Our New Ungracious Immigrants

[JoeB131]

I think 25 years is probably unrealistically long. However, we definitely need to halt all immigration for a few years until we can figure out what our needs are.
An we should only allow immigrants in who want to be part of American culture and will learn to speak English.
Period.

What is "American Culture"?

Because we celebrate Cinco Di Mayo, Pulaski Day, Columbus Day, St. Patty's Day, Chinese New Year, Oktoberfest, and all those other dirty stinkin' foreign holidays and parties.

My poor wife has been trying to learn English for 10 years, she still hasn't mastered it.

The ability to speak English is less important now that everyone has a translator on their phone.

As for our needs, we know what our needs are. We don't have enough young people to replace the old people who are dying or retiring.

if you want to see what a country with no immigration looks like, look at Japan.

 

[martybegan]

"Never Again" has become, "Well, you shouldn't have picked the losing side!"

Multiple time losing side.

1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, and those are just the conventional wars.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

By that logic, the Holocaust wasn't "genocide" because there were enough Jews left over after it to found Israel.

You don't do logic very well, do you?

The goal of Germany, like the goal of Palestinians, was to wipe out the Jews. To kill every last one of them. The goal of the Jews is simply to survive in peace. You don't do logic well, nor history not even truth.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What is "American Culture"?

Because we celebrate Cinco Di Mayo, Pulaski Day, Columbus Day, St. Patty's Day, Chinese New Year, Oktoberfest, and all those other dirty stinkin' foreign holidays and parties.

My poor wife has been trying to learn English for 10 years, she still hasn't mastered it.

The ability to speak English is less important now that everyone has a translator on their phone.

As for our needs, we know what our needs are. We don't have enough young people to replace the old people who are dying or retiring.

if you want to see what a country with no immigration looks like, look at Japan.

Peaceful low crime Japan. Looks good.

 

[JoeB131]

Multiple time losing side.

1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, and those are just the conventional wars.

Actually, Israel was on the losing side in 1956, as the US snapped their asses back.

They only "won' in the 1973 war because the US bailed them out.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Actually, Israel was on the losing side in 1956, as the US snapped their asses back.

They only "won' in the 1973 war because the US bailed them out.

LOL. In 1967, the "six day war," Israel lost 1000 soldiers while Egypt Syria and Jordan, the three countries that they fought against, lost 15,000. When those 3 countries got their cease fire agreement Israel had occupied the Golan Heights, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Sinai Peninsula, and the Gaza Strip. Your idea of being on the losing side is suspect.

 

[JoeB131]

LOL. In 1967, the "six day war," Israel lost 1000 soldiers while Egypt Syria and Jordan, the three countries that they fought against, lost 15,000. When those 3 countries got their cease fire agreement Israel had occupied the Golan Heights, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Sinai Peninsula, and the Gaza Strip. Your idea of being on the losing side is suspect.

Okay, not sure what your point is here, the Zionists launched a dastardly sneak attack, including almost sinking USS Liberty, and you think that something to be proud of.

Since 1967, we've been bailing them out of mess after mess, gaining the hatred of the Islamic World.

This is really NOT a good thing.

 

[martybegan]

Actually, Israel was on the losing side in 1956, as the US snapped their asses back.

They only "won' in the 1973 war because the US bailed them out.

More revisionist history.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Okay, not sure what your point is here, the Zionists launched a dastardly sneak attack, including almost sinking USS Liberty, and you think that something to be proud of.

Since 1967, we've been bailing them out of mess after mess, gaining the hatred of the Islamic World.

This is really NOT a good thing.

My point was to simply point out the inaccuracy in your post. If you wish to display your antisemitism, you should at least use facts rather that prejudicial hearsay.

Yes Israel attacked first. They did so after becoming aware of the three countries amassing forces to attack them and decided to attack first. They did not lose the war by any interpretation of the facts.

I was stationed in the Middle East during the 6 day war. I had a good friend killed on the Liberty. I do not excuse Israel for these actions. However, I base my ideas on facts, not emotional supposition and hatred of a religious group as you do.

 

[JoeB131]

My point was to simply point out the inaccuracy in your post. If you wish to display your antisemitism, you should at least use facts rather that prejudicial hearsay.

I never denied they won the Six Day war. I just point out that they needed the US to bail them out in 1973 (and every conflict since) and they were on the wrong side of history in the 1956 Suez Crisis. When the US and USSR team up to tell you to knock it off, you know you screwed up.

Yes Israel attacked first. They did so after becoming aware of the three countries amassing forces to attack them and decided to attack first. They did not lose the war by any interpretation of the facts.

No one said they did. Is reading comprehension your poor point?

I was stationed in the Middle East during the 6 day war. I had a good friend killed on the Liberty. I do not excuse Israel for these actions. However, I base my ideas on facts, not emotional supposition and hatred of a religious group as you do.

If you were looking at the facts, you'd realize the Zionists are lying through their teeth about it being an "accident".

You don't accidentally attack a clearly marked US ship THREE TIMES.

 

[Silent Warrior]

I never denied they won the Six Day war.

Actually, you did. Here is the your post I was replying too.

Multiple time losing side.
1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, and those are just the conventional wars.

Since you are denying facts everything else you state in your antisemitic rants are irrelevant.

 

[JoeB131]

Actually, you did. Here is the your post I was replying too.

Multiple time losing side.
1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, and those are just the conventional wars.

Since you are denying facts everything else you state in your antisemitic rants are irrelevant.

Again, I didn't say they lost in 1967, just pointed out that 1956 and 1973 weren't glorious victories.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Again, I didn't say they lost in 1967, just pointed out that 1956 and 1973 weren't glorious victories.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

No. You need work on your writing skills. Again, "Multiple time losing side," then listing 4 years, including 1967, says they lost. Conversing with a narcissist like you is like talking to a wall. Even physical proof isn't enough for you to admit you are wrong. I'm done with you.

 

[JoeB131]

No. You need work on your writing skills. Again, "Multiple time losing side," then listing 4 years, including 1967, says they lost. Conversing with a narcissist like you is like talking to a wall. Even physical proof isn't enough for you to admit you are wrong. I'm done with you.

I didn't list those four years, someone else did.

Also, I get paid for my writing.

You didn't even quote me, you quoted Marty.

To which I responded.

Actually, Israel was on the losing side in 1956, as the US snapped their asses back.

They only "won' in the 1973 war because the US bailed them out.

Never said they lost in 1967.

I freely admit their dastardly sneak attack on their neighbors gave them a victory.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

This is the Democrats new voting base