Still waiting on that proof that progressives say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime.

This entire topic is based on that bullshit.

That's the problem with straw men. They make your argument crumble.
 
Otherwise, I am sitting here laughing at the irony of you self-destructing your own topic...
Honestly, I sit here every day laughing that you made it to adulthood. Usually, Darwin takes care of people like you to prevent the retarded gene from being passed on...
 
Pseudocons like to drink Kool-Aid laced with arsenic.

Here's a link showing that arsenic is very bad for you: Arsenic poisoning

Boy, did I just spank those pseudocons, or what? :banana:

My argument is indisputable!
 
Thread fail.
Thread fail? Bwahahahaha! Now G-String is denying video. :lmao:
No, dumbshit. I am asking you to prove your premise that progressives say no one has ever stopped a crime with a gun. You built your topic on a lie. And made yourself the fool.
I "built" my topic on the facts. I backed it up with video. As far as your declaration demanding "proof" - how do you want me to prove lies? Progressives idiots say shit like that all the time. How the fuck am I supposed to "prove" something which isn't true?

I think this is your desperate attempt to get me to prove for you what you are incapable of proving yourself :lmao:
 
Thread fail.
Thread fail? Bwahahahaha! Now G-String is denying video. :lmao:
No, dumbshit. I am asking you to prove your premise that progressives say no one has ever stopped a crime with a gun. You built your topic on a lie. And made yourself the fool.
I "built" my topic on the facts.

Nope. You built it on a lie. A lie that progressives say no one has ever stopped a crime with a gun.
 
Pseudocons like to drink Kool-Aid laced with arsenic. Here's a link showing that arsenic is very bad for you: Arsenic poisoning. Boy, did I just spank those pseudocons, or what? :banana:. My argument is indisputable!

In other words... G-String can't dispute the facts so he'll throw a temp tantrum like a small child. :eusa_doh:
Please take a course in critical thinking. And leave the defense of the Second Amendment to the grown ups. You are hurting the cause.
 
Your logical fallacy is a strawman

You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.

To wit, "They love to say that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime."

That is a misrepresentation of the gun control argument. They do not make that claim.
Many an ignorant progressive has. I guess since you can't cry "racist" anymore with the same effect you're turning to "straw man" now?
 
Please take a course in critical thinking. And leave the defense of the Second Amendment to the grown ups. You are hurting the cause.
Ah yes...the 'ole "critical thinking". A buzzword favorite among progressives. I love when progressives throw around words that they don't even understand. I've got $10 right now that G-Sting tries to somehow work the progressive buzzword "infrastructure" into the thread next. :lol:
 
Progressives love their false narratives about firearms. They love to say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime (when in fact an armed citizens prevents a crime every single day in America). They love to say that people who arm themselves are "cowards" who would actually panic and cower in the face of an actual situation requiring the use of deadly force.

Well...the video doesn't lie. Here is a woman - a woman - taking on three armed individuals (two of which are definitely men). She doesn't cowar. She doesn't panic. She presses forward with her firearm - driving the intruders out (and killing one in the process). Even when she has the opportunity to lock the door, she opens it and continues to fire outside. It's the dirt-bag criminals who duck and run like scared little sissies.

This one video defeats all of the progressives favorite false narratives. Progressives want to outlaw firearms because they want to increase their war on women. This woman refused to be a victim. By herself she took on three armed intruders and she won for one reason and one reason only - she was armed. God Bless the 2nd Amendment.

Armed intruders kicked in the door. What they found was a woman opening fire.

Can you name any Progressives of note who have stated that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime?
 
Last edited:
I don't see a lot of disputing of the idea an armed citizen can prevent a crime.

I do see a lot of concern about the sale of assault grade weapons. I don't own a gun, but that's more a personal choice related to the fact I'd be a terrible klutz of shot. I'm in favor of handgun ownership and concealed carry. I'm very much not in favor of assault weapons and high volume ammunition clips.
 
Progressives love their false narratives about firearms. They love to say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime (when in fact an armed citizens prevents a crime every single day in America). They love to say that people who arm themselves are "cowards" who would actually panic and cower in the face of an actual situation requiring the use of deadly force.

Well...the video doesn't lie. Here is a woman - a woman - taking on three armed individuals (two of which are definitely men). She doesn't cowar. She doesn't panic. She presses forward with her firearm - driving the intruders out (and killing one in the process). Even when she has the opportunity to lock the door, she opens it and continues to fire outside. It's the dirt-bag criminals who duck and run like scared little sissies.

This one video defeats all of the progressives favorite false narratives. Progressives want to outlaw firearms because they want to increase their war on women. This woman refused to be a victim. By herself she took on three armed intruders and she won for one reason and one reason only - she was armed. God Bless the 2nd Amendment.

Armed intruders kicked in the door. What they found was a woman opening fire.

Can you name any Progressives of note who have stated that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime?

I think we can translate the stunned silence here into 'no, I can't.'

So why say it?
 
It proves no such thing.

You don't know it happens every day.

The number does matter.

The 2A has nothing to do with crime.

You are awful at this.

LoneLaugher , just why do you think the Second Amendment was written?

Holy shit. Bore me to fucking tears. Are all of you assholes the same person? You MUST know that this question has been asked and answered A THOUSAND TIMES on this forum.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

For the security of a free state. Pretty fucking straight forward.

Not so you can feel safe going to the grocery store. Not until Heller.
 
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

I have it tattooed on my ass, so I am very aware what it means... I just love having you liberal assholes repeat it as often as I can...
 
Progressives love their false narratives about firearms. They love to say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime (when in fact an armed citizens prevents a crime every single day in America). They love to say that people who arm themselves are "cowards" who would actually panic and cower in the face of an actual situation requiring the use of deadly force.

Well...the video doesn't lie. Here is a woman - a woman - taking on three armed individuals (two of which are definitely men). She doesn't cowar. She doesn't panic. She presses forward with her firearm - driving the intruders out (and killing one in the process). Even when she has the opportunity to lock the door, she opens it and continues to fire outside. It's the dirt-bag criminals who duck and run like scared little sissies.

This one video defeats all of the progressives favorite false narratives. Progressives want to outlaw firearms because they want to increase their war on women. This woman refused to be a victim. By herself she took on three armed intruders and she won for one reason and one reason only - she was armed. God Bless the 2nd Amendment.

Armed intruders kicked in the door. What they found was a woman opening fire.

Can you name any Progressives of note who have stated that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime?

The OP appears to have fled. lol, big surprise.
 
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

I have it tattooed on my ass, so I am very aware what it means... I just love having you liberal assholes repeat it as often as I can...

I see. You know that it has nothing to do with crime or self defense. Awesome.
 

Forum List

Back
Top