What's new

India is anti-Immigrant!!!???

Decus

Gold Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,923
Reaction score
464
Points
130
Location
West of East
China continues to persecute their Muslim population on a massive scale. Is there a reason why China and India seem unable to deal with Muslims?

.
Ethnic and religious nationalism in the case of India. Minorities never fare well in those situations. China has always been harsh on it's minorities. Look how the treated Tibet.
Tibet is a territorial issue. China refuses to accept Tibet's independence, much as they are also fighting with Taiwan and Hong Kong to limit their independence.

Muslims are at odds and considered troublesome in Thailand, the Philippines, Nigeria, Burma, China, India.....

Go figure.

.
Muslims have been a long established minority in all those countries. In fact, they preceded Catholicism in the Philippines.

China is doing it's best to destroy Tibets culture. It's not just a "territorial" issue.
So the problem is integration. Countries like Thailand, the Philippines, Nigeria.... are unwilling to integrate into Muslim culture, which is the root of all the problems(?).

You are just too funny.

Tibet is first and foremost a territorial issue. Removing the legitimacy of Tibet's right to independence is China's secondary target.

.
If only you could hear yourself. The nations "should integrate into the Muslim culture."
When you have a backward, primitive, hate-filled (towards those that reject its laws) religion like Islam, of course they don't want to "integrate" into it.
That "not wanting to integrate into Islam" is why Islamists are killing thousands across this entire planet, while shouting, "Allah Akbar."
The Hindus aren't trying to spread their religion across the planet, via violence and preaching hatred towards non-believers.
While the Christians proselytize their religion towards others, they aren't out killing people across this entire planet when their religion is rejected.
The Jews essentially keep to themselves when it comes to their own religion.
Islam is the only religion that keeps so close to its violent preachings and truly believes that it MUST be spread across the world, which includes via war.
If one reads the Koran, much of its preachings are about war and killing in the name of its religion.
You seem to have a problem with irony. Reread my post and it may become clear to you.

.
 

Monk-Eye

VIP Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
901
Reaction score
38
Points
63
" Faking It But Not Making It "

* Step Right Up Folks And Give It Another Try *

You seem to have a problem with irony. Reread my post and it may become clear to you.
.
Perhaps rephrasing your post might help , because goals of fictional ishmaelism are separatism , sectarianism and supremacy , such that " ... integration into Muslim ( SIC ) culture ... " is a debase presumption that fictional ishmaelism is the standard of social norms .

In fact , fictional ishmaelism is a debase presumption that qurayshism would apply outside of hejaz to non lineal descendants of ishmael , that is of course as idiotic a presumption as that torahnism would apply outside of israel to non lineal descendants of isaac .
 
Last edited:

Decus

Gold Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,923
Reaction score
464
Points
130
Location
West of East
" Faking It But Not Making It "

* Step Right Up Folks And Give It Another Try *


You seem to have a problem with irony. Reread my post and it may become clear to you.
.
Perhaps rephrasing your post might help , because goals of fictional ishmaelism are separatism , sectarianism and supremacy , such that " ... integration into Muslim ( SIC ) culture ... " is a debase presumption that fictional ishmaelism is the standard of social norms .

In fact , fictional ishmaelism is a debase presumption that qurayshism would apply outside of hejaz to non lineal descendants of ishmael , that is of course as idiotic a presumption as that torahnism would apply outside of israel to non lineal descendants of isaac .
Irony:
"Irony, in its broadest sense, is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or event in which what appears, on the surface, to be the case, differs radically from what is actually the case."

.
 

Monk-Eye

VIP Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
901
Reaction score
38
Points
63
" Doctrine With Copious Self Incrimination *

* Ethical Entitlements For Aggression *


Irony:
"Irony, in its broadest sense, is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or event in which what appears, on the surface, to be the case, differs radically from what is actually the case."
.
The definition of irony is understood , the irony that you are supposedly elucidating is not clearly articulated .

Note that the definition of violence is illegitimate aggression , while self defense against violence is not illegitimate aggression , though for now a formal definition of illegitimate aggression remains to be explained .

If one were to guess about your insinuation of irony , it might be an accusation of hypocrisy by hindus alleging that they are implementing illegitimate aggression without provocation for self defense , or perhaps that any acts of aggression are contrary with a creed of hinduism but have been justified by its supposed adherents .

* Flatulence Justified By Bloviation *

Below is the impetus for September 11 2001 from the qurayn , and there is not a directive to kill or be killed in the gospel meaning that it is emphatically a false statement against the christian ethos .

To add even further to an absurd assertion by the fictional ishmaelism adherents that the qurayn was dictation from an angel , the assertion of surah 9:111 is actually a missed perception by its hue mammon author garnered through a then contemporary inference about the legacy of byzantine militancy after the conversion of its potentates to christianity .

9:111. Indeed, God has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of God, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’ān. And who is truer to his covenant than God? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.
 

irosie91

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
68,268
Reaction score
5,246
Points
1,815
India is not exactly anti-immigrant. As one poster has already pointed out, the BJP government (the one in power) aims to homogenize the country's population and make education and healthcare as neoliberal as possible. This is a two-pronged project. They are for non-Muslim immigrants from Muslim-majority countries, but do not want Muslim immigrants. The project is to make India "Hindustan" (the land of Hindus), where any non-Hindu person (not necessarily "citizen") is second-class. That's why they also favor neoliberalism: good healthcare and education only for those who can afford it; the rest of the population toils for fundamental entitlements. If you're a second-class citizen, are you even a citizen (See: Sociology in Our Times)? To this end, the govt has also passed the Citizenship Amendment Act, one of the most ambitiously cruel and exclusive acts to have been passed in the country.
The indian "citizenship Amendment Act" is, under the circumstances created in the neighboring Muslim countries, and the muslims in other neighboring countries , entirely justifiable. In fact,
it is charitable to those most compromised and in need-----to wit,
persons escaping Islamic oppression. Christians, Zoroastrians,
Sikhs etc, are not complaining. There are many "muslim" countries in southeast asia
 

mosser

Rookie
Joined
Dec 10, 2018
Messages
21
Reaction score
2
Points
1
India is not exactly anti-immigrant. As one poster has already pointed out, the BJP government (the one in power) aims to homogenize the country's population and make education and healthcare as neoliberal as possible. This is a two-pronged project. They are for non-Muslim immigrants from Muslim-majority countries, but do not want Muslim immigrants. The project is to make India "Hindustan" (the land of Hindus), where any non-Hindu person (not necessarily "citizen") is second-class. That's why they also favor neoliberalism: good healthcare and education only for those who can afford it; the rest of the population toils for fundamental entitlements. If you're a second-class citizen, are you even a citizen (See: Sociology in Our Times)? To this end, the govt has also passed the Citizenship Amendment Act, one of the most ambitiously cruel and exclusive acts to have been passed in the country.
The indian "citizenship Amendment Act" is, under the circumstances created in the neighboring Muslim countries, and the muslims in other neighboring countries , entirely justifiable. In fact,
it is charitable to those most compromised and in need-----to wit,
persons escaping Islamic oppression. Christians, Zoroastrians,
Sikhs etc, are not complaining. There are many "muslim" countries in southeast asia

The act excludes minority Muslims sects that face persecution in Muslim-majority countries. As per the act, Muslim immigrants will be illegal immigrants and housed--potentially indefinitely--in detention centers. The ultimate aim of the act is to empower upper caste, middle, upper-middle class, and elite Hindus to run the show. Everybody else will be second-class citizens.
 

Monk-Eye

VIP Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
901
Reaction score
38
Points
63
" More For The Objective And Ignorant "

* Klingon Social Constructs And The Final Solution *

The act excludes minority Muslims sects that face persecution in Muslim-majority countries.
India is defending itself and all are entitled to self defense against threats for or act of illegitimate aggression included in the doctrine of creed for fictional ishmaelism , with not extending an opportunity for citizenship to enter the voting booth to implement tyranny by majority for its hisbah .

Surah 47 was named after its author and the " persecution " the fictional ishmaelism adherent suffers at its own hands is by design .

47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if God had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of God - never will He waste their deeds.
...
47:11 That is because God is the protector of those who have believed and because the disbelievers have no protector.
...
47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.
 
Last edited:

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top