That's the issue isn't it. The authorities have to prove that he accessed the internet to post this video. They can't say "it's on the internet so therefore you did it". If they had proof, there would have been a probation violation hearing set. There isn't so they haven't been able to prove it.
That's the way it works, there isn't a charge of probation violation so the accused is hauled off to prison. He has a right to answer those charges too. A court date for probation violation is set. He's entitled to an attorney, bail, everything everyone else is entitled to. Since this didn't happen, the state, so far, lacks evidence that he posted the video to the internet.
IF there were proof and he violated the terms of his probation, he would return to prison for whatever punishment he deserved for violating his probation. There would be no new charges of blasphemy against islam because we don't have blasphemy laws.
That's the way it works, there isn't a charge of probation violation so the accused is hauled off to prison. He has a right to answer those charges too. A court date for probation violation is set. He's entitled to an attorney, bail, everything everyone else is entitled to. Since this didn't happen, the state, so far, lacks evidence that he posted the video to the internet.
IF there were proof and he violated the terms of his probation, he would return to prison for whatever punishment he deserved for violating his probation. There would be no new charges of blasphemy against islam because we don't have blasphemy laws.
Last edited: