs when said:
"I want you to look into my eyes, I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels”


What kind of dummy believes this truly ignorant person... the same dummies that can't subtract 34 billion emitted Co2
from 72 billion ABSORBED and still think there is a problem!!!
 
The Climate movement is a movement where no matter what you do, it will never be enough to fix climate change

But those things that the climate movement employs, whatever that may have been, they will say has bought us all time and made us all a little better off for it.

That's all you need to know about the movement, other than the fact you need to consistantly be willing to surrender more and more and more of your personal freedom and wealth to fight climate change.

Again, it's like Covid, there is no end to it.
 
Biden spoke more about an immediate effect on Americans’ day-to-day lives: creating jobs.
“When I think of climate change,” as he has often said before and after being elected president, “I think of jobs.”

Yes, Biden is thinking specifically about his job and those of the democrats in Congress and around the country. Have we forgotten the promise of millions of high-paying, shovel-ready jobs when the democrats passed their $862 billion Stimulus Bill back in 2009? I haven't, and I do not believe for one second that this bill will be any better. AND it comes at a time when we are fighting both inflation and economic stagnation, neither of which this spending bill will help.

This bill is a naked attempt by the democrats to get more votes in November, plus reward their financial benefactors as much as they could get away with. Make no mistake, they couldn't care less about the rest of us.
 
Never forget, according to the climate gurus in Paris, if EVERY COUNTRY does what they committed to do under the Paris Climate "accords," global temperatures will increase by one degree (C) LESS than if "we" do nothing at all, a hundred years out. Less than one degree.

"We" need to focus on engineering solutions and spend our money there. Killing our own economy in the campaign to save the planet is..........stupid.
 
Climate Change is a vehicle to kick in wealth for a true, global 1 percent. Economic packages stuffed with provisions for Climate Change hurt the economy.
1 degree for the 1%

Should be a good campaign slogan for the DNC.
 
When the forest burns down, all that carbon is released again. So it's not going away.
Oh...that's a very good point! Burned trees won't capture Co2 for sure. Hmmm so just to burn the trees to keep from absorbing Co2 would mean at least half of the trees (1.5 Trillion) would still be able to absorb ALL the Co2 emitted.
Hmmm.. Strange isn't ?
 
The Soviet Union was the worst polluter in the world. All in the name of Socialist Republics.
 

Forum List

Back
Top