Inspectors General Refuse Trumps Illegal Firing Order

[Frankenstein]

Last chance. Come up with a question you didn't pull out of your ass and I'd be glad to disabuse you of any trumpist belief you hold tight.

I asked the question, and this line of deflection is expected

 

[martybegan]

Because AGs can’t arrest people for doing something they don’t like, dipshit.

Last I checked we are a nation of laws. If the country is so broken that anyone can be arrested anytime for any reason, then we got problems way bigger than a made up presidential immunity can fix.

We were a nation of laws, before Dems went after Trump with lawfare from 5 directions and overprosecuted the J6 people.

 

[Marener]

We were a nation of laws, before Dems went after Trump with lawfare from 5 directions and overprosecuted the J6 people.

Ah yes. The unprecedented attack on the rule of law when we prosecuted Trump for, checks notes, taking and hiding classified government documents in his basement.

You sure you want to go with that one?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's the fat orange criminal, for ya.

He managed to turn what could have been a perfectly legal process into a crime spree.

That's just who he is.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I don't. Got any more stupid questions?

Why do you worship an uneducated plutocrat?!

Replace This RichKid Reich Scam with Giving the Talented the Same Thing Preppies Get

"Uneducated" means "unbrainwashed at the Eweniversities." The whole foundation of that educational fraud is based on the submissive and anti-talent propaganda that students deserve the jobs they are given for going four years without a job. In other words, unConstitutional indentured servitude.

 

[Edgetho]

Replace This RichKid Reich Scam with Giving the Talented the Same Thing Preppies Get

"Uneducated" means "unbrainwashed at the Eweniversities." The whole foundation of that educational fraud is based on the submissive and anti-talent propaganda that students deserve the jobs they are given for going four years without a job. In other words, unConstitutional indentured servitude.

They did that in the Soviet Union in case you slept through it. Or were too stoned or stupid to see it.

For College Admissions, the Soviets (and their Bloc) used a point system that heavily favored the Sons and Daughters of factory workers and Farmers, leaving behind the sons and daughters of Doctors and Scientists.

How'd that work out??

Another Leftist that lives in the Land of Theory. You need to stay there. Leave reality to those of us that can handle it

 

[martybegan]

Ah yes. The unprecedented attack on the rule of law when we prosecuted Trump for, checks notes, taking and hiding classified government documents in his basement.

You sure you want to go with that one?

And Biden did the same thing, but worse because he did it when he was a Senator or VP, and crickets from you twats.

I'll go with it, and cram it up your well used ass.

 

[Marener]

And Biden did the same thing, but worse because he did it when he was a Senator or VP, and crickets from you twats.

I'll go with it, and cram it up your well used ass.

Are you saying that if Biden hadn’t had classified documents in his home, you would have fully supported prosecuting Trump?

That’s right. Because you think that all presidents take home classified documents. It’s something you made up to cope with Trump’s corruption.

 

[martybegan]

Are you saying that if Biden hadn’t had classified documents in his home, you would have fully supported prosecuting Trump?

That’s right. Because you think that all presidents take home classified documents. It’s something you made up to cope with Trump’s corruption.

I'm saying both cases are nothing, but because you guys have a hard on for Trump, you make shit overblown.

They do.

 

[Marener]

I'm saying both cases are nothing, but because you guys have a hard on for Trump, you make shit overblown.

They do.

Sure. It’s not like we’ve ever prosecuted people for having top secret documents before.

Trump was the first one ever.

 

[martybegan]

Sure. It’s not like we’ve ever prosecuted people for having top secret documents before.

Trump was the first one ever.

He was the first former President, and all executive power, including classifying documents, flows from his elected Constitutional power.

who has more of a right to classified information, the director of the CIA or the President?

 

[Marener]

He was the first former President, and all executive power, including classifying documents, flows from his elected Constitutional power.

who has more of a right to classified information, the director of the CIA or the President?

We aren’t talking about the president. We are talking about a FORMER president.

No one has the right to keep classified government documents in their basement.

The idea that the government wouldn’t pursue this matter is idiotic.

 

[martybegan]

We aren’t talking about the president. We are talking about a FORMER president.

No one has the right to keep classified government documents in their basement.

The idea that the government wouldn’t pursue this matter is idiotic.

Who was President when those documents were created and classified.

That the government would turn a paperwork issue into a prosecution due to Dems getting on the lawfare train is what's idiotic.

And it cost you the election, something you just. Don't. Seem. To. Get.

 

[Marener]

Who was President when those documents were created and classified.

That the government would turn a paperwork issue into a prosecution due to Dems getting on the lawfare train is what's idiotic.

And it cost you the election, something you just. Don't. Seem. To. Get.

Right. Just paperwork. Top secret classified documents are just papers. No big deal. Not like anyone would think that’s anything unusual.

Oh, and don’t forget lying to the DoJ, tampering with witnesses, trying to destroy evidence. Just a paperwork issue sprinkled with numerous felonies to obstruct the investigation.

Who ever heard of something like that being prosecuted? First time ever.

 

[berg80]

I asked the question, and this line of deflection is expected

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and the committee’s top Democrat, Dick Durbin (Illinois), on Tuesday demanded that President Donald Trump “immediately” comply with the law by giving Congress the required 30-day notice regarding the firing of inspectors general from 18 offices.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/28/trump-presidency-news/

You're a fool.

 

[martybegan]

Right. Just paperwork. Top secret classified documents are just papers. No big deal. Not like anyone would think that’s anything unusual.

Oh, and don’t forget lying to the DoJ, tampering with witnesses, trying to destroy evidence. Just a paperwork issue sprinkled with numerous felonies to obstruct the investigation.

Who ever heard of something like that being prosecuted? First time ever.

Actually we weren't really told how classified the documents were. You are just guessing.

And yet where are the charges for all that?

Yep, first time ever, another Democratic assault on the rule of law.

 

[Marener]

Actually we weren't really told how classified the documents were. You are just guessing.

And yet where are the charges for all that?

Yep, first time ever, another Democratic assault on the rule of law.

Ah, but you’re wrong. The special counsel laid it out in their court filings.

The charges were filed in Florida. Didn’t you know that?

The point here is that you’re trying to say that this prosecution is some violation of the rule of law despite the fact that all kinds of people have been prosecuted for this EXACT thing.

 

[martybegan]

Ah, but you’re wrong. The special counsel laid it out in their court filings.

The charges were filed in Florida. Didn’t you know that?

The point here is that you’re trying to say that this prosecution is some violation of the rule of law despite the fact that all kinds of people have been prosecuted for this EXACT thing.

And they are gone. Because it was a stunt from the start to get Trump to remove himself from the election.

It failed. Miserably. Just like the NY case and the Georgia Case.

All failed.

Suck it up, buttercup.

 

[Marener]

And they are gone. Because it was a stunt from the start to get Trump to remove himself from the election.

It failed. Miserably. Just like the NY case and the Georgia Case.

All failed.

Suck it up, buttercup.

You keep dodging the point.

The point is that no one should be surprised the government prosecuted someone hiding highly classified documents in their basement. The idea that this is all just political defies logic.

 

[konradv]

You keep dodging the point.

The point is that no one should be surprised the government prosecuted someone hiding highly classified documents in their basement. The idea that this is all just political defies logic.

Logic? He missed that class!