Indict

[JoeMoma]

Hillary Clinton could rob a bank at high noon, take a baby hostage, kill an old librarian, start a dozen people on fire and eat their livers live on television and that rotted c**t wouldn't be indicted

You are talking about trump followers, yes.

Especially if she did those things to Trump supporters.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Hillary Clinton could rob a bank at high noon, take a baby hostage, kill an old librarian, start a dozen people on fire and eat their livers live on television and that rotted c**t wouldn't be indicted

You are talking about trump followers, yes.

Especially if she did those things to Trump supporters.

No, those are how Trump supporters act.

 

[JoeMoma]

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

It's a good thing for Hillary that her name wasn't Martha Stewart.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

It's a good thing for Hillary that her name wasn't Martha Stewart.

Or Scooter Libby or HR Haldeman or John Poindexter...

 

[depotoo]

Yeah, the (deputy director) lead investigator whose ex got paid off by a dnc operative, oh I mean was given Bukus of money for her campaign, which she lost.

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

 

[task0778]

I think Hillary was guilty as hell but she and her people did a good job destroying the evidence. No point in indicting somebody if you can't prove it in court, which was Comey's main point when he didn't recommend that action to the DOJ. He was pretty explicit in saying she was extremely careless in her mishandling of classified information, which is a crime as the law was written. But getting a conviction in court on that charge is another matter.

 

[S.J.]

The emails revealed she was sharing classified information with people who had no security clearance. Up to 10 years in prison.

 

[froggy]

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

In March 2015, it became publicly known that Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as United States Secretary of State, had used her family's privateemail server for official communications, rather than officialState Department email accounts maintained on federal servers. Those official communications included thousands of emails that would retroactively be marked classified by the State Department

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Lol, you mean Loretta Lynch who took a private meeting with Billy boy on the back of her plane while Hillary was under investigation or Comey who had to use the synonyms of "extreme carelessness," in place of: "gross negligence," to avoid the recommendation of prosecuting her? What do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a ******* hammer pal?

 

[task0778]

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

In March 2015, it became publicly known that Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as United States Secretary of State, had used her family's privateemail server for official communications, rather than officialState Department email accounts maintained on federal servers. Those official communications included thousands of emails that would retroactively be marked classified by the State Department

And many WERE classified at the time and marked as such, but she instructed her staff to remove the markings and send the information as unclassified.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, the (deputy director) lead investigator whose ex got paid off by a dnc operative, oh I mean was given Bukus of money for her campaign, which she lost.

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Lol, you mean Loretta Lynch who took a private meeting with Billy boy on the back of her plane while Hillary was under investigation or Comey who had to use the synonyms of "extreme carelessness," in place of: "gross negligence," to avoid the recommendation of prosecuting her? What do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a ******* hammer pal?

Doesn't matter what you think.

You have no influence or power or insight over this.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Yeah, the (deputy director) lead investigator whose ex got paid off by a dnc operative, oh I mean was given Bukus of money for her campaign, which she lost.

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Lol, you mean Loretta Lynch who took a private meeting with Billy boy on the back of her plane while Hillary was under investigation or Comey who had to use the synonyms of "extreme carelessness," in place of: "gross negligence," to avoid the recommendation of prosecuting her? What do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a ******* hammer pal?

Doesn't matter what you think.

You have no influence or power or insight over this.

Answer the question you ******* hack, what do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a hammer?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, the (deputy director) lead investigator whose ex got paid off by a dnc operative, oh I mean was given Bukus of money for her campaign, which she lost.

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Lol, you mean Loretta Lynch who took a private meeting with Billy boy on the back of her plane while Hillary was under investigation or Comey who had to use the synonyms of "extreme carelessness," in place of: "gross negligence," to avoid the recommendation of prosecuting her? What do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a ******* hammer pal?

Doesn't matter what you think.

You have no influence or power or insight over this.

Answer the question you ******* hack, what do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a hammer?

Calm down, sunshine. You have a theme the which you will keep reiterating although you have no evidence that a crime was committed.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

All true.

OTOH, we already know trump has committed crimes, not to mention he has 170 federal suits against him as well as all those investigations of his criminal cabinet.

Then there's the open Pay For Play we all watch, every single day and the open thievery he and his kids do every day - in plain sight.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Burn that bad *****

For what?

A bad hair day... what the **** do you think, for what, dummy?

Thanks for the non-answer. You've got no clue as to why you want her "indicted." She's committed no crime and hasn't been found guilty of anything despite being grilled and harassed for days by know-nothing conservative jackasses with an agenda.

All true.

OTOH, we already know trump has committed crimes, not to mention he has 170 federal suits against him as well as all those investigations of his criminal cabinet.

Then there's the open Pay For Play we all watch, every single day and the open thievery he and his kids do every day - in plain sight.

The new birtherism.
How do allegations against Trump exonerate Hillary?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Hillary Clinton could rob a bank at high noon, take a baby hostage, kill an old librarian, start a dozen people on fire and eat their livers live on television and that rotted c**t wouldn't be indicted

Do a little research and you'll find she's not the criminal the right says she is. Seriously.

The GOP has worked to bring down the Clintons for 30-ish years because they fight for the working class. If they had anything, she would have been arrested.

There is no evidence of crime.

.

Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Yeah, the (deputy director) lead investigator whose ex got paid off by a dnc operative, oh I mean was given Bukus of money for her campaign, which she lost.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Destroying evidence under subpoena with a hammer, let's start with that mother ******.

The investigators don't agree with you, bright eyes.

Lol, you mean Loretta Lynch who took a private meeting with Billy boy on the back of her plane while Hillary was under investigation or Comey who had to use the synonyms of "extreme carelessness," in place of: "gross negligence," to avoid the recommendation of prosecuting her? What do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a ******* hammer pal?

Doesn't matter what you think.

You have no influence or power or insight over this.

Answer the question you ******* hack, what do you call smashing evidence under subpoena with a hammer?

Calm down, sunshine. You have a theme the which you will keep reiterating although you have no evidence that a crime was committed.

You're a brainless troll.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Do a little research and you'll find she's not the criminal the right says she is.

She's just a criminal, period.

 

[task0778]

Hillary Clinton could rob a bank at high noon, take a baby hostage, kill an old librarian, start a dozen people on fire and eat their livers live on television and that rotted c**t wouldn't be indicted

Do a little research and you'll find she's not the criminal the right says she is. Seriously.

The GOP has worked to bring down the Clintons for 30-ish years because they fight for the working class. If they had anything, she would have been arrested.

There is no evidence of crime.

.

Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

There's no evidence cuz she and her stooges destroyed it. By definition a criminal is someone who has been convicted of a crime, which she has not. But let's not pretend she is innocent of any wrongdoing, she is guilty as hell of quite a few criminal acts.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I think it's far better to let the ***** rot away where she is than to indict her, let her spend all of the illegally gained money through the Clinton foundation to hire the best lawyers and not be able to prove it beyond any doubt in court. It's better that people just think shes guilty than she be arrested, tried and walk like OJ. That would give the left ammo.

Nah, she knows shes guilty and so does most of America. It's why the ***** is sitting in her house right now, and it's NOT painted white.