Indisputable proof and evidence of explosives used on 9/11

[Liability]

The only thing indisputable about the "proof" presented by the "evidence" in the OP is that Troofers are stupid, thoroughly illogical and that they are filthy liars.

In light of Fizz' post showing the vids of a real demolition using explosives which includes the sounds one would hear, it is actually indisputable to any rational and fair minded person that explosives were not used. Not that such proof was needed. The things required for that ridiculous theory to be true simply never existed in the first place.

Troofers are scum.

troofers are delusional asswipes
they need professional help

divecon you need to take some time off...legend has it once upon a time you posted facts and spoke intelligently but now you have been reduced to this rambling shell of a man that just types toofers..moron and asswhipe over and over ..it is like a scene from the shinning...don't be afraid to seek help...


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O0ZfZGF8l8[/ame]

Zzz. The alleged "indisputable proof" was neither "indisputable" NOR "proof."

It is disputed for very good reason. Indeed, as even an idiot like you would recognize if you had the ability to employ logic, the premise of the OP is itself flatly wrong.

Fizz nailed your asses but good with his video post.

You fucking numbnut Troofers are just too stupid and/or too dishonest to see or admit it.

There is no honest question. Clearly, the twin towers did not fall due to the use of any explosives. The proof of that is the only thing actually indisputable (by honest folks WITH brains) about that topic.

Your problem with divecon is that he has exposed you too often for you to take kindly to him. Your hostility stems from your completely justified humiliation.

 

[DiveCon]

The only thing indisputable about the "proof" presented by the "evidence" in the OP is that Troofers are stupid, thoroughly illogical and that they are filthy liars.

In light of Fizz' post showing the vids of a real demolition using explosives which includes the sounds one would hear, it is actually indisputable to any rational and fair minded person that explosives were not used. Not that such proof was needed. The things required for that ridiculous theory to be true simply never existed in the first place.

Troofers are scum.

troofers are delusional asswipes
they need professional help

divecon you need to take some time off...legend has it once upon a time you posted facts and spoke intelligently but now you have been reduced to this rambling shell of a man that just types toofers..moron and asswhipe over and over ..it is like a scene from the shinning...don't be afraid to seek help...

you are the one that needs the help, seriously
seek it out before you become a danger to yourself and/or others

 

[eots]

No but really you are the one that needs the help, seriously
seek it out before you become a danger to yourself and/or others..so there..lol...what a divemoroncon...lol

 

[SFC Ollie]

troofers are delusional asswipes
they need professional help

Hey i thought I had "asswipes" copyrighted..........But you are right.

when did this alleged "copyright" occur?

My lawyers have informed me that the use of the word Asswipe has become synonymous with truther and therefore the copyright has been invalidated.

 

[Liability]

No but really you are the one that needs the help, seriously
seek it out before you become a danger to yourself and/or others..so there..lol...what a divemoroncon...lol

No, but really; there is a very good set of reasons that you are universally laughed at except by other morons embracing stupid, baseless, illogical, irrational, fantasy-ridden Troofer conspiracy crap. The reasons include the fact that you are too fucking blind and stupid to see that your idiotic notions are already refuted -- or you are just too dishonest and prideful to admit it.

Seriously, the only ones not rightfully laughing at you, derisively at that, are either folks unfamiliar with your stupid-ass contentions or your fellow Troofer scumbag fucktard mutant idiots.

-- With all due respect.

 

[eots]

Hey i thought I had "asswipes" copyrighted..........But you are right.

when did this alleged "copyright" occur?

My lawyers have informed me that the use of the word Asswipe has become synonymous with truther and therefore the copyright has been invalidated.

just little **** and little Ollie are interchangeable

 

[Fizz]

where are the explosions?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOGI33HsiCc]YouTube - WTC Collapse Best Angle - InfoDebug.com[/ame]

watch the corner of the building buckle with NO EXPLOSIONS.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBYnUyx4kw8]YouTube - Proof of NO Controlled Demolitions - South Tower 9/11 RARE[/ame]

this is what REAL building demolitions sound like. do you hear any similarity at all?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ]YouTube - Landmark Implosion[/ame]

 

[Liability]

where are the explosions?
YouTube - WTC Collapse Best Angle - InfoDebug.com

watch the corner of the building buckle with NO EXPLOSIONS.
YouTube - Proof of NO Controlled Demolitions - South Tower 9/11 RARE

this is what REAL building demolitions sound like. do you hear any similarity at all?
YouTube - Landmark Implosion

No explosions. Building corner DID buckle and there was no explosion. As the building buckled inward, all that additional weight (plus the added force of it falling onto the underlying & already weakened floor) caused the next floor to also give way and this resulted in an unstoppable domino effect.

As to why the building fell LARGELY straight down -- as opposed to falling outward -- the simplest explanations tend to be the best. It's called gravity.

And, by God, when that final video reaches the point where the building gets explosively imploded, I sure as hell DID hear (and observe) the explosions.

But the Troofer scumbags insist (contrary to all the evidence right before our eyes) that not only was the building laced with thermite, some of those fucktards even claim it was built into the buildings from the time of their construction.

Excellent series of videos. Great post.

 

[DiveCon]

where are the explosions?
YouTube - WTC Collapse Best Angle - InfoDebug.com

watch the corner of the building buckle with NO EXPLOSIONS.
YouTube - Proof of NO Controlled Demolitions - South Tower 9/11 RARE

this is what REAL building demolitions sound like. do you hear any similarity at all?
YouTube - Landmark Implosion

No explosions. Building corner DID buckle and there was no explosion. As the building buckled inward, all that additional weight (plus the added force of it falling onto the underlying & already weakened floor) caused the next floor to also give way and this resulted in an unstoppable domino effect.

As to why the building fell LARGELY straight down -- as opposed to falling outward -- the simplest explanations tend to be the best. It's called gravity.

And, by God, when that final video reaches the point where the building gets explosively imploded, I sure as hell DID hear (and observe) the explosions.

But the Troofer scumbags insist (contrary to all the evidence right before our eyes) that not only was the building laced with thermite, some of those fucktards even claim it was built into the buildings from the time of their construction.

Excellent series of videos. Great post.

troofers are seriously delusional

 

[SFC Ollie]

where are the explosions?
YouTube - WTC Collapse Best Angle - InfoDebug.com

watch the corner of the building buckle with NO EXPLOSIONS.
YouTube - Proof of NO Controlled Demolitions - South Tower 9/11 RARE

this is what REAL building demolitions sound like. do you hear any similarity at all?
YouTube - Landmark Implosion

No explosions. Building corner DID buckle and there was no explosion. As the building buckled inward, all that additional weight (plus the added force of it falling onto the underlying & already weakened floor) caused the next floor to also give way and this resulted in an unstoppable domino effect.

As to why the building fell LARGELY straight down -- as opposed to falling outward -- the simplest explanations tend to be the best. It's called gravity.

And, by God, when that final video reaches the point where the building gets explosively imploded, I sure as hell DID hear (and observe) the explosions.

But the Troofer scumbags insist (contrary to all the evidence right before our eyes) that not only was the building laced with thermite, some of those fucktards even claim it was built into the buildings from the time of their construction.

Excellent series of videos. Great post.

troofers are seriously delusional

Still waiting for the indisputable stuff.......

 

[DiveCon]

No explosions. Building corner DID buckle and there was no explosion. As the building buckled inward, all that additional weight (plus the added force of it falling onto the underlying & already weakened floor) caused the next floor to also give way and this resulted in an unstoppable domino effect.

As to why the building fell LARGELY straight down -- as opposed to falling outward -- the simplest explanations tend to be the best. It's called gravity.

And, by God, when that final video reaches the point where the building gets explosively imploded, I sure as hell DID hear (and observe) the explosions.

But the Troofer scumbags insist (contrary to all the evidence right before our eyes) that not only was the building laced with thermite, some of those fucktards even claim it was built into the buildings from the time of their construction.

Excellent series of videos. Great post.

troofers are seriously delusional

Still waiting for the indisputable stuff.......

dont hold your breath

 

[Godboy]

So when did they have time to lay the explosives in the offices? Truthers are as dumb as birthers.

what is truly dumb is thinking that posing the question of how the explosives were planted as if that somehow changes the evidence of controlled demolition or adds to the lack of evidence for building fires did it..

I have always found that question to be a bit silly. If explosives were used it's moot to ask how they got there as a way of denying it happened. However, up to this point I've not seen anything that confirms thermate or thermite, or another cutting agent was used.

LOL!!! You found the question a bit silly? Its a very important question given the amount of time and man power involved with wiring 2 of the tallest buildings in the world to collapse. The mere fact that you think its a silly question only proves you have a complete innability to use critical thinking. You fail, troofer nutcase.

 

[creativedreams]

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

South Tower Exploding Like a Bag of Flour:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_B_Azbg0go"]YouTube- South Tower Smoking Guns[/ame]

South Tower Exploding Like a Bag of Flour Part 2:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBVhxnkK6s8"]YouTube- South Tower Smoking Guns (Follow-up)[/ame]

North Tower Exploding Like a Bag of Flour:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nc5_5IJek8]YouTube - 9/11 WTC North Tower Exploding[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

^^^ more complete bullshit conclusions

 

[sparky]

lotta that going around Dive

but why 1000 architects would put their reputation on the line is rather distressing to me>

Over 1000 architects and engineers have signed petition to reinvestigate 9-11 destruction

 

[candycorn]

what is truly dumb is thinking that posing the question of how the explosives were planted as if that somehow changes the evidence of controlled demolition or adds to the lack of evidence for building fires did it..

I have always found that question to be a bit silly. If explosives were used it's moot to ask how they got there as a way of denying it happened. However, up to this point I've not seen anything that confirms thermate or thermite, or another cutting agent was used.

LOL!!! You found the question a bit silly? Its a very important question given the amount of time and man power involved with wiring 2 of the tallest buildings in the world to collapse. The mere fact that you think its a silly question only proves you have a complete innability to use critical thinking. You fail, troofer nutcase.

I should take that whackjob off of ignore because I'm missing out on some real gems.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Even a Physicist for NASA for almost 40yrs is well documented as stating there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center buildings. He spoke of how everything but the steel was pulverized into fine dust before it even hit the ground and of massive structural steel members being hurled horizontally for great distance.

[


]

Please explain why we did not hear the explosives going off from each floor...

Like in this controlled Demolition.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ]YouTube - Landmark Implosion[/ame]

 

[SFC Ollie]

I have always found that question to be a bit silly. If explosives were used it's moot to ask how they got there as a way of denying it happened. However, up to this point I've not seen anything that confirms thermate or thermite, or another cutting agent was used.

LOL!!! You found the question a bit silly? Its a very important question given the amount of time and man power involved with wiring 2 of the tallest buildings in the world to collapse. The mere fact that you think its a silly question only proves you have a complete innability to use critical thinking. You fail, troofer nutcase.

I should take that whackjob off of ignore because I'm missing out on some real gems.

Which one?

 

[DiveCon]

lotta that going around Dive

but why 1000 architects would put their reputation on the line is rather distressing to me>

Over 1000 architects and engineers have signed petition to reinvestigate 9-11 destruction

i bet if you really check that list, few of them are actually working architects

 

[Fizz]

I should take that whackjob off of ignore because I'm missing out on some real gems.

Which one?

seriously. they are all getting pretty funny now.